Literature DB >> 15770371

Pancreatogastrostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy: a safe, feasible reconstruction method?

Jens Standop1, Marcus Overhaus, Nico Schaefer, Dorothee Decker, Martin Wolff, Andreas Hirner, Andreas Tuerler.   

Abstract

Pancreatogastrostomy is a safe reconstructive technique after pancreatoduodenectomy, even when performed as an educational operation in the hands of relatively inexperienced surgeons in a high-volume hospital. Sixteen surgeons with various case volumes operated on 190 consecutive patients and performed pancreatogastrostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy within the last 15 years in a university teaching hospital. Resections were performed for tumors localized in the head of the pancreas, the ampulla of Vater, or the distal common bile duct or duodenum (n = 169); for chronic pancreatitis (n = 16); and for miscellaneous reasons in five cases. The main outcome measures were postoperative mortality and morbidity, particularly the pancreatic leakage rate with special regard to the case volume of the performing surgeon. The overall mortality rate was 4.2% (n = 8), the 30-day mortality rate was 3.2% (n = 6), and mortality directly related to surgery was 2.6% (n = 5). Morbidity occurred in 45%, including severe surgical complications, which required reoperation (9%), and minor surgical complications that could be managed conservatively (30%). There were no significant differences in overall surgical morbidity rates when the groups with varying patient volume per surgeon were compared. The incidence of pancreatic leakage was 7.4%, which did not contribute to mortality in any case and showed no statistical differences between the surgical volume groups. We concluded that pancreatogastrostomy is safe and feasible even in the hands of inexperienced but supervised surgeons. The leakage rate is similar to the data from other high-volume centers. Once a leak is established, it can easily be managed conservatively, so it rarely contributes to severe complications or causes subsequent mortality. We recommend pancreatogastrostomy as a beneficial alternative to pancreatojejunostomy, even in the case of low surgical volume.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15770371     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-004-7741-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  66 in total

1.  Prevention of pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Ronnie Tung Ping Poon; Siu Hung Lo; Daniel Fong; Sheung Tat Fan; John Wong
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Protection of pancreatic and biliary anastomosis after partial duodenopancreatectomy by external drainage.

Authors:  H Keck; R Steffen; P Neuhaus
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1992-04

3.  Incidence, risk factors, and treatment of pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy: drainage versus resection of the pancreatic remnant.

Authors:  M I van Berge Henegouwen; L T De Wit; T M Van Gulik; H Obertop; D J Gouma
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Pancreatogastrostomy: a safe drainage procedure after pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  R Delcore; J H Thomas; G E Pierce; A S Hermreck
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 5.  Evolution and current status of the Whipple procedure: an update for gastroenterologists.

Authors:  S M Strasberg; J A Drebin; N J Soper
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 6.  An evidence-based approach to the surgical management of resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Alexander Stojadinovic; Ari Brooks; Axel Hoos; David P Jaques; Kevin C Conlon; Murray F Brennan
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Pancreaticogastrostomy: preferred reconstruction for Whipple resection.

Authors:  D M Morris; R S Ford
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 2.192

8.  Personal experience with the Whipple operation: outcomes and lessons learned.

Authors:  Verne L Hoshal; Mary B Benedict; Lisa R David; Jennifer Kulick
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 0.688

9.  Results of pancreatogastrostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy in 160 consecutive patients.

Authors:  J M Fabre; J P Arnaud; F Navarro; R Bergamaschi; C Cervi; E Marrel; J Domergue
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Pancreatic anastomotic leak after pancreaticoduodenectomy: incidence, significance, and management.

Authors:  J J Cullen; M G Sarr; D M Ilstrup
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  7 in total

1.  Our contrivances to diminish complications after pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Tatsuo Shimura; Hideki Suzuki; Kenichiro Araki; Tsutomu Kobayashi; Rei Yashima; Yasuhide Kohunato; Ryou Okada; Masahiko Shibata; Hiroyuki Kuwano; Seiichi Takenoshita
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-05

Review 2.  [Pancreaticogastrostomy: when and how?]

Authors:  D Tittelbach-Helmrich; T Keck; U F Wellner
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Obesity Does Not Influence Delayed Gastric Emptying Following Pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Jana Enderes; Christiane Pillny; Hanno Matthaei; Steffen Manekeller; Jörg C Kalff; Tim R Glowka
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-17

4.  Operative re-intervention following pancreatic head resection: indications and outcome.

Authors:  Jens Standop; Tim Glowka; Volker Schmitz; Nico Schäfer; Marcus Overhaus; Andreas Hirner; Jörg C Kalff
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Endoscopic management of anastomotic hemorrhage from pancreatogastrostomy.

Authors:  Jens Standop; Nico Schäfer; Marcus Overhaus; Volker Schmitz; Lissie Ladwein; Andreas Hirner; Jörg C Kalff
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Delayed gastric emptying following pancreatoduodenectomy with alimentary reconstruction according to Roux-en-Y or Billroth-II.

Authors:  Tim R Glowka; Markus Webler; Hanno Matthaei; Nico Schäfer; Volker Schmitz; Jörg C Kalff; Jens Standop; Steffen Manekeller
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Active smokers show ameliorated delayed gastric emptying after pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Jana Enderes; Jessica Teschke; Martin von Websky; Steffen Manekeller; Jörg C Kalff; Tim R Glowka
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2021-07-31       Impact factor: 2.102

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.