Literature DB >> 16983793

Open pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a pilot study.

Claudio Bassi1, Giovanni Butturini, Roberto Salvia, Stefano Crippa, Massimo Falconi, Paolo Pederzoli.   

Abstract

Management of the pancreatic stump following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) has always been a main source of concern among pancreatic surgeons. The present pilot study describes the reconstructive technique of anterior transgastric pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) after pylorus-preserving PD. Outcome in 50 patients with "soft" residual parenchyma treated with this technique is also reported. The average duration of the intervention was 351 minutes (range, 240-360); only two patients needed intraoperative transfusion with 2 units of blood. The postoperative period involved complications in 15 cases (30%). In particular, four patients developed pancreatic fistulas (8%), which were grade C in three cases (6%) and grade B in one patient (2%). Two patients (4%) presented with enteric fistula from erosion from a drain. Two patients experienced perianastomotic fluid collections associated with delayed gastric emptying (4%) and a clinically silent 5-cm abdominal collection was observed in an additional case. Bleeding of a gastric ulcer was treated in one case and four patients developed bronchopneumonia. None of the complications required a second surgical intervention and there were no deaths. One patient with a symptomatic fluid collection was treated by ultrasound-guided cutaneous drainage. The mean hospitalization time was 11.1 days (range, 8-25 days). The results obtained in this pilot study appear encouraging and merit further analysis in a randomized comparative trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16983793     DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2006.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  38 in total

1.  Reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatectomy: results of a comparative study.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Massimo Falconi; Enrico Molinari; Roberto Salvia; Giovanni Butturini; Nora Sartori; William Mantovani; Paolo Pederzoli
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Comparison of pancreatogastrostomy and pancreatojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy performed by one surgeon.

Authors:  S W Kim; E G Youk; Y H Park
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Upper jejunal motility after pancreatoduodenectomy according to the type of anastomosis, pancreaticojejunal or pancreaticogastric.

Authors:  I Le Blanc-Louvry; P Ducrotté; C Peillon; J Testart; P Denis; F Michot; P Tenière
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Stenting is unnecessary in duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy even in the normal pancreas.

Authors:  Toshihide Imaizumi; Nobuhiko Harada; Takashi Hatori; Akira Fukuda; Ken Takasaki
Journal:  Pancreatology       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.996

5.  Conservative management of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy with pancreaticogastrostomy.

Authors:  Nicolas Munoz-Bongrand; Alain Sauvanet; Alban Denys; Annie Sibert; Valérie Vilgrain; Jacques Belghiti
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Temporary fibrin glue occlusion of the main pancreatic duct in the prevention of intra-abdominal complications after pancreatic resection: prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Bertrand Suc; Simon Msika; Abe Fingerhut; Gilles Fourtanier; Jean-Marie Hay; Franck Holmières; Bernard Sastre; Pierre-Louis Fagniez
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Isolated Roux Loop duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy avoids pancreatic leaks in pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Abdaal W Khan; Anil K Agarwal; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.588

8.  Pancreaticojejunostomy versus controlled pancreaticocutaneous fistula in pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary carcinoma.

Authors:  P Reissman; Y Perry; A Cuenca; A Bloom; A Eid; E Shiloni; A Rivkind; A Durst
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Evaluation of the permeability of pancreaticogastric anastomoses (PGA) with dynamic magnetic resonance pancreatography after secretin stimulation (secretin MRCP).

Authors:  C Aubé; J Lebigot; P Pessaux; J J Tuech; N Kapel; P Burtin; J P Arnaud; C Caron
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug

10.  Results of pancreatogastrostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy in 160 consecutive patients.

Authors:  J M Fabre; J P Arnaud; F Navarro; R Bergamaschi; C Cervi; E Marrel; J Domergue
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Binding pancreaticoenteric anastomosis: from binding pancreaticojejunostomy to binding pancreaticogastrostomy.

Authors:  Shu You Peng; Jian Wei Wang; De Fei Hong; Ying Bin Liu; Yi Fan Wang
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2011-03-26

2.  Pancreaticojejunostomy With Externalized Stent vs Pancreaticogastrostomy With Externalized Stent for Patients With High-Risk Pancreatic Anastomosis: A Single-Center, Phase 3, Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Stefano Andrianello; Giovanni Marchegiani; Giuseppe Malleo; Gaia Masini; Alberto Balduzzi; Salvatore Paiella; Alessandro Esposito; Luca Landoni; Luca Casetti; Massimiliano Tuveri; Roberto Salvia; Claudio Bassi
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 14.766

3.  The inconsistent nature of symptomatic pancreatico-jejunostomy anastomotic strictures.

Authors:  Aram N Demirjian; Tara S Kent; Mark P Callery; Charles M Vollmer
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 4.  Reconstruction after pancreatoduodenectomy: Pancreatojejunostomy vs pancreatogastrostomy.

Authors:  Tatiana Gómez; Ana Palomares; Mario Serradilla; Luis Tejedor
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2014-09-15

5.  Delayed gastric emptying after pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy: validation of International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery classification and analysis of risk factors.

Authors:  Giuseppe Malleo; Stefano Crippa; Giovanni Butturini; Roberto Salvia; Stefano Partelli; Roberto Rossini; Matilde Bacchion; Paolo Pederzoli; Claudio Bassi
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 6.  [Technical aspects of pancreatoenteric anastomosis].

Authors:  A M Chromik; D Sülberg; O Belyaev; W Uhl
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 7.  Is antisecretory therapy after pancreatoduodenectomy necessary? Meta-analysis and contemporary practices of pancreatic surgeons.

Authors:  James R Butler; Tyrone Rogers; George Eckart; Gregory R Martens; Eugene P Ceppa; Michael G House; Attila Nakeeb; C Max Schmidt; Nicholas J Zyromski
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  An easier method for performing a pancreaticojejunostomy for the soft pancreas using a fast-absorbable suture.

Authors:  Kenichi Hakamada; Shunji Narumi; Yoshikazu Toyoki; Masaki Nara; Kenosuke Ishido; Takuya Miura; Norihito Kubo; Mutsuo Sasaki
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Amylase value in drains after pancreatic resection as predictive factor of postoperative pancreatic fistula: results of a prospective study in 137 patients.

Authors:  Enrico Molinari; Claudio Bassi; Roberto Salvia; Giovanni Butturini; Stefano Crippa; Giorgio Talamini; Massimo Falconi; Paolo Pederzoli
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Modified end-to-side double-layer open pancreaticogastrostomy after Whipple procedure: surgical tips for a safe anastomosis.

Authors:  Raffaele Dalla Valle; Matteo Rossini; Laura Lamecchi; Maurizio Iaria
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2018-01-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.