Literature DB >> 22773232

Development and evaluation of a simulator-based laparoscopic training program for surgical novices.

Emmeline Nugent1, Nicole Shirilla, Adnan Hafeez, Diarmuid S O'Riordain, Oscar Traynor, Anthony M Harrison, Paul Neary.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of simulation to train novice surgeons in laparoscopic skills is becoming increasingly popular. To maximize benefit from simulation, training needs to be delivered and assessed in a structured manner. This study aimed to define performance goals, demonstrate construct validity of the training program, and evaluate whether novice surgeons could reach the preset performance goals.
METHODS: Nine expert laparoscopic surgeons established performance goals for three basic modules of an augmented-reality laparoscopic simulator. The three laparoscopic modules were used by 40 novice surgeons and 40 surgical trainees (postgraduate years [PGYs] 1-4). The performance outcomes were analyzed across the different groups (novice, PGYs 1 and 2, PGYs 3 and 4, expert) to determine construct validity. Then 26 recruited novices trained on the three modules with the aim of reaching the performance goals.
RESULTS: The results demonstrated a significant difference in performance between all levels of experience for time (p < 0.001), motion analysis (p < 0.001), and error score (p < 0.001), thus demonstrating construct validity. All 26 novice surgeons significantly improved in performance with repetition for the metrics of time (p < 0.001) and motion analysis (p < 0.001). For two of the modules, the proficiency goals were reached in fewer than 10 trials by 80% of the study participants.
CONCLUSION: Basic skills in laparoscopic surgery can be learned and improved using proficiency-based simulation training. It is possible for novice surgeons to achieve predefined performance goals in a reasonable time frame.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22773232     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2423-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  24 in total

1.  The nationwide frequency of major adverse outcomes in antireflux surgery and the role of surgeon experience, 1992-1997.

Authors:  David R Flum; Thomas Koepsell; Patrick Heagerty; Carlos A Pellegrini
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study.

Authors:  Neal E Seymour; Anthony G Gallagher; Sanziana A Roman; Michael K O'Brien; Vipin K Bansal; Dana K Andersen; Richard M Satava
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Performance goals on simulators boost resident motivation and skills laboratory attendance.

Authors:  Dimitrios Stefanidis; Christina E Acker; Frederick L Greene
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.891

4.  Initial laparoscopic basic skills training shortens the learning curve of laparoscopic suturing and is cost-effective.

Authors:  Dimitrios Stefanidis; William W Hope; James R Korndorffer; Sarah Markley; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Video-assisted surgery represents more than a loss of three-dimensional vision.

Authors:  Anthony G Gallagher; E Matt Ritter; Andrew B Lederman; David A McClusky; C Daniel Smith
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Skill retention following proficiency-based laparoscopic simulator training.

Authors:  Dimitrios Stefanidis; James R Korndorffer; Rafael Sierra; Cheri Touchard; J Bruce Dunne; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  The fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery: its time has come.

Authors:  Nathaniel J Soper; Gerald M Fried
Journal:  Bull Am Coll Surg       Date:  2008-09

8.  The Libby Zion case. One step forward or two steps backward?

Authors:  D A Asch; R M Parker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-03-24       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Criterion-based laparoscopic training reduces total training time.

Authors:  Willem M Brinkman; Sonja N Buzink; Leonidas Alevizos; Ignace H J T de Hingh; Jack J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Spatial perception predicts laparoscopic skills on virtual reality laparoscopy simulator.

Authors:  I Hassan; B Gerdes; M Koller; B Dick; D Hellwig; M Rothmund; A Zielke
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 1.532

View more
  6 in total

1.  Competency Testing for Pediatric Cardiology Fellows Learning Transthoracic Echocardiography: Implementation, Fellow Experience, and Lessons Learned.

Authors:  Jami C Levine; Tal Geva; David W Brown
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 2.  Systematic review on the effectiveness of augmented reality applications in medical training.

Authors:  E Z Barsom; M Graafland; M P Schijven
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Efficacy of goal-directed minimally invasive surgery simulation training with the Lübeck Toolbox-Curriculum prior to first operations on patients: Study protocol for a multi-centre randomized controlled validation trial (NOVICE).

Authors:  Michael Thomaschewski; Tilman Laubert; Markus Zimmermann; Hamed Esnaashari; Reinhard Vonthein; Tobias Keck; Claudia Benecke
Journal:  Int J Surg Protoc       Date:  2020-03-14

4.  Effectiveness of an inexpensive short-term theoretical-practical course on videosurgery for surgeons in training.

Authors:  Paula Haveroth Takegawa; Jefferson Kalil; Joaquim Murray Bustorff-Silva; Márcio Lopes Miranda
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 3.263

5.  Effects of mobile augmented reality learning compared to textbook learning on medical students: randomized controlled pilot study.

Authors:  Urs-Vito Albrecht; Kristian Folta-Schoofs; Marianne Behrends; Ute von Jan
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 6.  Augmented reality in medical education: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kevin S Tang; Derrick L Cheng; Eric Mi; Paul B Greenberg
Journal:  Can Med Educ J       Date:  2020-03-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.