Literature DB >> 14573472

Dominance and overdominance of mildly deleterious induced mutations for fitness traits in Caenorhabditis elegans.

A D Peters1, D L Halligan, M C Whitlock, P D Keightley.   

Abstract

We estimated the average dominance coefficient of mildly deleterious mutations (h, the proportion by which mutations in the heterozygous state reduce fitness components relative to those in the homozygous state) in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. From 56 worm lines that carry mutations induced by the point mutagen ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS), we selected 19 lines that are relatively high in fitness and estimated the viabilities, productivities, and relative fitnesses of heterozygotes and homozygotes compared to the ancestral wild type. There was very little effect of homozygous or heterozygous mutations on egg-to-adult viability. For productivity and relative fitness, we found that the average dominance coefficient, h, was approximately 0.1, suggesting that mildly deleterious mutations are on average partially recessive. These estimates were not significantly different from zero (complete recessivity) but were significantly different from 0.5 (additivity). In addition, there was a significant amount of variation in h among lines, and analysis of average dominance coefficients of individual lines suggested that several lines showed overdominance for fitness. Further investigation of two of these lines partially confirmed this finding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14573472      PMCID: PMC1462798     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  31 in total

1.  The fitness effects of spontaneous mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  L L Vassilieva; A M Hook; M Lynch
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Are induced mutations in Drosophila overdominant? I. Experimental design.

Authors:  H J MULLER; R FALK
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  A review of some fundamental concepts and problems of population genetics.

Authors:  T DOBZHANSKY
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1955

Review 4.  Mutations affecting fitness in Drosophila populations.

Authors:  M J Simmons; J F Crow
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 16.830

5.  The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. V. Coupling-repulsion effect of spontaneous mutant polygenes controlling viability.

Authors:  T Mukai; T Yamazaki
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1968-08       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. VI. Further studies on the optimum heterozygosity hypothesis.

Authors:  T Mukai
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1969-02       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Deleterious mutations as an evolutionary factor. 1. The advantage of recombination.

Authors:  A S Kondrashov
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 1.588

8.  The accumulation of deleterious genes in a population--Muller's Ratchet.

Authors:  J Haigh
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 1.570

9.  The effects of spontaneous mutation on quantitative traits. II. Dominance of mutations with effects on life-history traits.

Authors:  D Houle; K A Hughes; S Assimacopoulos; B Charlesworth
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 1.588

10.  The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. 3. Dominance effect of spontaneous mutant polygenes controlling viability in heterozygous genetic backgrounds.

Authors:  T Mukai; S Chigusa; I Yoshikawa
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1965-09       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  22 in total

1.  Influence of dominance, leptokurtosis and pleiotropy of deleterious mutations on quantitative genetic variation at mutation-selection balance.

Authors:  Xu-Sheng Zhang; Jinliang Wang; William G Hill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Analysis of the estimators of the average coefficient of dominance of deleterious mutations.

Authors:  B Fernández; A García-Dorado; A Caballero
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Gene action of new mutations in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Ruth G Shaw; Shu-Mei Chang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Selection against males in Caenorhabditis elegans under two mutational treatments.

Authors:  Diogo Manoel; Sara Carvalho; Patrick C Phillips; Henrique Teotónio
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Spontaneous mutations in diploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae: more beneficial than expected.

Authors:  Sarah B Joseph; David W Hall
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Inferences about the distribution of dominance drawn from yeast gene knockout data.

Authors:  Aneil F Agrawal; Michael C Whitlock
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The association of common polymorphisms in the QPCT gene with bone mineral density in the Chinese population.

Authors:  Qing-Yang Huang; Annie W C Kung
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-08-09       Impact factor: 3.172

8.  Fitness landscapes: an alternative theory for the dominance of mutation.

Authors:  Federico Manna; Guillaume Martin; Thomas Lenormand
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Obstruction of adaptation in diploids by recessive, strongly deleterious alleles.

Authors:  Zoe June Assaf; Dmitri A Petrov; Jamie R Blundell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Dominance genetic variance for traits under directional selection in Drosophila serrata.

Authors:  Jacqueline L Sztepanacz; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.