Literature DB >> 9719583

Can we learn to distinguish between "drug-like" and "nondrug-like" molecules?

A Ajay1, W P Walters, M A Murcko.   

Abstract

We have used a Bayesian neural network to distinguish between drugs and nondrugs. For this purpose, the CMC acts as a surrogate for drug-like molecules while the ACD is a surrogate for nondrug-like molecules. This task is performed by using two different set of 1D and 2D parameters. The 1D parameters contain information about the entire molecule like the molecular weight and the the 2D parameters contain information about specific functional groups within the molecule. Our best results predict correctly on over 90% of the compounds in the CMC while classifying about 10% of the molecules in the ACD as drug-like. Excellent generalization ability is shown by the models in that roughly 80% of the molecules in the MDDR are classified as drug-like. We propose to use the models to design combinatorial libraries. In a computer experiment on generating a drug-like library of size 100 from a set of 10 000 molecules we obtain at least a 3 or 4 order of magnitude improvement over random methods. The neighborhoods defined by our models are not similar to the ones generated by standard Tanimoto similarity calculations. Therefore, new and different information is being generated by our models, and so it can supplement standard diversity approaches to library design.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9719583     DOI: 10.1021/jm970666c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Chem        ISSN: 0022-2623            Impact factor:   7.446


  59 in total

1.  The maximal affinity of ligands.

Authors:  I D Kuntz; K Chen; K A Sharp; P A Kollman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-08-31       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Property distribution of drug-related chemical databases.

Authors:  T I Oprea
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Evaluation of designed ligands by a multiple screening method: application to glycogen phosphorylase inhibitors constructed with a variety of approaches.

Authors:  S S So; M Karplus
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  A virtual high throughput screen for high affinity cytochrome P450cam substrates. Implications for in silico prediction of drug metabolism.

Authors:  G M Keseru
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Fast estimation of hydrogen-bonding donor and acceptor propensities: a GMIPp study.

Authors:  Albert Salichs; M López; V Segarra; Modesto Orozco; F Javier Luque
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2002 Aug-Sep       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 6.  An overview of the diversity represented in commercially-available databases.

Authors:  Mary P Bradley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Filtering databases and chemical libraries.

Authors:  Paul S Charifson; W Patrick Walters
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  Reactant- and product-based approaches to the design of combinatorial libraries.

Authors:  Valerie J Gillet
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 9.  Theoretical predictions of drug absorption in drug discovery and development.

Authors:  Patric Stenberg; Christel A S Bergström; Kristina Luthman; Per Artursson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 10.  Global analysis of large-scale chemical and biological experiments.

Authors:  David E Root; Brian P Kelley; Brent R Stockwell
Journal:  Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel       Date:  2002-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.