Literature DB >> 6702813

Height and weight, mammographic features of breast tissue, and breast cancer risk.

J Brisson, A S Morrison, D B Kopans, N L Sadowsky, L Kalisher, J A Twaddle, J E Meyer, C I Henschke, P Cole.   

Abstract

A case-control study was conducted to evaluate the association of body size with morphologic features of breast tissue visible on mammograms, and to analyze the interrelations of these factors with breast cancer risk. The cases were 362 women with newly diagnosed breast cancer identified in 1978-1979 in three large hospital-based xeromammography units in Boston, Massachusetts, and one unit in Livingston, New Jersey. The controls were 686 women referred to these units in the same period for a "routine" mammogram. The parenchymal pattern (N1, P1, P2, DY) and the per cent of the breast showing nodular densities were the principal mammographic features assessed. Among controls, body weight was strongly but inversely associated with the per cent of women who had the high risk P2 or DY patterns and with the mean per cent of the breast showing nodular densities. Body weight and the amount of nodular densities were both directly related to breast cancer risk. The strengths of the relations of body weight and of nodular densities to risk were each increased when the other factor was taken into account.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6702813     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  40 in total

Review 1.  Mammographic densities as a marker of human breast cancer risk and their use in chemoprevention.

Authors:  N F Boyd; L J Martin; J Stone; C Greenberg; S Minkin; M J Yaffe
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 2.  Breast tissue composition and susceptibility to breast cancer.

Authors:  Norman F Boyd; Lisa J Martin; Michael Bronskill; Martin J Yaffe; Neb Duric; Salomon Minkin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Associations of physical activity, sedentary time, and insulin with percent breast density in Hispanic women.

Authors:  Kathleen Y Wolin; Laura A Colangelo; Brian C-H Chiu; Barbara Ainsworth; Robert Chatterton; Susan M Gapstur
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Association between mammographic density and age-related lobular involution of the breast.

Authors:  Karthik Ghosh; Lynn C Hartmann; Carol Reynolds; Daniel W Visscher; Kathleen R Brandt; Robert A Vierkant; Christopher G Scott; Derek C Radisky; Thomas A Sellers; V Shane Pankratz; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Reproducibility of BI-RADS breast density measures among community radiologists: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Mary C Spayne; Charlotte C Gard; Joan Skelly; Diana L Miglioretti; Pamela M Vacek; Berta M Geller
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 6.  The contribution of dynamic stromal remodeling during mammary development to breast carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Jessica McCready; Lisa M Arendt; Jenny A Rudnick; Charlotte Kuperwasser
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 6.466

7.  Independent association of lobular involution and mammographic breast density with breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Karthik Ghosh; Celine M Vachon; V Shane Pankratz; Robert A Vierkant; Stephanie S Anderson; Kathleen R Brandt; Daniel W Visscher; Carol Reynolds; Marlene H Frost; Lynn C Hartmann
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 8.  Clinical management of women at increased risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  V G Vogel; A Yeomans; E Higginbotham
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Cellular proliferative activity of mammographic normal dense and fatty tissue determined by DNA S phase percentage.

Authors:  P C Stomper; R B Penetrante; S B Edge; M A Arredondo; L E Blumenson; C C Stewart
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 10.  Mammographic density.

Authors:  Norman F Boyd; Lisa J Martin; Martin Yaffe; Salomon Minkin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.