W Babisch1, H Ising, J E J Gallacher. 1. Federal Environmental Agency, Division of Environment and Health, Berlin, Germany. wolfgang.babisch@uba.de
Abstract
AIMS: Traffic noise is a psychosocial stressor. Epidemiological studies suggest chronic noise stress to be a risk factor for cardiovascular disorders. METHODS: In a prospective cohort study, the association between annoyance and disturbances due to road traffic noise and the incidence of ischaemic heart disease (IHD) was studied in 3950 middle aged men. RESULTS: Depending on the questionnaire item, non-significant odds ratios for IHD incidence ranging from 0.9 to 1.4 were found for the highly noise annoyed/disturbed subjects when compared with the less annoyed/disturbed subjects, over the six year follow up period. However, this relation was strongly modified by the prevalence of pre-existing chronic diseases. In subjects free of any chronic disease at the beginning of the follow up, significant odds ratios between 1.7 and 3.0 were seen. In the subgroup with chronic diseases no such noise effects were seen. This surprising result of no effect in the group of people with a potential risk, due to pre-existing health problems, may be because of the dilution of the true effect due to recall bias. CONCLUSIONS: Annoyance and disturbance due to road traffic noise is associated with a higher incidence of IHD. Prevalence of disease can be an important effect modifier of the relation between noise annoyance and health outcomes.
AIMS: Traffic noise is a psychosocial stressor. Epidemiological studies suggest chronic noise stress to be a risk factor for cardiovascular disorders. METHODS: In a prospective cohort study, the association between annoyance and disturbances due to road traffic noise and the incidence of ischaemic heart disease (IHD) was studied in 3950 middle aged men. RESULTS: Depending on the questionnaire item, non-significant odds ratios for IHD incidence ranging from 0.9 to 1.4 were found for the highly noise annoyed/disturbed subjects when compared with the less annoyed/disturbed subjects, over the six year follow up period. However, this relation was strongly modified by the prevalence of pre-existing chronic diseases. In subjects free of any chronic disease at the beginning of the follow up, significant odds ratios between 1.7 and 3.0 were seen. In the subgroup with chronic diseases no such noise effects were seen. This surprising result of no effect in the group of people with a potential risk, due to pre-existing health problems, may be because of the dilution of the true effect due to recall bias. CONCLUSIONS: Annoyance and disturbance due to road traffic noise is associated with a higher incidence of IHD. Prevalence of disease can be an important effect modifier of the relation between noise annoyance and health outcomes.
Authors: U B Fallon; P Elwood; Y Ben-Shlomo; J B Ubbink; R Greenwood; G D Smith Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Cynthia V Rider; Kim Boekelheide; Natasha Catlin; Christopher J Gordon; Thais Morata; Maryjane K Selgrade; Kenneth Sexton; Jane Ellen Simmons Journal: Toxicol Sci Date: 2013-10-23 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Julia Dratva; Elisabeth Zemp; Denise Felber Dietrich; Pierre-Olivier Bridevaux; Thierry Rochat; Christian Schindler; Margaret W Gerbase Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2010-01-01 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Elise van Kempen; Maribel Casas; Göran Pershagen; Maria Foraster Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-02-22 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Dirk Schreckenberg; Markus Meis; Cara Kahl; Christin Peschel; Thomas Eikmann Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2010-08-31 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Julia Dratva; Harish C Phuleria; Maria Foraster; Jean-Michel Gaspoz; Dirk Keidel; Nino Künzli; L-J Sally Liu; Marco Pons; Elisabeth Zemp; Margaret W Gerbase; Christian Schindler Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2011-09-01 Impact factor: 9.031