Literature DB >> 20335197

Differential sensitivity to conspecific and allospecific cues in chimpanzees and humans: a comparative eye-tracking study.

Yuko Hattori1, Fumihiro Kano, Masaki Tomonaga.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that a variety of animals including humans are sensitive to social cues from others and shift their attention to the same objects attended to by others. However, little is known about how animals process conspecifics' and another species' actions, although primates recognize conspecific faces better than those of another species. In this study, using unrestrained eye-tracking techniques, we first demonstrated that conspecific social cues modulated looking behaviours of chimpanzees more than human cues, whereas human observers were equally sensitive to both species. Additionally, first pass gaze duration at the face indicates that chimpanzees looked at the chimpanzees' face longer than the human face, suggesting that chimpanzees might extract more referential information from a conspecific face. These results also imply that a unique ability for extracting referential information from a variety of social objects has emerged during human evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20335197      PMCID: PMC2936142          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  16 in total

1.  The ability to follow eye gaze and its emergence during development in macaque monkeys.

Authors:  P F Ferrari; E Kohler; L Fogassi; V Gallese
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Macaques but not lemurs co-orient visually with humans.

Authors:  J R Anderson; R W Mitchell
Journal:  Folia Primatol (Basel)       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing.

Authors:  G R Loftus; N H Mackworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Human gestures trigger different attentional shifts in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and humans (Homo sapiens).

Authors:  Masaki Tomonaga; Tomoko Imura
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  Gaze following and joint attention in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  N J Emery; E N Lorincz; D I Perrett; M W Oram; C I Baker
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.231

6.  Chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes, follow gaze direction geometrically.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.844

7.  Reflexive social attention in monkeys and humans.

Authors:  Robert O Deaner; Michael L Platt
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2003-09-16       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Is chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) spatial attention reflexively triggered by gaze cue?

Authors:  Masaki Tomonaga
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.231

9.  Five primate species follow the visual gaze of conspecifics.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.844

10.  Humans and macaques employ similar face-processing strategies.

Authors:  Christoph D Dahl; Christian Wallraven; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Nikos K Logothetis
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  24 in total

1.  Visual preferences for sex and status in female rhesus macaques.

Authors:  Karli K Watson; Jason H Ghodasra; Melissa A Furlong; Michael L Platt
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 3.084

2.  The importance of surface-based cues for face discrimination in non-human primates.

Authors:  Lisa A Parr; Jessica Taubert
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Attention holding elicited by direct-gaze faces is reflected in saccadic peak velocity.

Authors:  Mario Dalmaso; Luigi Castelli; Giovanni Galfano
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Eye-tracking with nonhuman primates is now more accessible than ever before.

Authors:  Christopher J Machado; Eric E Nelson
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 2.371

5.  Using cross correlations to investigate how chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) use conspecific gaze cues to extract and exploit information in a foraging competition.

Authors:  Katie Hall; Mike W Oram; Matthew W Campbell; Timothy M Eppley; Richard W Byrne; Frans B M De Waal
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 2.371

6.  Humans and chimpanzees attend differently to goal-directed actions.

Authors:  Masako Myowa-Yamakoshi; Céline Scola; Satoshi Hirata
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  The application of noninvasive, restraint-free eye-tracking methods for use with nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Lydia M Hopper; Roberto A Gulli; Lauren H Howard; Fumihiro Kano; Christopher Krupenye; Amy M Ryan; Annika Paukner
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-06

8.  Differences in the mutual eye gaze of bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Authors:  Michele M Mulholland; Lindsay M Mahovetz; Mary Catherine Mareno; Lisa A Reamer; Steven J Schapiro; William D Hopkins
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.231

9.  Chimpanzees gesture to humans in mirrors: using reflection to dissociate seeing from line of gaze.

Authors:  Robert Lurz; Carla Krachun; Lindsay Mahovetz; McLennon J G Wilson; William Hopkins
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 2.844

10.  Ravens (Corvus corax) are indifferent to the gains of conspecific recipients or human partners in experimental tasks.

Authors:  Felice Di Lascio; François Nyffeler; Redouan Bshary; Thomas Bugnyar
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 3.084

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.