Literature DB >> 12507369

Positive and negative generation effects, hypermnesia, and total recall time.

Neil W Mulligan1, Marquinn D Duke.   

Abstract

Self-generated information is typically remembered better than perceived information (the generation effect). Experimental design produces an important limiting condition for this effect: Generation enhances recall in within-subjects designs, but typically not in between-subjects designs. However, Mulligan (2001) found that the generation effect emerged over repeated recall tests in a between-subjects design, calling into question the generality of this limiting condition. Two experiments further delineated the emergent generation effect Experiment 1 demonstrated that this effect does not require multiple discrete recall tests but may emerge on a single recall test of long duration. Experiment 2 demonstrated that the negative generation effect (a reversal of the typical generation effect produced under certain conditions) is abolished by multiple recall tests. In both experiments, the generate condition produced greater hypemnesia (increased recall over tests) than did the read condition.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12507369     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194322

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  22 in total

1.  Perceptual interference at encoding enhances item-specific encoding and disrupts relational encoding: evidence from multiple recall tests.

Authors:  N W Mulligan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-06

2.  The emergent generation effect and hypermnesia: influences of semantic and nonsemantic generation tasks.

Authors:  Neil W Mulligan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  The emergence of item-specific encoding effects in between-subjects designs: perceptual interference and multiple recall tests.

Authors:  Neil W Mulligan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-06

4.  Dissociative effects of generation on item and order retention.

Authors:  J S Nairne; G L Riegler; M Serra
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Generating makes words memorable, but so does effective reading.

Authors:  I Begg; E Vinski; L Frankovich; B Holgate
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1991-09

6.  The generation effect: a test between single- and multifactor theories.

Authors:  D J Burns
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Processing instructions and the generation effect: a test of the multifactor transfer-appropriate processing theory.

Authors:  P A de Winstanley; E L Bjork
Journal:  Memory       Date:  1997-05

8.  Lost but not forgotten details: repeated eyewitness recall leads to reminiscence but not hypermnesia.

Authors:  J W Turtle; J C Yuille
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1994-04

9.  Design controversies and the generation effect: support for an item-order hypothesis.

Authors:  M Serra; J S Nairne
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1993-01

10.  Recall criterion does not affect recall level or hypermnesia: a puzzle for generate/recognize theories.

Authors:  H L Roediger; D G Payne
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1985-01
View more
  3 in total

1.  The testing effect in free recall is associated with enhanced organizational processes.

Authors:  Franklin M Zaromb; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-12

2.  Falsely recalled items are rich in item-specific information.

Authors:  Daniel J Burns; Carin L Jenkins; Erica E Dean
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-10

3.  The generation effect: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Sharon Bertsch; Bryan J Pesta; Richard Wiscott; Michael A McDaniel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.