Literature DB >> 19693533

Spatial Stroop and spatial orienting: the role of onset versus offset cues.

Chunming Luo1, Juan Lupiáñez, Xiaolan Fu, Xuchu Weng.   

Abstract

The present study investigated whether offset cues have the same attentional consequences in the spatial Stroop effect as onset cues. Experiments 1 and 2 compared the attentional effects of onset-offset cues versus offset cues on the spatial Stroop effect, whereas Experiment 3 compared the attentional effects of onset versus offset cues. Across these experiments, independent of cue type (onset-offset or onset vs. offset) and even at long stimulus-onset asynchrony, attentional cueing did not revert into inhibition of return and was modulated by spatial Stroop with greater cueing effects for incongruent arrow's direction and position. In addition, onset-offset or onset and offset cues produced comparable cueing effects in the location-direction congruent condition, and onset-offset or onset cues produced greater facilitation than offset cues in the incongruent condition. From a different perspective, peripheral cueing modulated the spatial Stroop effect in the same direction for onset-offset or onset and offset cues, although the reduction in spatial Stroop at cued locations was smaller with offset than with onset-offset or onset cues.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19693533     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-009-0253-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  36 in total

1.  On the strategic modulation of the time course of facilitation and inhibition of return.

Authors:  J Lupiáñez; B Milliken; C Solano; B Weaver; S P Tipper
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2001-08

2.  Inhibition of return interacts with the Simon effect: an omnibus analysis and its implications.

Authors:  Jason Ivanoff; Raymond M Klein; Juan Lupiáñez
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-02

3.  Examining the time course of facilitation and inhibition with simultaneous onset and offset cues.

Authors:  Jay Pratt; Marnie Hirshhorn
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-02-19

4.  Enhancement of the Simon effect by response precuing.

Authors:  R W Proctor; C H Lu; T Van Zandt
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1992-10

5.  Event files: feature binding in and across perception and action.

Authors:  Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Examining inhibition of return with onset and offset cues in the multiple-cuing paradigm.

Authors:  Elina Birmingham; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2004-11-24

7.  Oculomotor consequences of abrupt object onsets and offsets: onsets dominate oculomotor capture.

Authors:  Walter R Boot; Arthur F Kramer; Matthew S Peterson
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2005-07

8.  Inhibition of return and repetition priming effects in localization and discrimination tasks.

Authors:  Tracy L Taylor; Jason Ivanoff
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2005-06

9.  Does IOR occur in discrimination tasks? Yes, it does, but later.

Authors:  J Lupiáñez; E G Milán; F J Tornay; E Madrid; P Tudela
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1997-11

10.  Onset and offset of a visual cue have different effects on manual reaction time to a visual target.

Authors:  L G Gawryszewski; T G Thomaz; W Machado-Pinheiro; A N Sant'Anna
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.590

View more
  2 in total

1.  How different location modes influence responses in a Simon-like task.

Authors:  Chunming Luo; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-09-27

2.  Reduction of the spatial stroop effect by peripheral cueing as a function of the presence/absence of placeholders.

Authors:  Chunming Luo; Juan Lupiáñez; María Jesús Funes; Xiaolan Fu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.