Literature DB >> 11934955

Epidemiological study to investigate potential interaction between physical and psychosocial factors at work that may increase the risk of symptoms of musculoskeletal disorder of the neck and upper limb.

J J Devereux1, I G Vlachonikolis, P W Buckle.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate potential interactions between physical and psychosocial risk factors in the workplace that may be associated with symptoms of musculoskeletal disorder of the neck and upper limb.
METHODS: 891 of 1514 manual handlers, delivery drivers, technicians, customer services computer operators, and general office staff reported on physical and psychosocial working conditions and symptoms of neck and upper limb disorders using a self administered questionnaire (59% return rate). Of the 869 valid questionnaire respondents, 564 workers were classified in to one of four exposure groups: high physical and high psychosocial, high physical and low psychosocial, low physical and high psychosocial, and low physical and low psychosocial. Low physical and low psychosocial was used as an internal reference group. The exposure criteria were derived from the existing epidemiological literature and models for physical and psychosocial work factors. The frequency and amplitude of lifting and the duration spent sitting while experiencing vibration were used as physical exposure criteria. Ordinal values of mental demands, job control, and social support with managers and coworkers were used as psychosocial exposure criteria.
RESULTS: In the multivariate analyses, the highest and significant increase in risk was found in the high physical and high psychosocial exposure group for symptoms of hand or wrist and upper limb disorders after adjusting for years at the job, age, and sex. A potential interaction effect was found for the symptoms of the hand or wrist and upper limb disorders but not for the neck symptoms.
CONCLUSION: This study showed that workers highly exposed to both physical and psychosocial workplace risk factors were more likely to report symptoms of musculoskeletal disorders than workers highly exposed to one or the other. The results suggest an interaction between physical and psychosocial risk factors in the workplace that increased the risk of reporting symptoms in the upper limbs. Psychosocial risk factors at work were more important when exposure to physical risk factors at work were high than when physical exposure was low. Ergonomic intervention strategies that aim to minimise the risks of work related musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb should not only focus on physical work factors but also psychosocial work factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11934955      PMCID: PMC1740269          DOI: 10.1136/oem.59.4.269

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  44 in total

Review 1.  Physical risk factors for neck pain.

Authors:  G A Ariëns; W van Mechelen; P M Bongers; L M Bouter; G van der Wal
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.024

2.  Possible bias from rating behavior when subjects rate both exposure and outcome.

Authors:  A Toomingas; L Alfredsson; A Kilbom
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.024

3.  The effect of keyboard keyswitch make force on applied force and finger flexor muscle activity.

Authors:  D Rempel; E Serina; E Klinenberg; B J Martin; T J Armstrong; J A Foulke; S Natarajan
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Are occupational drivers at an increased risk for developing musculoskeletal disorders?

Authors:  M L Magnusson; M H Pope; D G Wilder; B Areskoug
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Hand wrist cumulative trauma disorders in industry.

Authors:  B A Silverstein; L J Fine; T J Armstrong
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1986-11

6.  Physical strain in the handling of gas cylinders.

Authors:  D Westerling; A Kilbom
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Proportion of disease attributable to the combined effect of two factors.

Authors:  A M Walker
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 7.196

8.  Work-related musculoskeletal symptoms among car mechanics: a descriptive study.

Authors:  S Torp; T Riise; B E Moen
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 1.611

9.  Upper limb work-related musculoskeletal disorders among newspaper employees: cross-sectional survey results.

Authors:  M F Polanyi; D C Cole; D E Beaton; J Chung; R Wells; M Abdolell; L Beech-Hawley; S E Ferrier; M V Mondloch; S A Shields; J M Smith; H S Shannon
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.214

10.  Musculoskeletal complaints in The Netherlands in relation to age, gender and physically demanding work.

Authors:  B C de Zwart; J P Broersen; M H Frings-Dresen; F J van Dijk
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.015

View more
  48 in total

1.  Workers' assessments of manual lifting tasks: cognitive strategies and validation with respect to objective indices and musculoskeletal symptoms.

Authors:  Simon S Yeung; Ash Genaidy; James Deddens; P C Leung
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 2.  The impact of a computerized work environment on professional occupational groups and behavioural and physiological risk factors for musculoskeletal symptoms: a literature review.

Authors:  Karin Lindgren Griffiths; Martin G Mackey; Barbara J Adamson
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2007-12

3.  Does influence at work modify the relation between high occupational physical activity and risk of heart disease in women?

Authors:  Karen Allesøe; Andreas Holtermann; Reiner Rugulies; Mette Aadahl; Eleanor Boyle; Karen Søgaard
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  Modest associations between self-reported physical workload and neck trouble: a population-based twin control study.

Authors:  Jonas Winkel Holm; Jan Hartvigsen; Svend Lings; Kirsten Ohm Kyvik
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2012-03-18       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  Prevalence, consequences and predictors of low back pain among nurses in a tertiary care setting.

Authors:  Sameh M Abolfotouh; Karim Mahmoud; Khaled Faraj; Gemeh Moammer; Abir ElSayed; Mostafa A Abolfotouh
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-19       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Analysis of occupational stress in a high fashion clothing factory with upper limb biomechanical overload.

Authors:  Laura Forcella; Roberta Bonfiglioli; Piero Cutilli; Eugenio Siciliano; Angela Di Donato; Marta Di Nicola; Andrea Antonucci; Luca Di Giampaolo; Paolo Boscolo; Francesco Saverio Violante
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 3.015

7.  Importance of tissue morphology relative to patient reports of symptoms and functional limitations resulting from median nerve pathology.

Authors:  Shawn C Roll; Kevin D Evans; Xiaobai Li; Carolyn M Sommerich; Jane Case-Smith
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb

8.  A participatory approach to the study of lifting demands and musculoskeletal symptoms among Hong Kong workers.

Authors:  S Yeung; A Genaidy; J Deddens; C Shoaf; P C Leung
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.402

9.  Risk factors for incident neck and shoulder pain in hospital nurses.

Authors:  J Smedley; H Inskip; F Trevelyan; P Buckle; C Cooper; D Coggon
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.402

10.  Workplace psychosocial and organizational factors for neck pain in workers in the United States.

Authors:  Haiou Yang; Edward Hitchcock; Scott Haldeman; Naomi Swanson; Ming-Lun Lu; BongKyoo Choi; Akinori Nakata; Dean Baker
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 2.214

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.