OBJECTIVES: We examined the association between environmental quality measures and health outcomes by using the County Health Rankings data, and tested whether a revised environmental quality measure for 1 state could improve the models. METHODS: We conducted state-by-state, county-level linear regression analyses to determine how often the model's 4 health determinants (social and economic factors, health behaviors, clinical care, and physical environment) were associated with mortality and morbidity outcomes. We then developed a revised measure of environmental quality for West Virginia, and tested whether the revised measure was superior to the original measure. RESULTS: Measures of social and economic conditions, and health behaviors, were related to health outcomes in 58% to 88% of state models; measures of environmental quality were related to outcomes in 0% to 8% of models. In West Virginia, the original measure of environmental quality was unrelated to any of the 8 health outcome measures, but the revised measure was significantly related to all 8. CONCLUSIONS: The County Health Rankings model underestimates the impact of the physical environment on public health outcomes. Suggestions for other data sources that may contribute to improved measurement of the physical environment are provided.
OBJECTIVES: We examined the association between environmental quality measures and health outcomes by using the County Health Rankings data, and tested whether a revised environmental quality measure for 1 state could improve the models. METHODS: We conducted state-by-state, county-level linear regression analyses to determine how often the model's 4 health determinants (social and economic factors, health behaviors, clinical care, and physical environment) were associated with mortality and morbidity outcomes. We then developed a revised measure of environmental quality for West Virginia, and tested whether the revised measure was superior to the original measure. RESULTS: Measures of social and economic conditions, and health behaviors, were related to health outcomes in 58% to 88% of state models; measures of environmental quality were related to outcomes in 0% to 8% of models. In West Virginia, the original measure of environmental quality was unrelated to any of the 8 health outcome measures, but the revised measure was significantly related to all 8. CONCLUSIONS: The County Health Rankings model underestimates the impact of the physical environment on public health outcomes. Suggestions for other data sources that may contribute to improved measurement of the physical environment are provided.
Authors: Paul E Peppard; David A Kindig; Elizabeth Dranger; Amanda Jovaag; Patrick L Remington Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2008-01-02 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: M A Palmer; E S Bernhardt; W H Schlesinger; K N Eshleman; E Foufoula-Georgiou; M S Hendryx; A D Lemly; G E Likens; O L Loucks; M E Power; P S White; P R Wilcock Journal: Science Date: 2010-01-08 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Melissa M Ahern; Michael Hendryx; Jamison Conley; Evan Fedorko; Alan Ducatman; Keith J Zullig Journal: Environ Res Date: 2011-06-22 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Gregory A Wellenius; Mary R Burger; Brent A Coull; Joel Schwartz; Helen H Suh; Petros Koutrakis; Gottfried Schlaug; Diane R Gold; Murray A Mittleman Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2012-02-13
Authors: Stephen B Williams; Yong Shan; Usama Jazzar; Preston S Kerr; Ikenna Okereke; V Suzanne Klimberg; Douglas S Tyler; Nagireddy Putluri; David S Lopez; John D Prochaska; Cornelis Elferink; Jacques G Baillargeon; Yong-Fang Kuo; Hemalkumar B Mehta Journal: JNCI Cancer Spectr Date: 2020-10-07