Literature DB >> 12524210

Priorities for development of research methods in occupational cancer.

Elizabeth M Ward1, Paul A Schulte, Steve Bayard, Aaron Blair, Paul Brandt-Rauf, Mary Ann Butler, David Dankovic, Ann F Hubbs, Carol Jones, Myra Karstadt, Gregory L Kedderis, Ronald Melnick, Carrie A Redlich, Nathaniel Rothman, Russell E Savage, Michael Sprinker, Mark Toraason, Ainsley Weston, Andrew F Olshan, Patricia Stewart, Sheila Hoar Zahm.   

Abstract

Occupational cancer research methods was identified in 1996 as 1 of 21 priority research areas in the National Occupational Research Agenda (NORA). To implement NORA, teams of experts from various sectors were formed and given the charge to further define research needs and develop strategies to enhance or augment research in each priority area. This article is a product of that process. Focus on occupational cancer research methods is important both because occupational factors play a significant role in a number of cancers, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality, and also because occupational cohorts (because of higher exposure levels) often provide unique opportunities to evaluate health effects of environmental toxicants and understand the carcinogenic process in humans. Despite an explosion of new methods for cancer research in general, these have not been widely applied to occupational cancer research. In this article we identify needs and gaps in occupational cancer research methods in four broad areas: identification of occupational carcinogens, design of epidemiologic studies, risk assessment, and primary and secondary prevention. Progress in occupational cancer will require interdisciplinary research involving epidemiologists, industrial hygienists, toxicologists, and molecular biologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12524210      PMCID: PMC1241299          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.111-1241299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  98 in total

1.  Occupation and leukemia mortality among men in 16 states: 1985-1987.

Authors:  D P Loomis; D A Savitz
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.214

2.  Cancer mortality in workers exposed to phenoxy herbicides, chlorophenols, and dioxins. An expanded and updated international cohort study.

Authors:  M Kogevinas; H Becher; T Benn; P A Bertazzi; P Boffetta; H B Bueno-de-Mesquita; D Coggon; D Colin; D Flesch-Janys; M Fingerhut; L Green; T Kauppinen; M Littorin; E Lynge; J D Mathews; M Neuberger; N Pearce; R Saracci
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1997-06-15       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Using occupational mortality data for surveillance of work-related diseases of women.

Authors:  C A Burnett; M Dosemeci
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1994-11

4.  The role of dermal irritation in the skin tumor promoting activity of petroleum middle distillates.

Authors:  C S Nessel; J J Freeman; R C Forgash; R H McKee
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Trichloroethylene-induced mouse lung tumors: studies of the mode of action and comparisons between species.

Authors:  T Green; G W Mainwaring; J R Foster
Journal:  Fundam Appl Toxicol       Date:  1997-06

6.  Risk of breast cancer and organochlorine exposure.

Authors:  M S Wolff; A Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; N Dubin; P Toniolo
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Availability of epidemiologic data for chemicals known to cause cancer in animals: an update.

Authors:  M Karstadt
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.214

Review 8.  Current magnitude of occupational disease in the United States. Estimates from New York State.

Authors:  P J Landrigan; S Markowitz
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 9.  Parental occupation and childhood cancer: review of epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  D A Savitz; J H Chen
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  The carcinogenesis bioassay in perspective: application in identifying human cancer hazards.

Authors:  V A Fung; J C Barrett; J Huff
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  13 in total

1.  Agreement in Occupational Exposures Between Men and Women Using Retrospective Assessments by Expert Coders.

Authors:  Aude Lacourt; France Labrèche; Mark S Goldberg; Jack Siemiatycki; Jérôme Lavoué
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 2.179

2.  Two Suspected Worksite or Occupational Cancer Clusters Investigated Using the Cancer Data Registry and Multiple Primary Standardized Incidence Ratios in SEER *Stat-Idaho, 2013-2014.

Authors:  Mariana Rosenthal; Christopher J Johnson; Steve Scoppa; Kris Carter
Journal:  J Registry Manag       Date:  2016

3.  Investing in prospective cohorts for etiologic study of occupational exposures.

Authors:  A Blair; C J Hines; K W Thomas; M C R Alavanja; L E Beane Freeman; J A Hoppin; F Kamel; C F Lynch; J H Lubin; D T Silverman; E Whelan; S H Zahm; D P Sandler
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.214

Review 4.  Environmental toxins; their impact on children's health.

Authors:  J Grigg
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  Susceptibility to DNA damage in workers occupationally exposed to pesticides, to tannery chemicals and to coal dust during mining.

Authors:  Katia Kvitko; Eliane Bandinelli; João A P Henriques; Vanina D Heuser; Paula Rohr; Fernanda R da Silva; Naye Balzan Schneider; Simone Fernandes; Camile Ancines; Juliana da Silva
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 1.771

6.  A retrospective assessment of occupational exposure to elemental carbon in the U.S. trucking industry.

Authors:  Mary E Davis; Jaime E Hart; Francine Laden; Eric Garshick; Thomas J Smith
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Priority Setting for Occupational Cancer Prevention.

Authors:  Cheryl E Peters; Alison L Palmer; Joanne Telfer; Calvin B Ge; Amy L Hall; Hugh W Davies; Manisha Pahwa; Paul A Demers
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2017-07-20

8.  Longer rodent bioassay fails to address 2-year bioassay's flaws.

Authors:  Joseph Manuppello; Catherine Willett
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Applying new biotechnologies to the study of occupational cancer--a workshop summary.

Authors:  Mark Toraason; Richard Albertini; Steven Bayard; William Bigbee; Aaron Blair; Paolo Boffetta; Stefano Bonassi; Steven Chanock; David Christiani; David Eastmond; Samuel Hanash; Carol Henry; Fred Kadlubar; Frank Mirer; Daniel Nebert; Stephen Rapport; Kathleen Rest; Nathaniel Rothman; Avima Ruder; Russell Savage; Paul Schulte; Jack Siemiatycki; Peter Shields; Martyn Smith; Paige Tolbert; Roel Vermeulen; Paolo Vineis; Sholom Wacholder; Elizabeth Ward; Michael Waters; Ainsley Weston
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Father's occupational exposure to carcinogenic agents and childhood acute leukemia: a new method to assess exposure (a case-control study).

Authors:  Maria Luisa Perez-Saldivar; Manuel Carlos Ortega-Alvarez; Arturo Fajardo-Gutierrez; Roberto Bernaldez-Rios; Maria de Los Angeles Del Campo-Martinez; Aurora Medina-Sanson; Miguel Angel Palomo-Colli; Rogelio Paredes-Aguilera; Armando Martínez-Avalos; Victor Hugo Borja-Aburto; Maria de Jesus Rodriguez-Rivera; Victor Manuel Vargas-Garcia; Jesus Zarco-Contreras; Janet Flores-Lujano; Juan Manuel Mejia-Arangure
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.