Literature DB >> 20421602

Surprising fitness consequences of GC-biased gene conversion: I. Mutation load and inbreeding depression.

Sylvain Glémin1.   

Abstract

GC-biased gene conversion (gBGC) is a recombination-associated process mimicking selection in favor of G and C alleles. It is increasingly recognized as a widespread force in shaping the genomic nucleotide landscape. In recombination hotspots, gBGC can lead to bursts of fixation of GC nucleotides and to accelerated nucleotide substitution rates. It was recently shown that these episodes of strong gBGC could give spurious signatures of adaptation and/or relaxed selection. There is also evidence that gBGC could drive the fixation of deleterious amino acid mutations in some primate genes. This raises the question of the potential fitness effects of gBGC. While gBGC has been metaphorically termed the "Achilles' heel" of our genome, we do not know whether interference between gBGC and selection merely has practical consequences for the analysis of sequence data or whether it has broader fundamental implications for individuals and populations. I developed a population genetics model to predict the consequences of gBGC on the mutation load and inbreeding depression. I also used estimates available for humans to quantitatively evaluate the fitness impact of gBGC. Surprising features emerged from this model: (i) Contrary to classical mutation load models, gBGC generates a fixation load independent of population size and could contribute to a significant part of the load; (ii) gBGC can maintain recessive deleterious mutations for a long time at intermediate frequency, in a similar way to overdominance, and these mutations generate high inbreeding depression, even if they are slightly deleterious; (iii) since mating systems affect both the selection efficacy and gBGC intensity, gBGC challenges classical predictions concerning the interaction between mating systems and deleterious mutations, and gBGC could constitute an additional cost of outcrossing; and (iv) if mutations are biased toward A and T alleles, very low gBGC levels can reduce the load. A robust prediction is that the gBGC level minimizing the load depends only on the mutational bias and population size. These surprising results suggest that gBGC may have nonnegligible fitness consequences and could play a significant role in the evolution of genetic systems. They also shed light on the evolution of gBGC itself.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20421602      PMCID: PMC2907210          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.110.116368

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  75 in total

1.  On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in a population.

Authors:  M KIMURA
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1962-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Evolution of the segregation ratio: modification of gene conversion and meiotic drive.

Authors:  B O Bengtsson; M K Uyenoyama
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 1.570

3.  Impact of mating systems on patterns of sequence polymorphism in flowering plants.

Authors:  Sylvain Glémin; Eric Bazin; Deborah Charlesworth
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Detrimental genes with partial selfing and effects on a neutral locus.

Authors:  T Ota; C C Cockerham
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 1.588

5.  Neutral evolution of synonymous base composition in the Brassicaceae.

Authors:  Stephen I Wright; Gabriel Iorgovan; Sushant Misra; Mohammad Mokhtari
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 6.  Biased gene conversion and the evolution of mammalian genomic landscapes.

Authors:  Laurent Duret; Nicolas Galtier
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 8.929

7.  Recombination drives the evolution of GC-content in the human genome.

Authors:  Julien Meunier; Laurent Duret
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2004-02-12       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  GC content and recombination: reassessing the causal effects for the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome.

Authors:  Marie-Claude Marsolier-Kergoat; Edouard Yeramian
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Forces shaping the fastest evolving regions in the human genome.

Authors:  Katherine S Pollard; Sofie R Salama; Bryan King; Andrew D Kern; Tim Dreszer; Sol Katzman; Adam Siepel; Jakob S Pedersen; Gill Bejerano; Robert Baertsch; Kate R Rosenbloom; Jim Kent; David Haussler
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  The impact of recombination on nucleotide substitutions in the human genome.

Authors:  Laurent Duret; Peter F Arndt
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  24 in total

1.  Surprising fitness consequences of GC-biased gene conversion. II. Heterosis.

Authors:  Sylvain Glémin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Dynamic evolution of base composition: causes and consequences in avian phylogenomics.

Authors:  Benoit Nabholz; Axel Künstner; Rui Wang; Erich D Jarvis; Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Recombination in diverse maize is stable, predictable, and associated with genetic load.

Authors:  Eli Rodgers-Melnick; Peter J Bradbury; Robert J Elshire; Jeffrey C Glaubitz; Charlotte B Acharya; Sharon E Mitchell; Chunhui Li; Yongxiang Li; Edward S Buckler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Great majority of recombination events in Arabidopsis are gene conversion events.

Authors:  Sihai Yang; Yang Yuan; Long Wang; Jing Li; Wen Wang; Haoxuan Liu; Jian-Qun Chen; Laurence D Hurst; Dacheng Tian
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Biased gene conversion skews allele frequencies in human populations, increasing the disease burden of recessive alleles.

Authors:  Joseph Lachance; Sarah A Tishkoff
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 6.  Walking through the statistical black boxes of plant breeding.

Authors:  Alencar Xavier; William M Muir; Bruce Craig; Katy Martin Rainey
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Open chromatin reveals the functional maize genome.

Authors:  Eli Rodgers-Melnick; Daniel L Vera; Hank W Bass; Edward S Buckler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Patterns and evolution of nucleotide landscapes in seed plants.

Authors:  Laurana Serres-Giardi; Khalid Belkhir; Jacques David; Sylvain Glémin
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 11.277

9.  Biased Gene Conversion Constrains Adaptation in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Tuomas Hämälä; Peter Tiffin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  The Welwitschia genome reveals a unique biology underpinning extreme longevity in deserts.

Authors:  Tao Wan; Zhiming Liu; Ilia J Leitch; Haiping Xin; Gillian Maggs-Kölling; Yanbing Gong; Zhen Li; Eugene Marais; Yiying Liao; Can Dai; Fan Liu; Qijia Wu; Chi Song; Yadong Zhou; Weichang Huang; Kai Jiang; Qi Wang; Yong Yang; Zhixiang Zhong; Ming Yang; Xue Yan; Guangwan Hu; Chen Hou; Yingjuan Su; Shixiu Feng; Ji Yang; Jijun Yan; Jinfang Chu; Fan Chen; Jinhua Ran; Xiaoquan Wang; Yves Van de Peer; Andrew R Leitch; Qingfeng Wang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.