Literature DB >> 27579988

Electrically Evoked Auditory Event-Related Responses in Patients with Auditory Brainstem Implants: Morphological Characteristics, Test-Retest Reliability, Effects of Stimulation Level, and Association with Auditory Detection.

Shuman He1, Tyler C McFayden, Holly F B Teagle, Matthew Ewend, Lillian Henderson, Craig A Buchman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to (1) characterize morphological characteristics of the electrically evoked cortical auditory event-related potentials (eERPs) and explore the potential association between onset eERP morphology and auditory versus nonauditory stimulation; (2) assess test-retest reliability of onset eERPs; (3) investigate effects of stimulation level on onset eERPs; and (4) explore the feasibility of using the onset eERP to estimate the lowest stimulation level that can be detected for individual stimulating electrodes in patients with auditory brainstem implants (ABIs).
DESIGN: Study participants included 5 children (S1 to S5) and 2 adults (S6 to S7) with unilateral Cochlear Nucleus 24M ABIs. Pediatric ABI recipients ranged in age from 2.6 to 10.2 years (mean: 5.2 years) at the time of testing. S6 and S7 were 21.2 and 24.6 years of age at the time of testing, respectively. S6 and S7 were diagnosed with neurofibromatosis II (NF2) and implanted with an ABI after a surgical removal of the tumors. All pediatric subjects received ABIs after being diagnosed with cochlear nerve deficiency. The lowest stimulation level that could be detected (behavioral T level) and the estimated maximum comfortable level (C level) was measured for individual electrodes using clinical procedures. For electrophysiological measures, the stimulus was a 100-msec biphasic pulse train that was delivered to individual electrodes in a monopolar-coupled stimulation mode at stimulation levels ranging from subthreshold to C levels. Electrophysiological recordings of the onset eERP were obtained in all subjects. For studies evaluating the test-retest reliability of the onset eERP, responses were measured using the same set of parameters in two test sessions. The time interval between test sessions ranged from 2 to 6 months. The lowest stimulation level that could evoke the onset eERP was defined as the objective T level.
RESULTS: Onset eERPs were recorded in all subjects tested in this study. Inter- and intrasubject variations in morphological characteristics of onset eERPs were observed. Onset eERPs with complex waveforms were recorded for electrodes that evoked nonauditory sensations, based on feedback from subjects, as well as for electrodes without any indications of nonauditory stimulations. Onset eERPs in patients with ABIs demonstrated good test-retest reliability. Increasing stimulation levels resulted in increased eERP amplitudes but showed inconsistent effects on response latencies in patients with ABIs. Objective and behavioral T levels were correlated.
CONCLUSIONS: eERPs could be recorded in both non-NF2 and NF2 patients with ABIs. eERPs in both ABI patient groups show inter- and intrasubject variations in morphological characteristics. However, onset eERPs measured within the same subject in this study tended to be stable across study sessions. The onset eERP can potentially be used to estimate behavioral T levels in patients with ABIs. Further studies with more adult ABI recipients are warranted to investigate whether the onset eERP can be used to identify electrodes with nonauditory stimulations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27579988      PMCID: PMC5079768          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  67 in total

1.  Evoked potential audiometry.

Authors:  T W Picton; D L Woods; J Baribeau-Braun; T M Healey
Journal:  J Otolaryngol       Date:  1976-04

2.  Optimizing the perception of soft speech and speech in noise with the Advanced Bionics cochlear implant system.

Authors:  Laura K Holden; Ruth M Reeder; Jill B Firszt; Charles C Finley
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Test-retest reliability of cortical evoked potentials using naturally produced speech sounds.

Authors:  K L Tremblay; L Friesen; B A Martin; R Wright
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Of kittens and kids: altered cortical maturation following profound deafness and cochlear implant use.

Authors:  C W Ponton; J J Eggermont
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.854

5.  Early surgical results of auditory brainstem implantation in nontumor patients.

Authors:  Jae Young Choi; Mee Hyun Song; Ju Hyun Jeon; Won-Sang Lee; Jin Woo Chang
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Cochlear implant-evoked cortical activation in children with cochlear nerve deficiency.

Authors:  Shuman He; John Grose; Anna X Hang; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Stimulation of the cochlear nucleus with multichannel auditory brainstem implants and long-term results: Freiburg patients.

Authors:  N Marangos; M Stecker; W P Sollmann; R Laszig
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol Suppl       Date:  2000

8.  Brain stem responses evoked by stimulation of the mature cochlear nucleus with an auditory brain stem implant.

Authors:  Martin O'Driscoll; Wael El-Deredy; Richard T Ramsden
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Atypical cortical responses underlie poor speech perception in children using cochlear implants.

Authors:  Karen A Gordon; Sho Tanaka; Blake C Papsin
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2005-12-19       Impact factor: 1.837

10.  Gap detection measured with electrically evoked auditory event-related potentials and speech-perception abilities in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Shuman He; John H Grose; Holly F B Teagle; Jennifer Woodard; Lisa R Park; Debora R Hatch; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  3 in total

1.  Longitudinal Changes in Electrically Evoked Auditory Event-Related Potentials in Children With Auditory Brainstem Implants: Preliminary Results Recorded Over 3 Years.

Authors:  Shuman He; Holly F B Teagle; Tyler C McFayden; Matthew Ewend; Lillian Henderson; Nancy He; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Pediatric Auditory Brainstem Implantation: Surgical, Electrophysiologic, and Behavioral Outcomes.

Authors:  Holly F B Teagle; Lillian Henderson; Shuman He; Matthew G Ewend; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  The Electrically Evoked Auditory Change Complex Evoked by Temporal Gaps Using Cochlear Implants or Auditory Brainstem Implants in Children With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency.

Authors:  Shuman He; Tyler C McFayden; Bahar S Shahsavarani; Holly F B Teagle; Matthew Ewend; Lillian Henderson; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.562

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.