Literature DB >> 9820186

The relationship of anthropometric measures to radiological features of the breast in premenopausal women.

N F Boyd1, G A Lockwood, J W Byng, L E Little, M J Yaffe, D L Tritchler.   

Abstract

We studied 273 premenopausal women recruited from mammography units who had different degrees of density of the breast parenchyma on mammography, in whom we measured height, weight and skinfold thicknesses. Mammograms were digitized to high spatial resolution by a scanning densitometer and images analysed to measure the area of dense tissue and the total area of the breast. Per cent density and the area of non-dense tissue were calculated from these measurements. We found that the mammographic measures had different associations with body size. Weight and the Quetelet index of obesity were strongly and positively associated with the area of non-dense tissue and with the total area of the breast, but less strongly and negatively correlated with the area of dense tissue. We also found a strong inverse relationship between the areas of radiologically dense and non-dense breast tissue. Statistical models containing anthropometric variables explained up to 8% of the variance in dense area, but explained up to 49% of the variance in non-dense area and 43% of variance in total area. These results suggest that aetiological studies in breast cancer that use mammographic density should consider dense and non-dense tissues separately. In addition to per cent density, methods should be examined that combine information from these two tissues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9820186      PMCID: PMC2063010          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1998.660

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  26 in total

1.  The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities.

Authors:  J W Byng; N F Boyd; E Fishell; R A Jong; M J Yaffe
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Breast parenchymal patterns and their changes with age.

Authors:  J N Wolfe
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Factors associated with breast structure in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  J S Grove; M J Goodman; F Gilbert; D Clyde
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Breast mammographic pattern: a concatenation of confounding and breast cancer risk factors.

Authors:  S A Bartow; D R Pathak; F A Mettler; C R Key; M C Pike
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1995-10-15       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 5.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns: a marker of breast cancer risk.

Authors:  A M Oza; N F Boyd
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 6.222

6.  Height and weight, mammographic features of breast tissue, and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  J Brisson; A S Morrison; D B Kopans; N L Sadowsky; L Kalisher; J A Twaddle; J E Meyer; C I Henschke; P Cole
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Plasma lipids, lipoproteins, and mammographic densities.

Authors:  N F Boyd; P Connelly; J Byng; M Yaffe; H Draper; L Little; D Jones; L J Martin; G Lockwood; D Tritchler
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1995 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Risk for breast cancer development determined by mammographic parenchymal pattern.

Authors:  J N Wolfe
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 9.  Cellular and molecular factors in adipose tissue growth and obesity.

Authors:  D A Roncari; B S Hamilton
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.622

10.  Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status.

Authors:  C Byrne; C Schairer; J Wolfe; N Parekh; M Salane; L A Brinton; R Hoover; R Haile
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1995-11-01       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  46 in total

1.  Associations of physical activity, sedentary time, and insulin with percent breast density in Hispanic women.

Authors:  Kathleen Y Wolin; Laura A Colangelo; Brian C-H Chiu; Barbara Ainsworth; Robert Chatterton; Susan M Gapstur
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Effect of raloxifene on mammographic density and breast magnetic resonance imaging in premenopausal women at increased risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer Eng-Wong; Jennifer Orzano-Birgani; Catherine K Chow; David Venzon; Jianhua Yao; Claudia E Galbo; Jo Anne Zujewski; Sheila Prindiville
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Breast density, body mass index, and risk of tumor marker-defined subtypes of breast cancer.

Authors:  Amanda I Phipps; Diana S M Buist; Kathleen E Malone; William E Barlow; Peggy L Porter; Karla Kerlikowske; Ellen S O'Meara; Christopher I Li
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 3.797

4.  Reproductive and lifestyle risk factors and mammographic density in Mexican women.

Authors:  Megan S Rice; Kimberly A Bertrand; Martin Lajous; Rulla M Tamimi; Gabriela Torres; Ruy López-Ridaura; Isabelle Romieu
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 3.797

5.  Age at Menarche and Late Adolescent Adiposity Associated with Mammographic Density on Processed Digital Mammograms in 24,840 Women.

Authors:  Stacey E Alexeeff; Nnaemeka U Odo; Jafi A Lipson; Ninah Achacoso; Joseph H Rothstein; Martin J Yaffe; Rhea Y Liang; Luana Acton; Valerie McGuire; Alice S Whittemore; Daniel L Rubin; Weiva Sieh; Laurel A Habel
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Body size across the life course, mammographic density, and risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Holly R Harris; Rulla M Tamimi; Walter C Willett; Susan E Hankinson; Karin B Michels
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Circulating sex hormones and mammographic breast density among postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Brian L Sprague; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Ronald E Gangnon; Diana S M Buist; Elizabeth S Burnside; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Frank Z Stanczyk; Gale S Sisney
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.869

8.  Serum concentrations of DDE, PCBs, and other persistent organic pollutants and mammographic breast density in Triana, Alabama, a highly exposed population.

Authors:  J A Rusiecki; H Denic-Roberts; C Byrne; J Cash; C F Raines; L A Brinton; S H Zahm; T Mason; M R Bonner; A Blair; R Hoover
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 6.498

9.  A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of diindolylmethane for breast cancer biomarker modulation in patients taking tamoxifen.

Authors:  Cynthia A Thomson; H H Sherry Chow; Betsy C Wertheim; Denise J Roe; Alison Stopeck; Gertraud Maskarinec; Maria Altbach; Pavani Chalasani; Chuan Huang; Meghan B Strom; Jean-Philippe Galons; Patricia A Thompson
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Breast density assessment in adolescent girls using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: a feasibility study.

Authors:  John A Shepherd; Serghei Malkov; Bo Fan; Aurelie Laidevant; Rachel Novotny; Gertraud Maskarinec
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.