Literature DB >> 10468550

The maximal affinity of ligands.

I D Kuntz1, K Chen, K A Sharp, P A Kollman.   

Abstract

We explore the question of what are the best ligands for macromolecular targets. A survey of experimental data on a large number of the strongest-binding ligands indicates that the free energy of binding increases with the number of nonhydrogen atoms with an initial slope of approximately -1.5 kcal/mol (1 cal = 4.18 J) per atom. For ligands that contain more than 15 nonhydrogen atoms, the free energy of binding increases very little with relative molecular mass. This nonlinearity is largely ascribed to nonthermodynamic factors. An analysis of the dominant interactions suggests that van der Waals interactions and hydrophobic effects provide a reasonable basis for understanding binding affinities across the entire set of ligands. Interesting outliers that bind unusually strongly on a per atom basis include metal ions, covalently attached ligands, and a few well known complexes such as biotin-avidin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10468550      PMCID: PMC17830          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.18.9997

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  38 in total

1.  The meaning of hydrophobicity.

Authors:  K A Dill
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-10-12       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Enzyme catalysis: not different, just better.

Authors:  J R Knowles
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-03-14       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The thermodynamics of absorption of xenon by myoglobin.

Authors:  G J Ewing; S Maestas
Journal:  J Phys Chem       Date:  1970-05-28

4.  Anti-inflammatory 17beta-thioalkyl-16alpha,17alpha-ketal and -acetal androstanes: a new class of airway selective steroids for the treatment of asthma.

Authors:  M J Ashton; C Lawrence; J A Karlsson; K A Stuttle; C G Newton; B Y Vacher; S Webber; M J Withnall
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1996-12-06       Impact factor: 7.446

5.  Comparative affinities of the epimeric reaction-intermediate analogs 2- and 4-carboxy-D-arabinitol 1,5-bisphosphate for spinach ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase.

Authors:  J V Schloss
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1988-03-25       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Protein densities.

Authors:  I D Kuntz; G M Crippen
Journal:  Int J Pept Protein Res       Date:  1979-02

7.  Reconciling the magnitude of the microscopic and macroscopic hydrophobic effects.

Authors:  K A Sharp; A Nicholls; R F Fine; B Honig
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-04-05       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Functional group contributions to drug-receptor interactions.

Authors:  P R Andrews; D J Craik; J L Martin
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 7.446

9.  Synthesis and evaluation of an inhibitor of carboxypeptidase A with a Ki value in the femtomolar range.

Authors:  A P Kaplan; P A Bartlett
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1991-08-20       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Kinetic and equilibrium characterization of vesamicol receptor-ligand complexes with picomolar dissociation constants.

Authors:  G A Rogers; W D Kornreich; K Hand; S M Parsons
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.436

View more
  178 in total

1.  Optimization of binding electrostatics: charge complementarity in the barnase-barstar protein complex.

Authors:  L P Lee; B Tidor
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Fast prediction and visualization of protein binding pockets with PASS.

Authors:  G P Brady; P F Stouten
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Filtering databases and chemical libraries.

Authors:  Paul S Charifson; W Patrick Walters
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Current trends in lead discovery: are we looking for the appropriate properties?

Authors:  Tudor I Oprea
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Hot spot analysis for driving the development of hits into leads in fragment-based drug discovery.

Authors:  David R Hall; Chi Ho Ngan; Brandon S Zerbe; Dima Kozakov; Sandor Vajda
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Protein-protein interactions: structurally conserved residues distinguish between binding sites and exposed protein surfaces.

Authors:  Buyong Ma; Tal Elkayam; Haim Wolfson; Ruth Nussinov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The consequences of translational and rotational entropy lost by small molecules on binding to proteins.

Authors:  Christopher W Murray; Marcel L Verdonk
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 8.  Filtering databases and chemical libraries.

Authors:  Paul S Charifson; W Patrick Walters
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.943

Review 9.  Current trends in lead discovery: are we looking for the appropriate properties?

Authors:  Tudor I Oprea
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.943

Review 10.  Perspectives on NMR in drug discovery: a technique comes of age.

Authors:  Maurizio Pellecchia; Ivano Bertini; David Cowburn; Claudio Dalvit; Ernest Giralt; Wolfgang Jahnke; Thomas L James; Steve W Homans; Horst Kessler; Claudio Luchinat; Bernd Meyer; Hartmut Oschkinat; Jeff Peng; Harald Schwalbe; Gregg Siegal
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 84.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.