Literature DB >> 12811661

Reaction times and the decision-making process in endoscopic surgery.

B Zheng1, Z Janmohamed, C L MacKenzie.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are times during endoscopic procedures when the displayed surgical field does not align with the actual field due to rotation of the camera. The surgeon's performance may deteriorate under this situation. However, the effects of misalignment on the decision-making processes during endoscopic procedures have not been fully explored. The present study addresses this problem and suggests a technique that may be used to alleviate it.
METHODS: Two experiments were completed in a mock endoscopic surgical setup where the image of the work plane inside the training box was either projected on a vertical monitor placed at eye level or superimposed over the training box by means of a half-silvered mirror. The work plane consisted of a start plate and four target plates. The experimenter varied the number of choices of target location among one, two, and four target choices. Rotating the camera about its longitudinal axis misaligned the displayed and the actual work plane. There were two experiments that differed in task difficulty. The task in experiment 1 was to touch the target plate, whereas the task in experiment 2 was to reach, grasp, and transport the object from the target to the start plate.
RESULTS: Experiment 1 showed that reaction time increased with the number of the choices for a touch task, in accordance with the Hick-Hyman law. Using a grasp-and-transport task, experiment 2 replicated experiment 1 and extended the results to show that the use of a superimposed image display facilitated the decision-making process, leading to shorter reaction times compared to the vertical image display. DISCUSSION: During endoscopic procedures, the surgeon needs to translate indirect perceptions to instrument-mediated actions by "mapping" them through sensorimotor integration. The superimposed image alleviates the mental load of spatial transformations by reducing the difficulty of the required sensorimotor mapping. These findings have important implications for the design of high-quality superimposed display technologies.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12811661     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-002-8759-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  8 in total

1.  Visual Displays and Visual Perception in Minimal Access Surgery.

Authors: 
Journal:  Semin Laparosc Surg       Date:  1995-09

2.  Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  R Berguer; D L Forkey; W D Smith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Performing laparoscopic surgery is significantly more stressful for the surgeon than open surgery.

Authors:  R Berguer; W D Smith; Y H Chung
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Methods for improving performance under reverse alignment conditions during endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  A B Cresswell; A I Macmillan; G B Hanna; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Eye-hand coordination in laparoscopy - an overview of experiments and supporting aids.

Authors: 
Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.442

6.  An ergonomic analysis of the fulcrum effect in the acquisition of endoscopic skills.

Authors:  A G Gallagher; N McClure; J McGuigan; K Ritchie; N P Sheehy
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 10.093

7.  Task performance in endoscopic surgery is influenced by location of the image display.

Authors:  G B Hanna; S M Shimi; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Influence of direction of view, target-to-endoscope distance and manipulation angle on endoscopic knot tying.

Authors:  G B Hanna; S Shimi; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 6.939

  8 in total
  7 in total

1.  Assessing the benefits of "gaze-down" display location in complex tasks.

Authors:  A M Omar; N J Wade; S I Brown; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-11-11       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Video analysis of endoscopic cutting task performed by one versus two operators.

Authors:  B Zheng; F Verjee; A Lomax; C L MacKenzie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-08-25       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  A laboratory study on anticipatory movement in laparoscopic surgery: a behavioral indicator for team collaboration.

Authors:  B Zheng; L L Swanström; C L MacKenzie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-12-16       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Semiautomated optical coherence tomography-guided robotic surgery for porcine lens removal.

Authors:  Cheng-Wei Chen; Anibal Andrés Francone; Matthew J Gerber; Yu-Hsiu Lee; Andrea Govetto; Tsu-Chin Tsao; Jean-Pierre Hubschman
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 3.351

5.  Systematic review of measurement tools to assess surgeons' intraoperative cognitive workload.

Authors:  R D Dias; M C Ngo-Howard; M T Boskovski; M A Zenati; S J Yule
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Optimizing laparoscopic task efficiency: the role of camera and monitor positions.

Authors:  Liam A Haveran; Yuri W Novitsky; Donald R Czerniach; Gordie K Kaban; Melinda Taylor; Karen Gallagher-Dorval; Richard Schmidt; John J Kelly; Demetrius E M Litwin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Leveraging 5G technology for robotic surgery and cancer care.

Authors:  Krunal Pandav; Austen G Te; Nir Tomer; Sujit S Nair; Ashutosh K Tewari
Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)       Date:  2022-03-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.