Literature DB >> 18583470

Effect of raloxifene on mammographic density and breast magnetic resonance imaging in premenopausal women at increased risk for breast cancer.

Jennifer Eng-Wong1, Jennifer Orzano-Birgani, Catherine K Chow, David Venzon, Jianhua Yao, Claudia E Galbo, Jo Anne Zujewski, Sheila Prindiville.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mammographic density is a risk factor for breast cancer. Mammographic density and breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) volume (MRIV) assess the amount of fibroglandular tissue in the breast. Mammographic density and MRIV can be modulated with hormonal interventions, suggesting that these imaging modalities may be useful as surrogate endpoint biomarkers for breast cancer chemoprevention trials. We evaluated the effect of raloxifene on mammographic density and MRIV in premenopausal women at increased risk for breast cancer.
METHODS: Mammograms and MRI were obtained at baseline and after 1 and 2 years of 60 mg raloxifene by mouth daily for 27 premenopausal women. Mammographic percent dense area was calculated using a semiquantitative thresholding technique. T(1)-weighted spoiled gradient-echo MRI with fat suppression was used to determine breast MRIV using a semiautomatic method. Mean change in mammographic density and median change in MRIV were assessed by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
RESULTS: No significant change in mammographic density was seen after treatment with raloxifene. Mean change after 1 year was 1% [95% confidence interval (95% CI), -3 to +5] and after 2 years was 1% (95% CI, -2 to +5). MRIV decreased on raloxifene. Median relative change in MRIV after 1 year was -17% (95% CI, -28 to -9; P = 0.0017) and after 2 years was -16% (95% CI, -31 to -4; P = 0.0004).
CONCLUSIONS: In high-risk premenopausal women, mammographic density did not change on raloxifene, whereas MRIV significantly declined. Our findings suggest that MRIV is a promising surrogate biomarker in premenopausal women at increased risk for breast cancer and should be investigated further in breast cancer prevention trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18583470      PMCID: PMC2586886          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2752

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  32 in total

1.  Growth factors and stromal matrix proteins associated with mammographic densities.

Authors:  Y P Guo; L J Martin; W Hanna; D Banerjee; N Miller; E Fishell; R Khokha; N F Boyd
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  A longitudinal study of the effects of menopause on mammographic features.

Authors:  Norman Boyd; Lisa Martin; Jennifer Stone; Laurie Little; Salomon Minkin; Martin Yaffe
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Postmenopausal hormone therapy and change in mammographic density.

Authors:  Gail A Greendale; Beth A Reboussin; Stacey Slone; Carol Wasilauskas; Malcolm C Pike; Giske Ursin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Association of abnormal nipple aspirate cytology and mammographic pattern and density.

Authors:  M M Lee; N L Petrakis; M R Wrensch; E B King; R Miike; E Sickles
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Digitized mammography: a clinical trial of postmenopausal women randomly assigned to receive raloxifene, estrogen, or placebo.

Authors:  M Freedman; J San Martin; J O'Gorman; S Eckert; M E Lippman; S C Lo; E L Walls; J Zeng
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-01-03       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Projecting absolute invasive breast cancer risk in white women with a model that includes mammographic density.

Authors:  Jinbo Chen; David Pee; Rajeev Ayyagari; Barry Graubard; Catherine Schairer; Celia Byrne; Jacques Benichou; Mitchell H Gail
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Tamoxifen and mammographic breast densities.

Authors:  J Brisson; B Brisson; G Coté; E Maunsell; S Bérubé; J Robert
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Effect of tamoxifen on mammographic density.

Authors:  C K Chow; D Venzon; E C Jones; A Premkumar; J O'Shaughnessy; J Zujewski
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Mammographic changes associated with raloxifene and tibolone therapy in postmenopausal women: a prospective study.

Authors:  George E Christodoulakos; Irene V Lambrinoudaki; Athina D Vourtsi; Konstantinos P C Panoulis; Dimitrios A Kelekis; George C Creatsas
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  Heritability of mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer.

Authors:  Norman F Boyd; Gillian S Dite; Jennifer Stone; Anoma Gunasekara; Dallas R English; Margaret R E McCredie; Graham G Giles; David Tritchler; Anna Chiarelli; Martin J Yaffe; John L Hopper
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-09-19       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  33 in total

Review 1.  Clinical and epidemiological issues in mammographic density.

Authors:  Valentina Assi; Jane Warwick; Jack Cuzick; Stephen W Duffy
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Consistency of breast density measured from the same women using different MR scanners.

Authors:  J-H Chen; S Chan; D H-E Chang; M Lin; M-Y Su
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Comparison of breast density measured on MR images acquired using fat-suppressed versus nonfat-suppressed sequences.

Authors:  Daniel H-E Chang; Jeon-Hor Chen; Muqing Lin; Shadfar Bahri; Hon J Yu; Rita S Mehta; Ke Nie; David J B Hsiang; Orhan Nalcioglu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 4.  Pearls and pitfalls in breast MRI.

Authors:  I Millet; E Pages; D Hoa; S Merigeaud; F Curros Doyon; X Prat; P Taourel
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Impact of menopausal status on background parenchymal enhancement and fibroglandular tissue on breast MRI.

Authors:  Valencia King; Yajia Gu; Jennifer B Kaplan; Jennifer D Brooks; Malcolm C Pike; Elizabeth A Morris
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Double-Blind Randomized 12-Month Soy Intervention Had No Effects on Breast MRI Fibroglandular Tissue Density or Mammographic Density.

Authors:  Anna H Wu; Darcy Spicer; Agustin Garcia; Chiu-Chen Tseng; Linda Hovanessian-Larsen; Pulin Sheth; Sue Ellen Martin; Debra Hawes; Christy Russell; Heather MacDonald; Debu Tripathy; Min-Ying Su; Giske Ursin; Malcolm C Pike
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2015-08-14

7.  Consistency of breast density measured from the same women in four different MR scanners.

Authors:  Jeon-Hor Chen; Siwa Chan; Yi-Jui Liu; Dah-Cherng Yeh; Chih-Kai Chang; Li-Kuang Chen; Wei-Fan Pan; Chih-Chen Kuo; Muqing Lin; Daniel H E Chang; Peter T Fwu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Impact of skin removal on quantitative measurement of breast density using MRI.

Authors:  Ke Nie; Daniel Chang; Jeon-Hor Chen; Tzu-Ching Shih; Chieh-Chih Hsu; Orhan Nalcioglu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Comparative study of density analysis using automated whole breast ultrasound and MRI.

Authors:  Woo Kyung Moon; Yi-Wei Shen; Chiun-Sheng Huang; Sheng-Chy Luo; Aida Kuzucan; Jeon-Hor Chen; Ruey-Feng Chang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Menstrual cycle-related fluctuations in breast density measured by using three-dimensional MR imaging.

Authors:  Siwa Chan; Min-Ying L Su; Fu-Ju Lei; Jia-Pei Wu; Muqing Lin; Orhan Nalcioglu; Stephen A Feig; Jeon-Hor Chen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.