Literature DB >> 17332136

Wind turbine noise, annoyance and self-reported health and well-being in different living environments.

Eja Pedersen1, Kerstin Persson Waye.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prevalence of perception and annoyance due to wind turbine noise among people living near the turbines, and to study relations between noise and perception/annoyance, with focus on differences between living environments.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out in seven areas in Sweden across dissimilar terrain and different degrees of urbanisation. A postal questionnaire regarding living conditions including response to wind turbine noise was completed by 754 subjects. Outdoor A-weighted sound pressure levels (SPLs) were calculated for each respondent. Perception and annoyance due to wind turbine noise in relation to SPLs was analysed with regard to dissimilarities between the areas.
RESULTS: The odds of perceiving wind turbine noise increased with increasing SPL (OR 1.3; 95% CI 1.25 to 1.40). The odds of being annoyed by wind turbine noise also increased with increasing SPLs (OR 1.1; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.25). Perception and annoyance were associated with terrain and urbanisation: (1) a rural area increased the risk of perception and annoyance in comparison with a suburban area; and (2) in a rural setting, complex ground (hilly or rocky terrain) increased the risk compared with flat ground. Annoyance was associated with both objective and subjective factors of wind turbine visibility, and was further associated with lowered sleep quality and negative emotions.
CONCLUSION: There is a need to take the unique environment into account when planning a new wind farm so that adverse health effects are avoided. The influence of area-related factors should also be considered in future community noise research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17332136      PMCID: PMC2078467          DOI: 10.1136/oem.2006.031039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  9 in total

1.  Increased prevalence of hypertension in a population exposed to aircraft noise.

Authors:  M Rosenlund; N Berglind; G Pershagen; L Järup; G Bluhm
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Noise sensitivity and reactions to noise and other environmental conditions.

Authors:  Honk M E Miedema; Henk Vos
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Perception and annoyance due to wind turbine noise--a dose-response relationship.

Authors:  Eja Pedersen; Kerstin Persson Waye
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Exposure-response relationships for transportation noise.

Authors:  H M Miedema; H Vos
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Public policy and environmental noise: modeling exposure or understanding effects.

Authors:  S L Staples
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 6.  Synthesis of social surveys on noise annoyance.

Authors:  T J Schultz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  On the interaction of sensory experience, causal attributive cognitions and visual context parameters in noise annoyance.

Authors:  J Kastka; R Noack
Journal:  Dev Toxicol Environ Sci       Date:  1987

8.  Relation between annoyance reactions and attitude to source of annoyance.

Authors:  E Jonsson; S Sörensen
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1970-12       Impact factor: 2.792

9.  Health status as a potential effect modifier of the relation between noise annoyance and incidence of ischaemic heart disease.

Authors:  W Babisch; H Ising; J E J Gallacher
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.402

  9 in total
  34 in total

1.  Adverse health effects of industrial wind turbines.

Authors:  Roy D Jeffery; Carmen Krogh; Brett Horner
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  The influence of wind turbine visibility on the health of local residents: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alice Freiberg; Christiane Schefter; Janice Hegewald; Andreas Seidler
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 3.  Responses of the ear to low frequency sounds, infrasound and wind turbines.

Authors:  Alec N Salt; Timothy E Hullar
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 4.  WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region: A Systematic Review on Environmental Noise and Cardiovascular and Metabolic Effects: A Summary.

Authors:  Elise van Kempen; Maribel Casas; Göran Pershagen; Maria Foraster
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 5.  Health effects and wind turbines: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Loren D Knopper; Christopher A Ollson
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 5.984

6.  Auditory recognition of familiar and unfamiliar subjects with wind turbine noise.

Authors:  Luigi Maffei; Massimiliano Masullo; Maria Di Gabriele; Nefta-Eleftheria P Votsi; John D Pantis; Vincenzo Paolo Senese
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Evaluation of Quality of Life of Those Living near a Wind Farm.

Authors:  Bożena Mroczek; Joanna Banaś; Małgorzata Machowska-Szewczyk; Donata Kurpas
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  The effects of vision-related aspects on noise perception of wind turbines in quiet areas.

Authors:  Luigi Maffei; Tina Iachini; Massimiliano Masullo; Francesco Aletta; Francesco Sorrentino; Vincenzo Paolo Senese; Francesco Ruotolo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Subjective Evaluation on the Annoyance of Environmental Noise Containing Low-Frequency Tonal Components.

Authors:  Miki Yonemura; Hyojin Lee; Shinichi Sakamoto
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  The pattern of complaints about Australian wind farms does not match the establishment and distribution of turbines: support for the psychogenic, 'communicated disease' hypothesis.

Authors:  Simon Chapman; Alexis St George; Karen Waller; Vince Cakic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.