Literature DB >> 9744988

Effect of region of interest location on ultrasound measurements of the calcaneus.

J Damilakis1, K Perisinakis, E Vagios, D Tsinikas, N Gourtsoyiannis.   

Abstract

Ultrasound (US) measurements of the calcaneus are usually carried out in a region of interest (ROI) at a fixed site relative to a footplate. Recently, US transmission systems have been developed with imaging capability that enable selection of the position of ROI; the region of measurement is always the area of minimum attenuation in the posterior part of the calcaneus. This study compares measurements of broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and speed of sound (SOS) at the variable ROI of minimum attenuation (ROIv) and at fixed coordinates (ROIf). Ultrasound variables were estimated at ROIv and ROIf in 212 female subjects, including 26 patients with osteoporotic fractures. Among the 186 women without fractures, 63 were classified as having osteoporosis on the basis of their vertebral bone density. Precision of BUA and SOS were better at ROIv than at ROIf. BUA was more highly correlated with bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine and femoral neck at ROIv than ROIf (r = 0.64 for lumbar spine and 0.68 for femoral neck at ROIv versus 0.50 for lumbar spine and 0.54 for femoral neck at ROIf, P < 0.05 for both comparisons). There were no significant differences between the correlations of SOS with axial BMD at ROIv compared with ROIf. Significant difference was found between the areas under the ROC curve for each ultrasound variable at ROIv and ROIf for both groups of patients, subjects with osteoporosis (area under curve = 0.87 for BUA at ROIv versus 0.82 at ROIf, P < 0.05; area under curve = 0.85 for SOS at ROIv versus 0.81 at ROIf, P < 0. 05), and women with fractures (area under curve = 0.93 for BUA at ROIv versus 0.86 at ROIf, P < 0.05; area under curve = 0.91 for SOS at ROIv versus 0.82 at ROIf, P < 0.05). Ultrasound variables measured at ROIv enable improved reproducibility and significantly better differentiation of diseased subjects from healthy individuals as compared with measurements at ROIf.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9744988     DOI: 10.1007/s002239900531

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  6 in total

Review 1.  An update on the assessment of osteoporosis using radiologic techniques.

Authors:  John Damilakis; Thomas G Maris; Apostolos H Karantanas
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  A European multicenter comparison of quantitative ultrasound measurement variables: the OPUS study.

Authors:  M A Paggiosi; R Barkmann; C C Glüer; C Roux; D M Reid; D Felsenberg; M Bradburn; R Eastell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Identifying Calcaneal Anatomical Regions of Interest (ROI) for Quantitative Ultrasound Application in Subadults.

Authors:  Connor S Blythe; Mikaela S Reynolds; Laura S Gregory
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 4.000

4.  Can radial bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound measurements reduce the number of women who need axial density skeletal assessment?

Authors:  J Damilakis; G Papadokostakis; K Perisinakis; A Hadjipavlou; N Gourtsoyiannis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-07-24       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Bilateral variation in radial bone speed of sound.

Authors:  H Vrahoriti; J Damilakis; G Papadokostakis; A Hadjipavlou; N Gourtsoyiannis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11-06       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Quantitative ultrasound is better correlated with bone mineral density and biochemical bone markers in elderly women.

Authors:  Vasiliki Lappa; Ismene A Dontas; George Trovas; Evangelia Constantelou; Antonios Galanos; George P Lyritis
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 3.650

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.