Literature DB >> 9755136

Human exposure assessment and the National Toxicology Program.

G W Lucier1, A Schecter.   

Abstract

The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences/National Toxicology Program (NIEHS/NTP) is developing a new interagency initiative in exposure assessment. This initiative involves the NIEHS, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention through its National Center for Environmental Health, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, the EPA, and other participating institutes and agencies of the NTP. This initiative will benefit public health and priority setting in a number of ways. First, as discussed above, it will strengthen the scientific foundation for risk assessments by the development of more credible exposure/response relationships in people by improving cross-species extrapolation, the development of biologically based dose-response models, and the identification of sensitive subpopulations and for "margin of exposure" based estimates of risk. Second, it will provide the kind of information necessary for deciding which chemicals should be studied with the limited resources available for toxicological testing. For example, there are 85,000 chemicals in commerce today, and the NTP can only provide toxicological evaluations on 10-20 per year. Third, we would use the information obtained from the exposure initiative to focus our research on mixtures that are actually present in people's bodies. Fourth, we would obtain information on the kinds and amount of chemicals in children and other potentially sensitive subpopulations. Determinations of whether additional safety factors need to be applied to children must rest, in part, upon comparative exposure analyses between children and adults. Fifth, this initiative, taken together with the environmental genome initiative, will provide the science base essential for meaningful studies on gene/environment interactions, particularly for strengthening the evaluation of epidemiology studies. Sixth, efficacy of public health policies aimed at reducing human exposure to chemical agents could be evaluated in a more meaningful way if body burden data were available over time, including remediation around Superfund sites and efforts to achieve environmental justice. The exposure assessment initiative is needed to address public health needs. It is feasible because of recent advances in analytical technology and molecular biology, and it is an example of how different agencies can work together to better fulfill their respective missions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9755136      PMCID: PMC1533173          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.106-1533173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  12 in total

Review 1.  An introduction to the National Human Exposure Assessment Survey (NHEXAS) and related phase I field studies.

Authors:  K Sexton; D E Kleffman; M A Callahan
Journal:  J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol       Date:  1995 Jul-Sep

2.  Environment institute lays plans for gene hunt.

Authors:  J Kaiser
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-10-24       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Trends of PCB, hexachlorobenzene, and beta-benzene hexachloride levels in the adipose tissue of the U.S. population.

Authors:  P E Robinson; G A Mack; J Remmers; R Levy; L Mohadjer
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 6.498

4.  Concentrations of tetrachloroethene in blood and trichloroacetic acid in urine in workers and neighbours of dry-cleaning shops.

Authors:  W Popp; G Müller; B Baltes-Schmitz; B Wehner; C Vahrenholz; W Schmieding; M Benninghoff; K Norpoth
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  An investigation of indoor air contamination in residences above dry cleaners.

Authors:  J S Schreiber; S House; E Prohonic; G Smead; C Hudson; M Styk; J Lauber
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.000

6.  The decline in blood lead levels in the United States. The National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES)

Authors:  J L Pirkle; D J Brody; E W Gunter; R A Kramer; D C Paschal; K M Flegal; T D Matte
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-07-27       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Risk assessment: good science for good decisions.

Authors:  G W Lucier
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Update on national toxicology program (NTP) assays with genetically altered or "transgenic" mice.

Authors:  J R Bucher
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 9.  Developmental effects of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in wildlife and humans.

Authors:  T Colborn; F S vom Saal; A M Soto
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  The priority toxicant reference range study: interim report.

Authors:  L L Needham; R H Hill; D L Ashley; J L Pirkle; E J Sampson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  7 in total

1.  Improving the environmental quality component of the County Health Rankings model.

Authors:  Michael Hendryx; Melissa M Ahern; Keith J Zullig
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Environmental justice in the context of commuters' exposure to CO and PM10 in Bangalore, India.

Authors:  Ashwin Sabapathy; Sumeet Saksena; Peter Flachsbart
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 5.563

3.  Epigenetic mechanisms of mouse interstrain variability in genotoxicity of the environmental toxicant 1,3-butadiene.

Authors:  Igor Koturbash; Anne Scherhag; Jessica Sorrentino; Kenneth Sexton; Wanda Bodnar; James A Swenberg; Frederick A Beland; Fernando Pardo-Manuel Devillena; Ivan Rusyn; Igor P Pogribny
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 4.  Application of genomics to toxicology research.

Authors:  Russell S Thomas; David R Rank; Sharron G Penn; Gina M Zastrow; Kevin R Hayes; Tianhua Hu; Kalyan Pande; Mark Lewis; Stevan B Jovanovich; Christopher A Bradfield
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Public health policy and the National Toxicology Program.

Authors:  G W Lucier; J C Barrett
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Levels of methyleugenol in a subset of adults in the general U.S. population as determined by high resolution mass spectrometry.

Authors:  D B Barr; J R Barr; S L Bailey; C R Lapeza; M D Beeson; S P Caudill; V L Maggio; A Schecter; S A Masten; G W Lucier; L L Needham; E J Sampson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 7.  Priorities for development of research methods in occupational cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Ward; Paul A Schulte; Steve Bayard; Aaron Blair; Paul Brandt-Rauf; Mary Ann Butler; David Dankovic; Ann F Hubbs; Carol Jones; Myra Karstadt; Gregory L Kedderis; Ronald Melnick; Carrie A Redlich; Nathaniel Rothman; Russell E Savage; Michael Sprinker; Mark Toraason; Ainsley Weston; Andrew F Olshan; Patricia Stewart; Sheila Hoar Zahm
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.031

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.