Literature DB >> 9857505

Exposure-response relationships for transportation noise.

H M Miedema1, H Vos.   

Abstract

This article presents synthesis curves for the relationship between DNL and percentage highly annoyed for three transportation noise sources. The results are based on all 21 datasets examined by Schultz [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 64, 377-405 (1978)] and Fidell et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 89, 221-233 (1991)] for which acceptable DNL and percentage highly annoyed measure could be derived, augmented with 34 datasets. Separate, nonidentical curves were found for aircraft, road traffic, and railway noise. A difference between sources was found using data for all studies combined and for only those studies in which respondents evaluated two sources. The latter outcome strengthens the conclusion that the differences between sources cannot be explained by differences in study methodology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9857505     DOI: 10.1121/1.423927

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  50 in total

Review 1.  WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region: A Systematic Review of Transport Noise Interventions and Their Impacts on Health.

Authors:  Alan Lex Brown; Irene van Kamp
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Wind turbine noise, annoyance and self-reported health and well-being in different living environments.

Authors:  Eja Pedersen; Kerstin Persson Waye
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Odor frequency and odor annoyance Part II: dose-response associations and their modification by hedonic tone.

Authors:  Kirsten Sucker; Ralf Both; Michael Bischoff; Rainer Guski; Ursula Krämer; Gerhard Winneke
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  Health, traffic, and environmental justice: collaborative research and community action in San Francisco, California.

Authors:  Megan Wier; Charlie Sciammas; Edmund Seto; Rajiv Bhatia; Tom Rivard
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Towards a general framework for including noise impacts in LCA.

Authors:  Stefano Cucurachi; Reinout Heijungs; Katrin Ohlau
Journal:  Int J Life Cycle Assess       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 4.141

6.  Economic valuation of noise pollution control policy: does the type of noise matter?

Authors:  Sung-Yoon Huh; Jungwoo Shin
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Noisy human neighbours affect where urban monkeys live.

Authors:  Marina H L Duarte; Marco A Vecci; André Hirsch; Robert J Young
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Health consequences of aircraft noise.

Authors:  Martin Kaltenbach; Christian Maschke; Rainer Klinke
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-08-04       Impact factor: 5.594

9.  Health status as a potential effect modifier of the relation between noise annoyance and incidence of ischaemic heart disease.

Authors:  W Babisch; H Ising; J E J Gallacher
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.402

10.  Trait anxiety and modeled exposure as determinants of self-reported annoyance to sound, air pollution and other environmental factors in the home.

Authors:  Roger Persson; Jonas Björk; Jonas Ardö; Maria Albin; Kristina Jakobsson
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 3.015

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.