Literature DB >> 9659244

The inhibitory effect of phosphate on the ligase chain reaction used for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis.

T Notomi1, Y Ikeda, A Okadome, A Nagayama.   

Abstract

AIMS: To examine the detection limit of the ligase chain reaction kit for Chlamydia trachomatis, to study the inhibitory effect of phosphate on the ligase chain reaction, and to clarify the mechanism of inhibition.
METHODS: Three reference serovars of C trachomatis--D/UW-3/Cx, F/UW-6/Cx, and L2/434/Bu--were used to test the sensitivity of the chlamydia ligase chain reaction. Comparison was made of the inhibition by phosphate before and after DNA amplification. Phosphate in up to 2.4 mM concentration was added to specimens of C trachomatis serovar D (1 to 50 inclusion forming units (IFU)/reaction) before DNA amplification to examine the concentration dependency of phosphate inhibition of the ligase chain reaction.
RESULTS: The detection limits were 0.6 IFU/reaction for serovar D/UW-3/Cx and F/UW-6/Cx, and 0.4 IFU/reaction for L2/434/Bu. Phosphate inhibited the ligase chain reaction only when it was added before the amplification stage. The specimens containing chlamydia at 1 to 50 IFU/reaction were negative when the concentration of phosphate added at the prethermocycle stage was more than 1.2 mM.
CONCLUSIONS: Ligase chain reaction analysis is a reliable method of diagnosing C trachomatis infection because of its high sensitivity. It would be clearly superior to the currently used methods if the problem of inhibitors could be eliminated. The mechanism of inhibition of the ligase chain reaction by phosphate was thought to be blockade of the amplification of the target DNA. The efficacy of the ligase chain reaction could be inhibited by phosphate in the urine, so duplicate dilution analysis of some negative specimens should be useful.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9659244      PMCID: PMC500675          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.51.4.306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  17 in total

1.  Sensitivity of ligase chain reaction assay of urine from pregnant women for Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  I P Jensen; P Thorsen; B R Møller
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-02-01       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Comparison of various McCoy cell treatment procedures used for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  R T Evans; D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Ligase chain reaction to detect Chlamydia trachomatis infection of the cervix.

Authors:  J Schachter; W E Stamm; T C Quinn; W W Andrews; J D Burczak; H H Lee
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Diagnosis of male Chlamydia trachomatis urethritis by polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  H C Wiesenfeld; M Uhrin; B W Dixon; R L Sweet
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.830

5.  Amplification of Chlamydia trachomatis DNA by ligase chain reaction.

Authors:  B J Dille; C C Butzen; L G Birkenmeyer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Clinical evaluation of a new polymerase chain reaction assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens.

Authors:  C A Bass; D L Jungkind; N S Silverman; J M Bondi
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  In vitro activities of ofloxacin and four other new quinoline-carboxylic acids against Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  A Nagayama; T Nakao; H Taen
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis urethritis in men by polymerase chain reaction assay of first-catch urine.

Authors:  J E Bauwens; A M Clark; M J Loeffelholz; S A Herman; W E Stamm
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis endocervical infections by a commercial polymerase chain reaction assay.

Authors:  J E Bauwens; A M Clark; W E Stamm
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Direct detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from symptomatic and asymptomatic men by using a rapid polymerase chain reaction assay.

Authors:  G Jaschek; C A Gaydos; L E Welsh; T C Quinn
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  7 in total

1.  High analytical sensitivity and low rates of inhibition may contribute to detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in significantly more women by the APTIMA Combo 2 assay.

Authors:  Max Chernesky; Dan Jang; Kathy Luinstra; Sylvia Chong; Marek Smieja; Wenjie Cai; Beth Hayhoe; Eder Portillo; Cindy Macritchie; Cheryl Main; Ruth Ewert
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  The prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in male undergraduates: a postal survey.

Authors:  K E Rogstad; S M Bates; S Partridge; G Kudesia; R Poll; M A Osborne; S Dixon
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.519

3.  External quality assessment for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  V J Chalker; H Vaughan; P Patel; A Rossouw; H Seyedzadeh; K Gerrard; V L A James
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Reliability of nucleic acid amplification methods for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine: results of the first international collaborative quality control study among 96 laboratories.

Authors:  Roel P Verkooyen; Gerda T Noordhoek; Paul E Klapper; Jim Reid; Jurjen Schirm; Graham M Cleator; Margareta Ieven; Gunnar Hoddevik
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Vaginal swabs are appropriate specimens for diagnosis of genital tract infection with Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  Julius Schachter; William M McCormack; Max A Chernesky; David H Martin; Barbara Van Der Pol; Peter A Rice; Edward W Hook; Walter E Stamm; Thomas C Quinn; Joan M Chow
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Application of HTB-SiHa cells transfected with a recombinant plasmid for external quality assessment of Chlamydia trachomatis PCR.

Authors:  Kuo Zhang; Hong Huo; Yu Sun; Lunan Wang; Rui Zhang; Guigao Lin; Jiehong Xie; Qingtao Wang; Jinming Li
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 3.464

7.  Specimen processing and concentration of Chlamydia trachomatis added can influence false-negative rates in the LCx assay but not in the APTIMA Combo 2 assay when testing for inhibitors.

Authors:  S Chong; D Jang; X Song; J Mahony; A Petrich; P Barriga; M Chernesky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.948

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.