Literature DB >> 26069397

Towards a general framework for including noise impacts in LCA.

Stefano Cucurachi1, Reinout Heijungs1, Katrin Ohlau2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Several damages have been associated with the exposure of human beings to noise. These include auditory effects, i.e., hearing impairment, but also non-auditory physiological ones such as hypertension and ischemic heart disease, or psychological ones such as annoyance, depression, sleep disturbance, limited performance of cognitive tasks or inadequate cognitive development. Noise can also interfere with intended activities, both in daytime and nighttime. ISO 14'040 also indicated the necessity of introducing noise, together with other less developed impact categories, in a complete LCA study, possibly changing the results of many LCA studies already available. The attempts available in the literature focused on the integration of transportation noise in LCA. Although being considered the most frequent source of intrusive impact, transportation noise is not the only type of noise that can have a malign impact on public health. Several other sources of noise such as industrial or occupational need to be taken into account to have a complete consideration of noise into LCA. Major life cycle inventories (LCI) typically do not contain data on noise emissions yet and characterisation factors are not yet clearly defined. The aim of the present paper is to briefly review what is already available in the field and propose a new framework for the consideration of human health impacts of any type of noise that could be of interest in the LCA practice, providing indications for the introduction of noise in LCI and analysing what data is already available and, in the form of a research agenda, what other resources would be needed to reach a complete coverage of the problem. MAIN FEATURES: The literature production related to the impacts of noise on human health has been analysed, with considerations of impacts caused by transportation noise as well as occupational and industrial noise. The analysis of the specialist medical literature allowed for a better understanding of how to deal with the epidemiological findings from an LCA perspective and identify areas still missing dose-response relations. A short review of the state-of-science in the field of noise and LCA is presented with an expansion to other contributions in the field subsequent to the comprehensive work by Althaus et al. (2009a; 2009b). Focusing on the analogy between toxicological analysis of pollutants and noise impact evaluation, an alternative approach is suggested, which is oriented to the consideration of any type of noise in LCA and not solely of transportation noise. A multi-step framework is presented as a method for the inclusion of noise impacts on human health in LCA. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: A theoretical structural framework for the inclusion of noise impacts in LCA is provided as a basis for future modelling expansions in the field. Rather than evaluating traffic/transportation noise, the method focuses on the consideration of the noise level and its impact on human health, regardless of the source producing the noise in an analogous manner as considered in the fields of toxicology and common noise evaluation practices combined. The resulting framework will constitute the basis for the development of a more detailed mathematical model for the inclusion of noise in LCA. The toxicological background and the experience of the analysis of the release of chemicals in LCA seem to provide sufficient ground for the inclusion of noise in LCA: taken into account the physical differences and the uniqueness of noise as an impact, the procedure applied to the release of chemicals during a product life cycle is key for a valuable inclusion of noise in the LCA logic.
CONCLUSIONS: It is fundamental for the development of research in the field of LCA and noise to consider any type of noise. Further studies are needed to contribute to the inclusion of noise sources and noise impacts in LCA. In this paper, a structure is proposed that will be expanded and adapted in the future and which forms the basic framework for the successive modelling phase.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Generic noise sources; Human health; LCA; Noise impact assessment

Year:  2012        PMID: 26069397      PMCID: PMC4456074          DOI: 10.1007/s11367-011-0377-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Life Cycle Assess        ISSN: 0948-3349            Impact factor:   4.141


  28 in total

Review 1.  Nocturnal road traffic noise: A review on its assessment and consequences on sleep and health.

Authors:  Sandra Pirrera; Elke De Valck; Raymond Cluydts
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 9.621

Review 2.  A noisy spring: the impact of globally rising underwater sound levels on fish.

Authors:  Hans Slabbekoorn; Niels Bouton; Ilse van Opzeeland; Aukje Coers; Carel ten Cate; Arthur N Popper
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 3.  Noise pollution: a modem plague.

Authors:  Lisa Goines; Louis Hagler
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 0.954

4.  Road traffic noise and cardiovascular risk.

Authors:  Wolfgang Babisch
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2008 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 0.867

5.  Exposure-response relationships for transportation noise.

Authors:  H M Miedema; H Vos
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The effect of 'conditioning' exposures on hearing loss from impulse noise.

Authors:  L W Henselman; D Henderson; M Subramaniam; V Sallustio
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Biochemical effects of chronic exposure to noise in man.

Authors:  R M Rai; A P Singh; T N Upadhyay; S K Patil; H S Nayar
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 3.015

8.  Increased catecholamine levels in urine in subjects exposed to road traffic noise: the role of stress hormones in noise research.

Authors:  W Babisch; H Fromme; A Beyer; H Ising
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 9.621

Review 9.  Noise exposure and public health.

Authors:  W Passchier-Vermeer; W F Passchier
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Effects of occupational noise exposure on 24-hour ambulatory vascular properties in male workers.

Authors:  Ta-Yuan Chang; Ta-Chen Su; Shou-Yu Lin; Ruei-Man Jain; Chang-Chuan Chan
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  2 in total

1.  Toward a holistic environmental impact assessment of marble quarrying and processing: proposal of a novel easy-to-use IPAT-based method.

Authors:  Cinzia Capitano; Giorgia Peri; Gianfranco Rizzo; Patrizia Ferrante
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Noise footprint from personal land-based mobility.

Authors:  Stefano Cucurachi; Samuel Schiess; Andreas Froemelt; Stefanie Hellweg
Journal:  J Ind Ecol       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 6.946

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.