Literature DB >> 9854440

Determinants of positive and negative generation effects in free recall.

M C Steffens1, E Erdfelder.   

Abstract

Better retention of self-produced as opposed to experimenter-presented material is called generation effect; the reverse phenomenon is the negative generation effect. Both are found in intentional-learning experiments in which generating versus reading is manipulated between subjects. The present article presents an overview of those findings and aims at clarifying the conditions under which these effects emerge. Experiments 1 and 2 demonstrate that if cue-target relations are manipulated within one list, a negative generation effect in free recall can be obtained for all items, no matter which cue-target relation they bear. In Experiment 3, cue-target relations were manipulated between lists. Here, a negative generation effect in free recall was found only in lists in which items were cued with words that mismatched the inter-target relations, whereas a positive generation effect was observed in those lists in which the generation cues matched the inter-target relations. A subsequent cued-recall test demonstrated that in cases of mismatch of relations, participants in the generate condition process cue-target relations at the expense of inter-target relations. The three-factor theory can be integrated with the task-demand account in a transfer-appropriate processing framework to accommodate these findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9854440     DOI: 10.1080/713755794

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A        ISSN: 0272-4987


  10 in total

1.  The generation effect: dissociating enhanced item memory and disrupted order memory.

Authors:  Neil W Mulligan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-09

2.  Positive and negative generation effects, hypermnesia, and total recall time.

Authors:  Neil W Mulligan; Marquinn D Duke
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-10

3.  The emergence of item-specific encoding effects in between-subjects designs: perceptual interference and multiple recall tests.

Authors:  Neil W Mulligan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-06

4.  Anticipating partners' responses: examining item and source memory following interactive exchanges.

Authors:  Mary Ann Foley; Hugh J Foley; Jaime R Durley; Angela T Maitner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-10

5.  The generation effect: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Sharon Bertsch; Bryan J Pesta; Richard Wiscott; Michael A McDaniel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-03

6.  Source-monitoring judgments about anagrams and their solutions: evidence for the role of cognitive operations information in memory.

Authors:  Mary Ann Foley; Hugh J Foley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-03

7.  Limits on the role of retrieval cues in memory for actions: enactment effects in the absence of object cues in the environment.

Authors:  Melanie C Steffens; Axel Buchner; Karl F Wender; Claudia Decker
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-12

8.  Assessing a retrieval account of the generation and perceptual-interference effects.

Authors:  Neil W Mulligan; Daniel Peterson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-12

9.  The processing of inter-item relations as a moderating factor of retrieval-induced forgetting.

Authors:  Tobias Tempel; Werner Wippich
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2012-08-21

10.  Memory Recall After "Learning by Doing" and "Learning by Viewing": Boundary Conditions of an Enactment Benefit.

Authors:  Melanie C Steffens; Rul von Stülpnagel; Janette C Schult
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-12-17
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.