OBJECTIVES: We examined to what degree annoyance ratings to noise, air pollution and other common environmental factors in the home environment could be considered to mirror personality disposition in terms of habitual anxiety level and, when appropriate, objectively modeled noise and nitrogen emission (NOx). METHODS: A trait anxiety scale was introduced in a cross-sectional public health survey with 2,856 respondents. Of these, 705 had self-reported asthma and the rest constituted gender-matched referents. Annoyance to ten specific factors in the residential environment, mainly focusing on source-specific noise and air pollution, was assessed on a six-point likert scale. A-weighted energy equivalent continuous sound pressure level during a full day (24 h; L (Aeq,24)) as well as annual average NOx levels (microg/m(3)) at the residential address were modeled with high resolution, using a road data base and a detailed emission data base for NOx. RESULTS: The two most prevalent complaints were annoyance to traffic noise and sounds from neighbors, which was reported by about 8% of the participants. Unadjusted logistic regression analyses using the continuous trait anxiety score as a predictor showed positive associations with ratings of annoyance from total traffic noise, sounds from neighbors, sound from ventilation, exhaust fumes from traffic, sounds from other installations, and vibrations from traffic (ORs between 1.37 and 2.14). Modeled noise and NOx exposure were positively related with annoyance to traffic noise and exhaust fumes, respectively. Adjustment of the trait anxiety scores for other individual characteristics and potential determinants did not change the overall pattern of results. CONCLUSION: Trait anxiety scores were often mirrored in ratings of annoyance, which suggests caution when using annoyance reports either as a surrogate measure for environmental exposure on the individual-level in epidemiologic studies or when studying the moderating effects of annoyance on health outcomes.
OBJECTIVES: We examined to what degree annoyance ratings to noise, air pollution and other common environmental factors in the home environment could be considered to mirror personality disposition in terms of habitual anxiety level and, when appropriate, objectively modeled noise and nitrogen emission (NOx). METHODS: A trait anxiety scale was introduced in a cross-sectional public health survey with 2,856 respondents. Of these, 705 had self-reported asthma and the rest constituted gender-matched referents. Annoyance to ten specific factors in the residential environment, mainly focusing on source-specific noise and air pollution, was assessed on a six-point likert scale. A-weighted energy equivalent continuous sound pressure level during a full day (24 h; L (Aeq,24)) as well as annual average NOx levels (microg/m(3)) at the residential address were modeled with high resolution, using a road data base and a detailed emission data base for NOx. RESULTS: The two most prevalent complaints were annoyance to traffic noise and sounds from neighbors, which was reported by about 8% of the participants. Unadjusted logistic regression analyses using the continuous trait anxiety score as a predictor showed positive associations with ratings of annoyance from total traffic noise, sounds from neighbors, sound from ventilation, exhaust fumes from traffic, sounds from other installations, and vibrations from traffic (ORs between 1.37 and 2.14). Modeled noise and NOx exposure were positively related with annoyance to traffic noise and exhaust fumes, respectively. Adjustment of the trait anxiety scores for other individual characteristics and potential determinants did not change the overall pattern of results. CONCLUSION: Trait anxiety scores were often mirrored in ratings of annoyance, which suggests caution when using annoyance reports either as a surrogate measure for environmental exposure on the individual-level in epidemiologic studies or when studying the moderating effects of annoyance on health outcomes.
Authors: O Van den Bergh; S Devriese; W Winters; H Veulemans; B Nemery; P Eelen; K P Van de Woestijne Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 5.691
Authors: Jesper Kristiansen; Line Mathiesen; Pernille Kofoed Nielsen; Ase Marie Hansen; Hitomi Shibuya; Helga Munch Petersen; Søren Peter Lund; Jørgen Skotte; Marie Birk Jørgensen; Karen Søgaard Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2008-10-21 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Jesper Kristiansen; Roger Persson; Jonas Björk; Maria Albin; Kristina Jakobsson; Per-Olof Ostergren; Jonas Ardö Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2010-08-10 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Kim de Jong; Maria Albin; Erik Skärbäck; Patrik Grahn; John Wadbro; Juan Merlo; Jonas Björk Journal: Environ Health Date: 2011-01-17 Impact factor: 5.984
Authors: Ana Fernández-Somoano; Sabrina Llop; Inmaculada Aguilera; Ibon Tamayo-Uria; María Dolores Martínez; Maria Foraster; Ferran Ballester; Adonina Tardón Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2015-06-18 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Daniel Shepherd; Marja Heinonen-Guzejev; Kauko Heikkilä; Kim N Dirks; Michael J Hautus; David Welch; David McBride Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2015-05-18 Impact factor: 3.390