Literature DB >> 28698185

Age at Menarche and Late Adolescent Adiposity Associated with Mammographic Density on Processed Digital Mammograms in 24,840 Women.

Stacey E Alexeeff1, Nnaemeka U Odo2,3, Jafi A Lipson4, Ninah Achacoso5, Joseph H Rothstein6,7, Martin J Yaffe8, Rhea Y Liang4, Luana Acton5, Valerie McGuire9, Alice S Whittemore9,10, Daniel L Rubin4,10, Weiva Sieh6,7, Laurel A Habel5,9.   

Abstract

Background: High mammographic density is strongly associated with increased breast cancer risk. Some, but not all, risk factors for breast cancer are also associated with higher mammographic density.
Methods: The study cohort (N = 24,840) was drawn from the Research Program in Genes, Environment and Health of Kaiser Permanente Northern California and included non-Hispanic white females ages 40 to 74 years with a full-field digital mammogram (FFDM). Percent density (PD) and dense area (DA) were measured by a radiological technologist using Cumulus. The association of age at menarche and late adolescent body mass index (BMI) with PD and DA were modeled using linear regression adjusted for confounders.
Results: Age at menarche and late adolescent BMI were negatively correlated. Age at menarche was positively associated with PD (P value for trend <0.0001) and DA (P value for trend <0.0001) in fully adjusted models. Compared with the reference category of ages 12 to 13 years at menarche, menarche at age >16 years was associated with an increase in PD of 1.47% (95% CI, 0.69-2.25) and an increase in DA of 1.59 cm2 (95% CI, 0.48-2.70). Late adolescent BMI was inversely associated with PD (P < 0.0001) and DA (P < 0.0001) in fully adjusted models.Conclusions: Age at menarche and late adolescent BMI are both associated with Cumulus measures of mammographic density on processed FFDM images.Impact: Age at menarche and late adolescent BMI may act through different pathways. The long-term effects of age at menarche on cancer risk may be mediated through factors besides mammographic density. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(9); 1450-8. ©2017 AACR. ©2017 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28698185      PMCID: PMC5659765          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  46 in total

1.  The association of measured breast tissue characteristics with mammographic density and other risk factors for breast cancer.

Authors:  Tong Li; Limei Sun; Naomi Miller; Trudey Nicklee; Jennifer Woo; Lee Hulse-Smith; Ming-Sound Tsao; Rama Khokha; Lisa Martin; Norman Boyd
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Breast cancer risk factors and mammographic breast density in women over age 70.

Authors:  Francesmary Modugno; Duyen L Ngo; Glenn O Allen; Lewis H Kuller; Roberta B Ness; Victor G Vogel; Joseph P Costantino; Jane A Cauley
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2005-12-16       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Adolescence and breast carcinoma risk.

Authors:  C S Berkey; A L Frazier; J D Gardner; G A Colditz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Family social class, maternal body mass index, childhood body mass index, and age at menarche as predictors of adult obesity.

Authors:  J Laitinen; C Power; M R Järvelin
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 5.  Mammographic breast density as an intermediate phenotype for breast cancer.

Authors:  Norman F Boyd; Johanna M Rommens; Kelly Vogt; Vivian Lee; John L Hopper; Martin J Yaffe; Andrew D Paterson
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Different types of postmenopausal hormone therapy and mammographic density in Norwegian women.

Authors:  Yngve Bremnes; Giske Ursin; Nils Bjurstam; Eiliv Lund; Inger Torhild Gram
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Breast cancer risk factors in relation to breast density (United States).

Authors:  Linda Titus-Ernstoff; Anna N A Tosteson; Claudia Kasales; Julia Weiss; Martha Goodrich; Elizabeth E Hatch; Patricia A Carney
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.506

8.  The relationship of anthropometric measures to radiological features of the breast in premenopausal women.

Authors:  N F Boyd; G A Lockwood; J W Byng; L E Little; M J Yaffe; D L Tritchler
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Mammographic density is related to stroma and stromal proteoglycan expression.

Authors:  Salem Alowami; Sandra Troup; Sahar Al-Haddad; Iain Kirkpatrick; Peter H Watson
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2003-07-23       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: a mediation analysis.

Authors:  Megan S Rice; Kimberly A Bertrand; Tyler J VanderWeele; Bernard A Rosner; Xiaomei Liao; Hans-Olov Adami; Rulla M Tamimi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Reproductive Factors and Mammographic Density: Associations Among 24,840 Women and Comparison of Studies Using Digitized Film-Screen Mammography and Full-Field Digital Mammography.

Authors:  Stacey E Alexeeff; Nnaemeka U Odo; Russell McBride; Valerie McGuire; Ninah Achacoso; Joseph H Rothstein; Jafi A Lipson; Rhea Y Liang; Luana Acton; Martin J Yaffe; Alice S Whittemore; Daniel L Rubin; Weiva Sieh; Laurel A Habel
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Associations of Oral Contraceptives with Mammographic Breast Density in Premenopausal Women.

Authors:  Lusine Yaghjyan; Carmen Smotherman; John Heine; Graham A Colditz; Bernard Rosner; Rulla M Tamimi
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 4.090

3.  Alcohol and Tobacco Use in Relation to Mammographic Density in 23,456 Women.

Authors:  Laurel A Habel; Weiva Sieh; Russell B McBride; Kezhen Fei; Joseph H Rothstein; Stacey E Alexeeff; Xiaoyu Song; Lori C Sakoda; Valerie McGuire; Ninah Achacoso; Luana Acton; Rhea Y Liang; Jafi A Lipson; Martin J Yaffe; Daniel L Rubin; Alice S Whittemore
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Do Birth Weight and Weight Gain During Infancy and Early Childhood Explain Variation in Mammographic Density in Women in Midlife? Results From Cohort and Sibling Analyses.

Authors:  Mary Beth Terry; Barbara A Cohn; Mandy Goldberg; Julie D Flom; Ying Wei; Lauren C Houghton; Parisa Tehranifar; Jasmine A McDonald; Angeline Protacio; Piera Cirillo; Karin B Michels
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 5.  The epidemiologic factors associated with breast density: A review.

Authors:  Dong-Man Ye; Tao Yu
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 1.985

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.