Literature DB >> 9667699

Results of pancreatogastrostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy in 160 consecutive patients.

J M Fabre1, J P Arnaud, F Navarro, R Bergamaschi, C Cervi, E Marrel, J Domergue.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The advantages of pancreatogastrostomy over pancreatojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy are still debated. This study analyses the results of pancreatogastrostomy to identify factors that could influence immediate outcome.
METHODS: During a 10-year period, 160 consecutive patients underwent a pancreatogastrostomy. There were 109 men (68 per cent) and 51 women (32 per cent) with a mean(s.d.) age of 59(10) (range 22-82) years; 27 patients were older than 70 years. The following parameters were assessed: mortality rate, morbidity, reasons for reoperation, length of hospital stay, duration of nasogastric tube and drainage.
RESULTS: Hospital mortality rate was 3 per cent; overall morbidity rate was 30 per cent. The reoperation rate was 12 per cent, mainly because of bleeding at the pancreatic margin. Delayed gastric emptying occurred in 36 patients. The overall rate of pancreatic fistula was 2.5 per cent. Age, sex, indications for pancreatoduodenectomy, and the texture of the pancreatic remnant did not influence the occurrence of pancreatic fistula or delayed gastric emptying.
CONCLUSION: This study confirmed that pancreatogastrostomy is a safe procedure with low mortality and morbidity rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9667699     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00648.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  8 in total

1.  Reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatectomy: results of a comparative study.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Massimo Falconi; Enrico Molinari; Roberto Salvia; Giovanni Butturini; Nora Sartori; William Mantovani; Paolo Pederzoli
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Laparoscopic Intracorporeal Pancreaticogastrostomy in Total Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy-A Novel Anastomotic Technique.

Authors:  Shailesh P Puntambekar; Mehul J Mehta; Manoj M Manchekar; Mihir Chitale; Mangesh Panse; Advait Jathar; Rohan Umalkar
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-01-02

3.  Pancreatogastrostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy: a safe, feasible reconstruction method?

Authors:  Jens Standop; Marcus Overhaus; Nico Schaefer; Dorothee Decker; Martin Wolff; Andreas Hirner; Andreas Tuerler
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Open pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a pilot study.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Giovanni Butturini; Roberto Salvia; Stefano Crippa; Massimo Falconi; Paolo Pederzoli
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 5.  [Technical aspects of pancreatoenteric anastomosis].

Authors:  A M Chromik; D Sülberg; O Belyaev; W Uhl
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  A soft pancreatic remnant is associated with increased drain fluid pancreatic amylase and serum CRP levels following pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Murakami; Kenichiro Uemura; Yasuo Hayasidani; Takeshi Sudo; Yasushi Hashimoto; Naoya Nakagawa; Hiroki Ohge; Taijiro Sueda
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  A simple and safe anastomosis for pancreatogastrostomy using one binding purse-string and two transfixing mattress sutures.

Authors:  D K Bartsch; P Langer; V Kanngießer; V Fendrich; K Dietzel
Journal:  Int J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-02-27

8.  Comparison of clinical outcomes between mesh-reinforced pancreatojejunostomy and pancreatogastrostomy following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a cohort study.

Authors:  Junhai Pan; Xiaolong Ge; Wei Zhou; Xin Zhong; Lihu Gu; Hepan Zhu; Xinlong Li; Weilin Qi; Xianfa Wang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 2.754

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.