Literature DB >> 23516073

Appendicopathy--a clinical and diagnostic dilemma.

Lars Ivo Partecke1, Andrea Thiele, Franziska Schmidt-Wankel, Wolfram Kessler, Michael Wodny, Frank Dombrowski, Claus-Dieter Heidecke, Wolfram von Bernstorff.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The term "neurogenic appendicopathy" has been used for patients operated on for acute appendicitis with their appendices lacking signs of acute inflammation. The aim of this retrospective study was to clarify the presence of potential neurogenic appendicopathies, analyzing patients' clinical symptoms and their corresponding appendiceal specimens.
METHODS: One hundred twenty-one patients were identified showing a histological diagnosis of chronic appendicitis. Eventually, 40 patients qualified for the potential diagnosis "neurogenic appendicopathy." Appendix specimens were immunohistochemically examined for the expression of S-100, vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP), and substance P. Controls consisted of 110 patients with acute appendicitis and 120 patients following appendectomies operated on for other reasons.
RESULTS: Eventually, 40 of 120 patients qualified for the potential diagnosis "neurogenic appendicopathy." Compared to patients with acute appendicitis, there was only little difference in clinical symptoms. Histologically, neuromas, thought of being characteristic of neurogenic appendicopathy, were demonstrated significantly more often in the control group (p = 0.01). S-100 was significantly more expressed in the appendicopathy group (p = 0.0024), but nearly 50% of control specimens showed an intense staining, too. S-100(+) neurofibers were significantly (p = 0.00122) more often found in the mucosa of appendicopathy specimens, but this was true for only 25% of specimens. VIP was more strongly expressed in control specimens (p = 0.0211). Substance P was of no diagnostic value.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study could not confirm the neurogenic origin of appendicopathies. Yet, clinical data strongly suggest the existence of the entity "appendicopathy." Therefore, we suggest removing a macroscopically unaffected appendix in patients with appendicitis-like symptoms if, on laparoscopy, no other cause can be found.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23516073     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-013-1677-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  28 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults with complicated appendicitis: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Georgios Markides; Daren Subar; Kallingal Riyad
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  [Laparoscopy for suspected appendicitis. Should an appendix that appears normal be removed?].

Authors:  B Garlipp; G Arlt
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Appendectomy in Germany-an analysis of a nationwide survey 2011/2012.

Authors:  Dirk Rolf Bulian; Jürgen Knuth; Axel Sauerwald; Michael Alfred Ströhlein; Rolf Lefering; Jörg Ansorg; Markus Maria Heiss
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Comparison Among Different Closure Methods of the Appendicular Stump in Laparoscopic Appendectomy.

Authors:  Lars Ivo Partecke; Wolfram Kessler; Maciej Patrzyk; Claus-Dieter Heidecke; Wolfram V Bernstorff
Journal:  Surg Technol Int       Date:  2011-12

Review 5.  Acute appendicitis: review and update.

Authors:  D M Hardin
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 3.292

6.  Neurogenic appendicopathy: a clinical disease entity?

Authors:  C Franke; C D Gerharz; H Böhner; C Ohmann; G Heydrich; H J Krämling; W Stock; D Rosen; K Kurpreugsch; H D Röher
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Randomized clinical trial evaluating elective laparoscopic appendicectomy for chronic right lower-quadrant pain.

Authors:  R M H Roumen; R P R Groenendijk; C E J Sloots; K E S Duthoi; M R M Scheltinga; C M A Bruijninckx
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  A normal appendix found during diagnostic laparoscopy should not be removed.

Authors:  W T van den Broek; A B Bijnen; P de Ruiter; D J Gouma
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Laparoscopic appendectomy: a new opportunity for curing appendicopathy.

Authors:  H J de Kok
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1992-12

10.  Negative appendectomy and imaging accuracy in the Washington State Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program.

Authors:  Joseph Cuschieri; Michael Florence; David R Flum; Gregory J Jurkovich; Paul Lin; Scott R Steele; Rebecca Gaston Symons; Richard Thirlby
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  5 in total

1.  Laparoscopic appendectomy for chronic right lower quadrant abdominal pain.

Authors:  Charles C van Rossem; Kaij Treskes; David L Loeza; Anna A W van Geloven
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  The continuing dilemma of chronic appendicitis.

Authors:  Peter J Whorwell
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.409

3.  Unusual Entities of Appendix Mimicking Appendicitis Clinically - Emphasis on Diagnosis and Treatment.

Authors:  Rikki Singal; Muzzafar Zaman; Bhanu Pratap Sharma
Journal:  Maedica (Bucur)       Date:  2017-01

4.  Differences between inflamed and non inflamed appendices diagnosed as acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Pedro Luiz do Nascimento Junior; Carlos Teixeira Brandt; Andy Petroianu
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-01-18

Review 5.  Neurogenic Appendicitis: A Reappraisal of the Clinicopathological Features and Pathogenesis.

Authors:  Mahmoud Rezk Abdelwahed Hussein; Ali Al Bshabshe; Ahmed Abdelsatar Elhakeem; Mahmoud Kamal Elsamman
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.