Literature DB >> 21153529

[Technical aspects of pancreatoenteric anastomosis].

A M Chromik1, D Sülberg, O Belyaev, W Uhl.   

Abstract

Advances in pancreatic surgery during the last two decades have resulted in significant improvement of patient outcome leading to mortality rates as low as 3-5% following Whipple's procedure in specialized centers. However, morbidity remains considerably high at 30-50% which is primarily caused by insufficiency of the pancreato-enteric anastomosis which becomes manifested as a pancreatic fistula. Therefore, numerous studies have aimed to identify the ideal pancreatic anastomosis. The most frequently used techniques comprise end-to-end duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy, end-to-end invagination pancreatojejunostomy as well as end-to-side pancreatogastrostomy. In randomized controlled trials the frequency of pancreatic fistulas ranges between 4% and 20% depending on the particular technique. However, no single technique was able to demonstrate a significant superiority in several independent studies. The heterogeneity of definitions for pancreatic fistula represents the main problem in evaluating and comparing clinical studies on pancreato-enteric anastomosis. However, recent clinical trials applied commonly accepted definitions for pancreatic fistula as well as precise study endpoints to address the question of the ideal pancreatic anastomosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21153529     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-010-1903-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  91 in total

1.  Does pancreatic duct stenting decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Jordan M Winter; John L Cameron; Kurtis A Campbell; David C Chang; Taylor S Riall; Richard D Schulick; Michael A Choti; JoAnn Coleman; Mary B Hodgin; Patricia K Sauter; Christopher J Sonnenday; Christopher L Wolfgang; Michael R Marohn; Charles J Yeo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies.

Authors:  John L Cameron; Taylor S Riall; JoAnn Coleman; Kenneth A Belcher
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatectomy: results of a comparative study.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Massimo Falconi; Enrico Molinari; Roberto Salvia; Giovanni Butturini; Nora Sartori; William Mantovani; Paolo Pederzoli
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Open pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a pilot study.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Giovanni Butturini; Roberto Salvia; Stefano Crippa; Massimo Falconi; Paolo Pederzoli
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Changes in morbidity after pancreatic resection: toward the end of completion pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Markus W Büchler; Markus Wagner; Bruno M Schmied; Waldemar Uhl; Helmut Friess; Kaspar Z'graggen
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2003-12

6.  Inkwell pancreaticojejunal anastomosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Addagada C Rao; Guny Gabriel; Johnny Serrano; Ramon Benedicto
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Pancreaticogastrostomy: preferred reconstruction for Whipple resection.

Authors:  D M Morris; R S Ford
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 8.  The challenge of pancreatic anastomosis.

Authors:  Axel Kleespies; Markus Albertsmeier; Firas Obeidat; Hendrik Seeliger; Karl-Walter Jauch; Christiane J Bruns
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Results of pancreatogastrostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy in 160 consecutive patients.

Authors:  J M Fabre; J P Arnaud; F Navarro; R Bergamaschi; C Cervi; E Marrel; J Domergue
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Results of resection for cancer of the exocrine pancreas: a study from the French Association of Surgery.

Authors:  H Baumel; M Huguier; J C Manderscheid; J M Fabre; S Houry; H Fagot
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  4 in total

1.  Pancreas-preserving surgical management of grade-C pancreatic fistulas after pancreatic head resection by external wirsungostomy.

Authors:  P Horvath; S Beckert; S Nadalin; A Königsrainer; I Königsrainer
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Sealing with Cyanoacrylate and a Falciform Patch Cannot Prevent Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula.

Authors:  Laura-Christin Tillmann; Torsten Herzog; Waldemar Uhl; Orlin Belyaev
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  [Evidence-based supportive measures to secure pancreatic anastomoses].

Authors:  O Belyaev; W Uhl
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  The modified Blumgart anastomosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective single center cohort study.

Authors:  Georgi Kalev; Christoph Marquardt; Herbert Matzke; Paul Matovu; Thomas Schiedeck
Journal:  Innov Surg Sci       Date:  2020-12-21
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.