Literature DB >> 7572957

Breast mammographic pattern: a concatenation of confounding and breast cancer risk factors.

S A Bartow1, D R Pathak, F A Mettler, C R Key, M C Pike.   

Abstract

A mammographic pattern of > 25% radiodensity is associated with increased risk for breast cancer. Mammographic pattern is influenced by age, body weight, reproductive factors, and race/ethnicity. The interaction among these factors in predicting breast radiographic pattern, and their association with the presence of histologic markers of increased risk of breast cancer, is poorly defined. To elucidate the relations among epidemiologic, radiographic, and histologic markers of breast cancer risk, the authors studied these factors in an unselected forensic autopsy series, accumulated between 1978 and 1983, of 486 women aged 15-98 years at death. Older age and/or postmenopausal status was the strongest predictor of radiolucent breast pattern. Obesity, defined as a Quetelet index (weight(kg)/height(m)2) of > 25, and large breast size were also highly significant predictors of breast radiolucency. Factors related to parity were not significant predictors of breast parenchymal pattern. Native American race was an independent predictor of breast radiolucency in this population. A dense parenchymal pattern was associated with increased prevalence of marked cystic change and the presence of duct epithelial hyperplasia in women under age 35. The results support the association of breast radiodensity with ethnic/racial, reproductive, and histologic factors predictive of cancer risk. However, this association is overshadowed by the effects of obesity and aging or menopause.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7572957     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117720

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  18 in total

1.  Mammographic density, MRI background parenchymal enhancement and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  M C Pike; C L Pearce
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 2.  Mammographic density is not a worthwhile examination to distinguish high cancer risk women in screening.

Authors:  Catherine Colin; Anne-Marie Schott; Pierre-Jean Valette
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Stiff stroma increases breast cancer risk by inducing the oncogene ZNF217.

Authors:  Jason J Northey; Alexander S Barrett; Irene Acerbi; Mary-Kate Hayward; Stephanie Talamantes; Ivory S Dean; Janna K Mouw; Suzanne M Ponik; Jonathon N Lakins; Po-Jui Huang; Junmin Wu; Quanming Shi; Susan Samson; Patricia J Keely; Rita A Mukhtar; Jan T Liphardt; John A Shepherd; E Shelley Hwang; Yunn-Yi Chen; Kirk C Hansen; Laurie E Littlepage; Valerie M Weaver
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  Terminal duct lobular unit involution of the normal breast: implications for breast cancer etiology.

Authors:  Jonine D Figueroa; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Deesha A Patel; Laura Linville; Louise A Brinton; Gretchen L Gierach; Xiaohong R Yang; Daphne Papathomas; Daniel Visscher; Carolyn Mies; Amy C Degnim; William F Anderson; Stephen Hewitt; Zeina G Khodr; Susan E Clare; Anna Maria Storniolo; Mark E Sherman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Mammographic density as a predictor of breast cancer outcome.

Authors:  Gertraud Maskarinec; Christy G Woolcott; Laurence N Kolonel
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.404

6.  Tissue composition of mammographically dense and non-dense breast tissue.

Authors:  Karthik Ghosh; Kathleen R Brandt; Carol Reynolds; Christopher G Scott; V S Pankratz; Darren L Riehle; Wilma L Lingle; Tonye Odogwu; Derek C Radisky; Daniel W Visscher; James N Ingle; Lynn C Hartmann; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 7.  Use of the autopsy to study ontogeny and expression of the estrogen receptor gene in human breast.

Authors:  S A Bartow
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.673

8.  Serum vitamin D and breast density in breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Marian L Neuhouser; Leslie Bernstein; Bruce W Hollis; Liren Xiao; Anita Ambs; Kathy Baumgartner; Richard Baumgartner; Anne McTiernan; Rachel Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Longitudinal association of anthropometry with mammographic breast density in the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation.

Authors:  Katherine W Reeves; Roslyn A Stone; Francesmary Modugno; Roberta B Ness; Victor G Vogel; Joel L Weissfeld; Laurel A Habel; Barbara Sternfeld; Jane A Cauley
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Mammographic density and epithelial histopathologic markers.

Authors:  Martijn Verheus; Gertraud Maskarinec; Eva Erber; Jana S Steude; Jeffrey Killeen; Brenda Y Hernandez; J Mark Cline
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-06-13       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.