Literature DB >> 17955317

A soft pancreatic remnant is associated with increased drain fluid pancreatic amylase and serum CRP levels following pancreatoduodenectomy.

Yoshiaki Murakami1, Kenichiro Uemura, Yasuo Hayasidani, Takeshi Sudo, Yasushi Hashimoto, Naoya Nakagawa, Hiroki Ohge, Taijiro Sueda.   

Abstract

The aim of this prospective study was to clarify differences in postoperative changes of serum or drainage fluid pancreatic amylase levels and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels between patients with a soft pancreatic texture and those with a hard pancreatic texture undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) with pancreaticogastrostomy. A total of 61 consecutive patients with resectable periampullary tumors undergoing PD were recruited. This population was divided into 27 patients with a hard pancreatic texture and 34 patients with a soft pancreatic texture. Drainage fluid total amylase or pancreatic amylase levels, serum total amylase or pancreatic amylase levels, and serum CRP levels were measured postoperatively. Clinicopathological data were also compared between two groups. Postoperative complications more frequently occurred in patients with a soft pancreatic texture compared with those with a hard pancreatic texture (P=0.029). Serum or drainage fluid pancreatic amylase levels and serum CRP levels of patients with a soft pancreatic texture were significantly higher than those of patients with a hard pancreatic texture after PD on postoperative days 1 and 2 (P<0.05). A soft pancreatic texture was identified as an only independent predictive factor of increased drainage fluid pancreatic amylase levels (P=0.006) and serum CRP levels (P=0.047). A soft pancreatic texture is closely associated with increased drainage fluid pancreatic amylase and serum CRP levels after PD. More careful post-PD management is needed for patients with a soft pancreatic texture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17955317     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-007-0340-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  26 in total

1.  Serum amylase isoenzymes in patients undergoing operation for ruptured and non-ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  D J Adam; A A Milne; S M Evans; J E Roulston; A J Lee; C V Ruckley; A W Bradbury
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.268

2.  Reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatectomy: results of a comparative study.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Massimo Falconi; Enrico Molinari; Roberto Salvia; Giovanni Butturini; Nora Sartori; William Mantovani; Paolo Pederzoli
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Comparison of pancreatogastrostomy and pancreatojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy performed by one surgeon.

Authors:  S W Kim; E G Youk; Y H Park
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Hyperamylasemia and subclinical pancreatitis after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  A Ihaya; R Muraoka; Y Chiba; T Kimura; T Uesaka; K Morioka; K Matsuyama; T Tsuda; M Nara; H Niwa
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  A controlled randomized multicenter trial of pancreatogastrostomy or pancreatojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Duffas; Bertrand Suc; Simon Msika; Gilles Fourtanier; Fabrice Muscari; Jean Marie Hay; Abe Fingerhut; Bertrand Millat; Alexandre Radovanowic; Pierre-Louis Fagniez
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Hyperamylasemia after hepatic resection.

Authors:  T Tsuzuki; S Shimizu; S Takahashi; H Iio
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Modified pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  S Takao; H Shimazu; S Maenohara; H Shinchi; T Aikou
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Optimal management of the pancreatic remnant after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  S G Marcus; H Cohen; J H Ranson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Results of pancreatogastrostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy in 160 consecutive patients.

Authors:  J M Fabre; J P Arnaud; F Navarro; R Bergamaschi; C Cervi; E Marrel; J Domergue
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Pancreatic anastomotic leak after pancreaticoduodenectomy: incidence, significance, and management.

Authors:  J J Cullen; M G Sarr; D M Ilstrup
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  12 in total

1.  Drain data to predict clinically relevant pancreatic fistula.

Authors:  Daniel J Moskovic; Sally E Hodges; Meng-Fen Wu; F Charles Brunicardi; Susan G Hilsenbeck; William E Fisher
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  Drain amylase value as an early predictor of pancreatic fistula after cephalic duodenopancreatectomy.

Authors:  Vladimir D Dugalic; Djordje M Knezevic; Vladan N Obradovic; Miroslava G Gojnic-Dugalic; Slavko V Matic; Aleksandra R Pavlovic-Markovic; Predrag D Dugalic; Srbislav M Knezevic
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Randomized controlled single-center trial comparing pancreatogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after partial pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Ulrich F Wellner; Olivia Sick; Manfred Olschewski; Ulrich Adam; Ulrich T Hopt; Tobias Keck
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Usefulness of drain amylase, serum C-reactive protein levels and body temperature to predict postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Masahide Hiyoshi; Kazuo Chijiiwa; Yoshiro Fujii; Naoya Imamura; Motoaki Nagano; Jiro Ohuchida
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  A simple scoring system based on clinical factors related to pancreatic texture predicts postoperative pancreatic fistula preoperatively.

Authors:  Ulrich Friedrich Wellner; Gian Kayser; Hryhoriy Lapshyn; Olivia Sick; Frank Makowiec; Jens Höppner; Ulrich Theodor Hopt; Tobias Keck
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  Prospective randomized trial of the effect of octreotide on pancreatic juice output after pancreaticoduodenectomy in relation to histological diagnosis, duct size and leakage.

Authors:  Laureano Fernández-Cruz; Enrique Jiménez Chavarría; Pilar Taurà; Daniel Closa; Miguel-Angel López Boado; Joana Ferrer
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 3.647

7.  Predictive factors for exocrine pancreatic insufficiency after pancreatoduodenectomy with pancreaticogastrostomy.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Nakamura; Yoshiaki Murakami; Kenichiro Uemura; Yasuo Hayashidani; Takeshi Sudo; Hiroki Ohge; Taijiro Sueda
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Assessing surgical quality: comparison of general and procedure-specific morbidity estimation models for the risk adjustment of pancreaticoduodenectomy outcomes.

Authors:  C Ansorge; P Lindström; L Strömmer; J Blomberg; L Lundell; A Andrén-Sandberg; M Del Chiaro; R Segersvärd
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Hybrid laparoscopic versus open pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy: retrospective matched case comparison in 80 patients.

Authors:  Ulrich Friedrich Wellner; Simon Küsters; Olivia Sick; Caroline Busch; Dirk Bausch; Peter Bronsert; Ulrich Theodor Hopt; Konrad Wojciech Karcz; Tobias Keck
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  The Role of C-Reactive Protein in the Early Prediction of Serious Pancreatic Fistula Development after Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Fatma Umit Malya; Mustafa Hasbahceci; Yunus Tasci; Huseyin Kadioglu; Mehmet Guzel; Oguzhan Karatepe; Kemal Dolay
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2018-01-28       Impact factor: 2.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.