Literature DB >> 23073690

Evaluation of the appendix during diagnostic laparoscopy, the laparoscopic appendicitis score: a pilot study.

Jenneke T H Hamminga1, H Sijbrand Hofker, Paul M A Broens, Philip M Kluin, Erik Heineman, Jan Willem Haveman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic laparoscopy is the ultimate diagnostic tool to evaluate the appendix. Still, according to the literature, this strategy results in a negative appendectomy rate of approximately 12-18 % and associated morbidity. Laparoscopic criteria for determining appendicitis are lacking. The goal of this study is to define clear and reliable criteria for appendicitis during diagnostic laparoscopy that eventually may safely reduce the negative appendectomy rate.
METHODS: From December 2009 through April 2011, 134 patients were included and analysed in a single-centre prospective pilot study. Intraoperatively, the appendix was evaluated by the surgeon according to nine criteria for appendicitis. The operating surgeon decided whether it should be removed or not. Immediately after the operation the surgeon had to complete a questionnaire on nine criteria for appendicitis. All removed appendices were examined by a pathologist. In case the appendix was not removed, the clinical postoperative course was decisive for the (missed) presence of appendicitis.
RESULTS: In 109 cases an inflamed appendix was removed; in 25 patients the appendix was normal, 3 of which had been removed. After univariate analysis and clinical judgement six variables were included in the Laparoscopic APPendicitis score (LAPP score). In this study, use of the LAPP score would have led to a positive predictive value of 99 % and a negative predictive value of 100 %.
CONCLUSIONS: This study presents the LAPP score. The LAPP score is an easily applicable score that can be used by surgeons to evaluate the appendix during diagnostic laparoscopy. The score has high positive and negative predictive value. The LAPP score needs to be validated in a multicentre validation study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23073690     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2634-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  21 in total

1.  Bowel obstruction following appendectomy: what is the true incidence?

Authors:  Terry T W Leung; Elijah Dixon; Manpreet Gill; Brett D Mador; Kyle M Moulton; Gilaad G Kaplan; Anthony R MacLean
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  A Alvarado
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 5.721

3.  [Guideline on diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: imaging prior to appendectomy is recommended].

Authors:  Olaf J Bakker; Peter M N Y H Go; Julien B C M Puylaert; Geert Kazemier; Hugo A Heij
Journal:  Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd       Date:  2010

4.  Review of the pathological results of 2660 appendicectomy specimens.

Authors:  Ravi Marudanayagam; Geraint T Williams; Brian I Rees
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.527

5.  Small bowel obstruction after appendicectomy.

Authors:  R E Andersson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  The utility of laparoscopy in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in women of reproductive age.

Authors:  R van Dalen; P F Bagshaw; B R Dobbs; G M Robertson; A C Lynch; F A Frizelle
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  A normal appendix found during diagnostic laparoscopy should not be removed.

Authors:  W T van den Broek; A B Bijnen; P de Ruiter; D J Gouma
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Implications of removing a normal appendix.

Authors:  C L Bijnen; W T van den Broek; A B Bijnen; P de Ruiter; D J Gouma
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.588

9.  Negative appendectomy and imaging accuracy in the Washington State Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program.

Authors:  Joseph Cuschieri; Michael Florence; David R Flum; Gregory J Jurkovich; Paul Lin; Scott R Steele; Rebecca Gaston Symons; Richard Thirlby
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Defining the current negative appendectomy rate: for whom is preoperative computed tomography making an impact?

Authors:  Patrick L Wagner; Soumitra R Eachempati; Kevin Soe; Frederic M Pieracci; Jian Shou; Philip S Barie
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.982

View more
  6 in total

1.  Feasibility of the laparoscopic appendicitis score.

Authors:  Zhihong Liu; Yiping Lu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-08-24       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines.

Authors:  Salomone Di Saverio; Mauro Podda; Belinda De Simone; Marco Ceresoli; Goran Augustin; Alice Gori; Marja Boermeester; Massimo Sartelli; Federico Coccolini; Antonio Tarasconi; Nicola De' Angelis; Dieter G Weber; Matti Tolonen; Arianna Birindelli; Walter Biffl; Ernest E Moore; Michael Kelly; Kjetil Soreide; Jeffry Kashuk; Richard Ten Broek; Carlos Augusto Gomes; Michael Sugrue; Richard Justin Davies; Dimitrios Damaskos; Ari Leppäniemi; Andrew Kirkpatrick; Andrew B Peitzman; Gustavo P Fraga; Ronald V Maier; Raul Coimbra; Massimo Chiarugi; Gabriele Sganga; Adolfo Pisanu; Gian Luigi De' Angelis; Edward Tan; Harry Van Goor; Francesco Pata; Isidoro Di Carlo; Osvaldo Chiara; Andrey Litvin; Fabio C Campanile; Boris Sakakushev; Gia Tomadze; Zaza Demetrashvili; Rifat Latifi; Fakri Abu-Zidan; Oreste Romeo; Helmut Segovia-Lohse; Gianluca Baiocchi; David Costa; Sandro Rizoli; Zsolt J Balogh; Cino Bendinelli; Thomas Scalea; Rao Ivatury; George Velmahos; Roland Andersson; Yoram Kluger; Luca Ansaloni; Fausto Catena
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  The morbidity of negative appendicectomy.

Authors:  M Lee; T Paavana; F Mazari; T R Wilson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 4.  WSES Jerusalem guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Salomone Di Saverio; Arianna Birindelli; Micheal D Kelly; Fausto Catena; Dieter G Weber; Massimo Sartelli; Michael Sugrue; Mark De Moya; Carlos Augusto Gomes; Aneel Bhangu; Ferdinando Agresta; Ernest E Moore; Kjetil Soreide; Ewen Griffiths; Steve De Castro; Jeffry Kashuk; Yoram Kluger; Ari Leppaniemi; Luca Ansaloni; Manne Andersson; Federico Coccolini; Raul Coimbra; Kurinchi S Gurusamy; Fabio Cesare Campanile; Walter Biffl; Osvaldo Chiara; Fred Moore; Andrew B Peitzman; Gustavo P Fraga; David Costa; Ronald V Maier; Sandro Rizoli; Zsolt J Balogh; Cino Bendinelli; Roberto Cirocchi; Valeria Tonini; Alice Piccinini; Gregorio Tugnoli; Elio Jovine; Roberto Persiani; Antonio Biondi; Thomas Scalea; Philip Stahel; Rao Ivatury; George Velmahos; Roland Andersson
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 5.  How to improve the clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis in resource limited settings.

Authors:  Alfredo Alvarado
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis. EAES consensus development conference 2015.

Authors:  Ramon R Gorter; Hasan H Eker; Marguerite A W Gorter-Stam; Gabor S A Abis; Amish Acharya; Marjolein Ankersmit; Stavros A Antoniou; Simone Arolfo; Benjamin Babic; Luigi Boni; Marlieke Bruntink; Dieuwertje A van Dam; Barbara Defoort; Charlotte L Deijen; F Borja DeLacy; Peter Mnyh Go; Annelieke M K Harmsen; Rick S van den Helder; Florin Iordache; Johannes C F Ket; Filip E Muysoms; M Mahir Ozmen; Michail Papoulas; Michael Rhodes; Jennifer Straatman; Mark Tenhagen; Victor Turrado; Andras Vereczkei; Ramon Vilallonga; Jort D Deelder; Jaap Bonjer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 4.584

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.