Literature DB >> 9802994

Why faces may be special: evidence of the inversion effect in chimpanzees.

L A Parr1, T Dove, W D Hopkins.   

Abstract

Five chimpanzees were tested on their ability to discriminate faces and automobiles presented in both their upright and inverted orientations. The face stimuli consisted of 30 black and white photographs, 10 each of unfamiliar chimpanzees (Pan troblodytes), brown capuchins (Cebus apella), and humans (Homo sapiens). Ten black and white photographs of automobiles were also used. The stimuli were presented in a sequential matching-to-sample (SMTS) format using a computerized joystick-testing apparatus. Subjects performed better on upright than inverted stimuli in all classes. Performance was significantly better on upright than inverted presentations of chimpanzee and human faces but not on capuchin monkey faces or automobiles. These data support previous studies in humans that suggest the inversion effect occurs for stimuli for which subjects have developed an expertise. Alternative explanations for the inversion effect based on the type of spatial frequency contained in the stimuli are also discussed. These data are the first to provide evidence for the inversion effect using several classes of face stimuli in a great ape species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9802994     DOI: 10.1162/089892998563013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  45 in total

1.  First- and second-order configural sensitivity for greeble stimuli in baboons.

Authors:  Carole Parron; Joël Fagot
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Differential sensitivity to conspecific and allospecific cues in chimpanzees and humans: a comparative eye-tracking study.

Authors:  Yuko Hattori; Fumihiro Kano; Masaki Tomonaga
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Discrimination of faces and houses by rhesus monkeys: the role of stimulus expertise and rotation angle.

Authors:  Lisa A Parr; Matthew Heintz
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 3.084

4.  The perception of two-tone Mooney faces in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; Lisa A Parr
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.065

5.  Visual discrimination of primate species based on faces in chimpanzees.

Authors:  Duncan A Wilson; Masaki Tomonaga
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 2.163

6.  Recognizing facial cues: individual discrimination by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  L A Parr; J T Winslow; W D Hopkins; F B de Waal
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.231

7.  Monkeys recognize the faces of group mates in photographs.

Authors:  Jennifer J Pokorny; Frans B M de Waal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Neural correlates of face and object perception in an awake chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) examined by scalp-surface event-related potentials.

Authors:  Hirokata Fukushima; Satoshi Hirata; Ari Ueno; Goh Matsuda; Kohki Fuwa; Keiko Sugama; Kiyo Kusunoki; Masahiro Hirai; Kazuo Hiraki; Masaki Tomonaga; Toshikazu Hasegawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Human Ability to Recognize Kin Visually Within Primates.

Authors:  Alexandra Alvergne; Elise Huchard; Damien Caillaud; Marie J E Charpentier; Joanna M Setchell; Charlène Ruppli; Delphine Féjan; Laura Martinez; Guy Cowlishaw; Michel Raymond
Journal:  Int J Primatol       Date:  2009-01-31       Impact factor: 2.264

10.  Faces capture the visuospatial attention of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): evidence from a cueing experiment.

Authors:  Masaki Tomonaga; Tomoko Imura
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 3.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.