Literature DB >> 9774646

Persistent interactions of core histone tails with nucleosomal DNA following acetylation and transcription factor binding.

V Mutskov1, D Gerber, D Angelov, J Ausio, J Workman, S Dimitrov.   

Abstract

In this study, we examined the effect of acetylation of the NH2 tails of core histones on their binding to nucleosomal DNA in the absence or presence of bound transcription factors. To do this, we used a novel UV laser-induced protein-DNA cross-linking technique, combined with immunochemical and molecular biology approaches. Nucleosomes containing one or five GAL4 binding sites were reconstituted with hypoacetylated or hyperacetylated core histones. Within these reconstituted particles, UV laser-induced histone-DNA cross-linking was found to occur only via the nonstructured histone tails and thus presented a unique tool for studying histone tail interactions with nucleosomal DNA. Importantly, these studies demonstrated that the NH2 tails were not released from nucleosomal DNA upon histone acetylation, although some weakening of their interactions was observed at elevated ionic strengths. Moreover, the binding of up to five GAL4-AH dimers to nucleosomes occupying the central 90 bp occurred without displacement of the histone NH2 tails from DNA. GAL4-AH binding perturbed the interaction of each histone tail with nucleosomal DNA to different degrees. However, in all cases, greater than 50% of the interactions between the histone tails and DNA was retained upon GAL4-AH binding, even if the tails were highly acetylated. These data illustrate an interaction of acetylated or nonacetylated histone tails with DNA that persists in the presence of simultaneously bound transcription factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9774646      PMCID: PMC109216          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.18.11.6293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  74 in total

1.  Role for N-CoR and histone deacetylase in Sin3-mediated transcriptional repression.

Authors:  L Alland; R Muhle; H Hou; J Potes; L Chin; N Schreiber-Agus; R A DePinho
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-05-01       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Fine resolution of histones by two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis: developmental implications.

Authors:  S I Dimitrov; A P Wolffe
Journal:  Methods       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.608

3.  The transcriptional coactivators p300 and CBP are histone acetyltransferases.

Authors:  V V Ogryzko; R L Schiltz; V Russanova; B H Howard; Y Nakatani
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-11-29       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 4.  What's up and down with histone deacetylation and transcription?

Authors:  M J Pazin; J T Kadonaga
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1997-05-02       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Repression by Ume6 involves recruitment of a complex containing Sin3 corepressor and Rpd3 histone deacetylase to target promoters.

Authors:  D Kadosh; K Struhl
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1997-05-02       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 6.  Histone acetylation: chromatin in action.

Authors:  P A Wade; D Pruss; A P Wolffe
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 13.807

7.  A complex containing N-CoR, mSin3 and histone deacetylase mediates transcriptional repression.

Authors:  T Heinzel; R M Lavinsky; T M Mullen; M Söderstrom; C D Laherty; J Torchia; W M Yang; G Brard; S D Ngo; J R Davie; E Seto; R N Eisenman; D W Rose; C K Glass; M G Rosenfeld
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-05-01       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The CBP co-activator is a histone acetyltransferase.

Authors:  A J Bannister; T Kouzarides
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996 Dec 19-26       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  The TAF(II)250 subunit of TFIID has histone acetyltransferase activity.

Authors:  C A Mizzen; X J Yang; T Kokubo; J E Brownell; A J Bannister; T Owen-Hughes; J Workman; L Wang; S L Berger; T Kouzarides; Y Nakatani; C D Allis
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-12-27       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  UV-laser crosslinking of proteins to DNA.

Authors:  T Moss; S I Dimitrov; D Houde
Journal:  Methods       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.608

View more
  53 in total

Review 1.  Modifications of the histone N-terminal domains. Evidence for an "epigenetic code"?

Authors:  A Imhof; P B Becker
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.695

2.  Core histone N-termini play an essential role in mitotic chromosome condensation.

Authors:  A E de la Barre; V Gerson; S Gout; M Creaven; C D Allis; S Dimitrov
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  The N-terminus of histone H2B, but not that of histone H3 or its phosphorylation, is essential for chromosome condensation.

Authors:  A E de la Barre; D Angelov; A Molla; S Dimitrov
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  Preferential interaction of the core histone tail domains with linker DNA.

Authors:  D Angelov; J M Vitolo; V Mutskov; S Dimitrov; J J Hayes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-05-29       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The barrier function of an insulator couples high histone acetylation levels with specific protection of promoter DNA from methylation.

Authors:  Vesco J Mutskov; Catherine M Farrell; Paul A Wade; Alan P Wolffe; Gary Felsenfeld
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  Histone variant H2ABbd confers lower stability to the nucleosome.

Authors:  Thierry Gautier; D Wade Abbott; Annie Molla; Andre Verdel; Juan Ausio; Stefan Dimitrov
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2004-06-11       Impact factor: 8.807

7.  SWI/SNF remodeling and p300-dependent transcription of histone variant H2ABbd nucleosomal arrays.

Authors:  Dimitar Angelov; André Verdel; Woojin An; Vladimir Bondarenko; Fabienne Hans; Cécile-Marie Doyen; Vassily M Studitsky; Ali Hamiche; Robert G Roeder; Philippe Bouvet; Stefan Dimitrov
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2004-09-16       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 8.  The role of histone acetylation in memory formation and cognitive impairments.

Authors:  Lucia Peixoto; Ted Abel
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 9.  Dynamic nucleosomes.

Authors:  Karolin Luger
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.239

10.  Multiscale modeling of nucleosome dynamics.

Authors:  Shantanu Sharma; Feng Ding; Nikolay V Dokholyan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.