Literature DB >> 9720268

Some evolutionary consequences of deleterious mutations.

B Charlesworth1, D Charlesworth.   

Abstract

Most mutations with observable phenotypic effects are deleterious. Studies of Drosophila and inbred plant populations suggest that a new individual may have a mean number of new deleterious mutations that exceeds one-half. Most of these have relatively small homozygous effects and reduce fitness by 1-2% when heterozygous. Several striking features of present-day organisms have apparently evolved in response to the constant input of deleterious alleles by recurrent mutation. For example, the adaptations of hermaphroditic organisms for outcrossing have been widely interpreted in terms of the benefits of avoiding the reduced fitness of inbred progeny, which is partly due to deleterious mutations. Population genetic models of modifiers of the breeding system in the presence of genome-wide deleterious mutation are reviewed and their predictions related to genetic and comparative data. The evolution of degenerate Y chromosomes is a phenomenon that may be caused by the accumulation of deleterious mutations. The population genetic mechanisms that can drive this degenerations are reviewed and their significance assessed in the light of available data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9720268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetica        ISSN: 0016-6707            Impact factor:   1.082


  56 in total

1.  The coevolution of cell senescence and diploid sexual reproduction in unicellular organisms.

Authors:  Y Cui; R S Chen; W H Wong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Properties of ethylmethane sulfonate-induced mutations affecting life-history traits in Caenorhabditis elegans and inferences about bivariate distributions of mutation effects.

Authors:  P D Keightley; E K Davies; A D Peters; R G Shaw
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Dominance and overdominance of mildly deleterious induced mutations for fitness traits in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  A D Peters; D L Halligan; M C Whitlock; P D Keightley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The distribution of fitness effects caused by single-nucleotide substitutions in an RNA virus.

Authors:  Rafael Sanjuán; Andrés Moya; Santiago F Elena
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-05-24       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Estimates of the genomic mutation rate for detrimental alleles in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Brian Charlesworth; Helen Borthwick; Carolina Bartolomé; Patricia Pignatelli
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Mutation accumulation in populations of varying size: the distribution of mutational effects for fitness correlates in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Suzanne Estes; Patrick C Phillips; Dee R Denver; W Kelley Thomas; Michael Lynch
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Measuring selection coefficients below 10(-3): method, questions, and prospects.

Authors:  Romain Gallet; Tim F Cooper; Santiago F Elena; Thomas Lenormand
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Do males facilitate the spread of novel phenotypes within populations of the androdioecious nematode Caenorhabditis elegans?

Authors:  Viktoria Wegewitz; Hinrich Schulenburg; Adrian Streit
Journal:  J Nematol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.402

9.  Surprising fitness consequences of GC-biased gene conversion: I. Mutation load and inbreeding depression.

Authors:  Sylvain Glémin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Direct estimate of the mutation rate and the distribution of fitness effects in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  D M Wloch; K Szafraniec; R H Borts; R Korona
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.