Literature DB >> 17645162

Source-monitoring judgments about anagrams and their solutions: evidence for the role of cognitive operations information in memory.

Mary Ann Foley1, Hugh J Foley.   

Abstract

Generating solutions to anagrams leads to a memory advantage for those solutions, with generated words remembered better than words simply read. However, an additional advantage is not typically found for solutions to difficult anagrams relative to solutions to easy ones, presenting a challenge for the cognitive effort explanation of the generation effect. In the present series of experiments, the effect of manipulating anagram difficulty is explored further by introducing two new source-monitoring judgments. These studies demonstrate that when attention is directed at test to the operations activated during encoding (by way of source-monitoring judgments focused on solving vs. constructing anagrams), a source advantage is observed for difficult anagrams. However, when attention is directed to the anagrams themselves, asking participants to remember the kinds of anagrams generated or solved (based on kind of rule rather than subjective impressions of difficulty), a similar source advantage is not observed. The present studies bring a new perspective to the investigation of difficulty manipulations on memory for problem solving by illustrating the impact of a shift in focus from the effort mediating cognitive operations to specifics about the cognitive operations themselves.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17645162     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  28 in total

1.  Cognitive effort and recollective experience in recognition memory.

Authors:  S A Dewhurst; G J Hitch
Journal:  Memory       Date:  1999-03

2.  Demonstrations of a generation effect in context memory.

Authors:  E J Marsh; G Edelman; G H Bower
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-09

3.  The emergent generation effect and hypermnesia: influences of semantic and nonsemantic generation tasks.

Authors:  Neil W Mulligan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Anticipating partners' responses: examining item and source memory following interactive exchanges.

Authors:  Mary Ann Foley; Hugh J Foley; Jaime R Durley; Angela T Maitner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-10

5.  An evaluation of empirical measures of source identification.

Authors:  K Murnane; U J Bayen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1996-07

6.  Judgments of origin and generation effects: comparisons between young and elderly adults.

Authors:  J C Rabinowitz
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1989-09

7.  Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographical events.

Authors:  M K Johnson; M A Foley; A G Suengas; C L Raye
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1988-12

Review 8.  Source monitoring.

Authors:  M K Johnson; S Hashtroudi; D S Lindsay
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Representation in the mental lexicon: implications for theories of the generation effect.

Authors:  J S Nairne; C Pusen; R L Widner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1985-03

10.  Discriminating between memories: evidence for children's spontaneous elaborations.

Authors:  M A Foley; C Santini; M Sopasakis
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1989-08
View more
  2 in total

1.  Anticipating partners' responses: examining item and source memory following interactive exchanges.

Authors:  Mary Ann Foley; Hugh J Foley; Jaime R Durley; Angela T Maitner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-10

2.  Cortical regions recruited for complex active-learning strategies and action planning exhibit rapid reactivation during memory retrieval.

Authors:  Joel L Voss; Ashley Galvan; Brian D Gonsalves
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 3.139

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.