Literature DB >> 25144252

Binaural enhancement for bilateral cochlear implant users.

Christopher A Brown1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Bilateral cochlear implant (BCI) users receive limited binaural cues and, thus, show little improvement to speech intelligibility from spatial cues. The feasibility of a method for enhancing the binaural cues available to BCI users is investigated. This involved extending interaural differences of levels, which typically are restricted to high frequencies, into the low-frequency region.
DESIGN: Speech intelligibility was measured in BCI users listening over headphones and with direct stimulation, with a target talker presented to one side of the head in the presence of a masker talker on the other side. Spatial separation was achieved by applying either naturally occurring binaural cues or enhanced cues.
RESULTS: In this listening configuration, BCI patients showed greater speech intelligibility with the enhanced binaural cues than with naturally occurring binaural cues.
CONCLUSIONS: In some situations, it is possible for BCI users to achieve greater speech intelligibility when binaural cues are enhanced by applying interaural differences of levels in the low-frequency region.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25144252      PMCID: PMC4355942          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  13 in total

1.  Interaural time and level difference thresholds for acoustically presented signals in post-lingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants using CIS+ processing.

Authors:  D Wesley Grantham; Daniel H Ashmead; Todd A Ricketts; David S Haynes; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Perception of across-frequency interaural level differences.

Authors:  Tom Francart; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Amplification of interaural level differences improves sound localization in acoustic simulations of bimodal hearing.

Authors:  Tom Francart; Tim Van den Bogaert; Marc Moonen; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Encoding loudness by electric stimulation of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  F G Zeng; J J Galvin; C Zhang
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1998-06-01       Impact factor: 1.837

5.  Sensitivity to interaural level and envelope time differences of two bilateral cochlear implant listeners using clinical sound processors.

Authors:  Bernhard Laback; Stefan-Marcel Pok; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner; Werner A Deutsch; Karin Schmid
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Discrimination of interaural differences of level as a function of frequency.

Authors:  W A Yost; R H Dye
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Information from the voice fundamental frequency (F0) region accounts for the majority of the benefit when acoustic stimulation is added to electric stimulation.

Authors:  Ting Zhang; Michael F Dorman; Anthony J Spahr
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Performance of patients using different cochlear implant systems: effects of input dynamic range.

Authors:  Anthony J Spahr; Michael F Dorman; Louise H Loiselle
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Design and evaluation of a personal digital assistant-based research platform for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Hussnain Ali; Arthur P Lobo; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 10.  Fundamental frequency and speech intelligibility in background noise.

Authors:  Christopher A Brown; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  14 in total

1.  The Effect of Microphone Placement on Interaural Level Differences and Sound Localization Across the Horizontal Plane in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Heath G Jones; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Auditory motion tracking ability of adults with normal hearing and with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Keng Moua; Alan Kan; Heath G Jones; Sara M Misurelli; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners' Ability to Perceive Minimal Audible Angle Differences.

Authors:  Ashley Zaleski-King; Matthew J Goupell; Dragana Barac-Cikoja; Matthew Bakke
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  Cat-astrophic effects of sudden interruptions on spatial auditory attention.

Authors:  Wusheng Liang; Christopher A Brown; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 2.482

5.  Lateralization of Interaural Level Differences with Multiple Electrode Stimulation in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Olga A Stakhovskaya; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  The Effects of Dynamic-range Automatic Gain Control on Sentence Intelligibility With a Speech Masker in Simulated Cochlear Implant Listening.

Authors:  Nathaniel J Spencer; Kate Helms Tillery; Christopher A Brown
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Benefits of triple acoustic beamforming during speech-on-speech masking and sound localization for bilateral cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  David Yun; Todd R Jennings; Gerald Kidd; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 8.  Electro-Haptic Stimulation: A New Approach for Improving Cochlear-Implant Listening.

Authors:  Mark D Fletcher; Carl A Verschuur
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Sensitivity to Haptic Sound-Localization Cues at Different Body Locations.

Authors:  Mark D Fletcher; Jana Zgheib; Samuel W Perry
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Development of Sound Localization Strategies in Children with Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Yi Zheng; Shelly P Godar; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.