Literature DB >> 12904390

Vaginal swabs are appropriate specimens for diagnosis of genital tract infection with Chlamydia trachomatis.

Julius Schachter1, William M McCormack, Max A Chernesky, David H Martin, Barbara Van Der Pol, Peter A Rice, Edward W Hook, Walter E Stamm, Thomas C Quinn, Joan M Chow.   

Abstract

Because self-collected vaginal swabs (VS) are potentially very useful for screening asymptomatic women for Chlamydia trachomatis infection, a multicenter study evaluated that specimen with nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs). The objective was to determine whether VS are equal to Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-cleared specimens (cervical swabs and first-catch urines [FCU]) for diagnosing genital chlamydial infection. All NAATs then commercially available (October 1996 to October 1999) were used (ligase chain reaction [LCx Probe System; Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Ill.]; PCR [Amplicor; Roche Molecular Systems, Branchburg, N.J.]; and transcription-mediated amplification, [Amplified CT Assay; Gen-Probe Inc., San Diego, Calif.]). NAATs were performed on FCU, urethral, cervical, self- and clinician-collected VS. Sensitivity was compared to isolation using cervical and urethral swabs. Agreement of NAAT results between VS and cervical swabs or FCU was calculated. Specimens from 2,517 15- to 25-year-old asymptomatic women attending clinics at nine different centers were evaluated. Results with self- and clinician-collected VS were equivalent and were at least as good as results with FCU and cervical swabs. Across all sites, summary specificities for all specimens were >99%. Among culture-positive women, NAAT sensitivity with VS (93%) was as high as or higher than NAAT sensitivity with cervical swabs (91%) or FCU (80.6%) or culture of cervical swabs (83.5%). VS are appropriate specimens for diagnosing chlamydial genital tract infection by NAATs. That patients can efficiently collect them offers important benefits for screening programs. It would be beneficial for public health programs if the NAAT manufacturers sought FDA clearance for this specimen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12904390      PMCID: PMC179798          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.8.3784-3789.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  16 in total

1.  Noninvasive tests for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infection: application of ligase chain reaction to first-catch urine specimens of women.

Authors:  J Schachter; J Moncada; R Whidden; H Shaw; G Bolan; J D Burczak; H H Lee
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.226

2.  Evaluation of nucleic acid amplification tests as reference tests for Chlamydia trachomatis infections in asymptomatic men.

Authors:  R E Johnson; T A Green; J Schachter; R B Jones; E W Hook; C M Black; D H Martin; M E St Louis; W E Stamm
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Ligase chain reaction to detect Chlamydia trachomatis infection of the cervix.

Authors:  J Schachter; W E Stamm; T C Quinn; W W Andrews; J D Burczak; H H Lee
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis urethral infection in symptomatic and asymptomatic men by testing first-void urine in a ligase chain reaction assay.

Authors:  M A Chernesky; H Lee; J Schachter; J D Burczak; W E Stamm; W M McCormack; T C Quinn
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 5.226

5.  Diagnosis of Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections in women by using the ligase chain reaction on patient-obtained vaginal swabs.

Authors:  E W Hook; S F Ching; J Stephens; K F Hardy; K R Smith; H H Lee
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  The vaginal introitus: a novel site for Chlamydia trachomatis testing in women.

Authors:  H C Wiesenfeld; R P Heine; A Rideout; I Macio; F DiBiasi; R L Sweet
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Vulval swabs as alternative specimens for ligase chain reaction detection of genital chlamydial infection in women.

Authors:  A Stary; B Najim; H H Lee
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Is the routine pelvic examination needed with the advent of urine-based screening for sexually transmitted diseases?

Authors:  M A Shafer; R H Pantell; J Schachter
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  1999-02

9.  Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis genitourinary infection in women by ligase chain reaction assay of urine.

Authors:  H H Lee; M A Chernesky; J Schachter; J D Burczak; W W Andrews; S Muldoon; G Leckie; W E Stamm
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-01-28       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Direct detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from symptomatic and asymptomatic men by using a rapid polymerase chain reaction assay.

Authors:  G Jaschek; C A Gaydos; L E Welsh; T C Quinn
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  42 in total

1.  [Diagnosis and treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis infections].

Authors:  T Meyer
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 0.751

2.  Concomitant Chlamydia trachomatis and human papilloma virus infection cannot be attributed solely to sexual behaviour.

Authors:  V Verhoeven; M Baay; J Weyler; D Avonts; F Lardon; P Van Royen; J B Vermorken
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2004-08-18       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Pooling of clinical specimens prior to testing for Chlamydia trachomatis by PCR is accurate and cost saving.

Authors:  Marian J Currie; Michelle McNiven; Tracey Yee; Ursula Schiemer; Francis J Bowden
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Methods and recommendations for evaluating and reporting a new diagnostic test.

Authors:  A S Hess; M Shardell; J K Johnson; K A Thom; P Strassle; G Netzer; A D Harris
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 5.  Testing specimens for Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  S Skidmore; P Horner; H Mallinson
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.519

6.  Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  C Carder; D Mercey; P Benn
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.519

7.  Characteristics of the m2000 automated sample preparation and multiplex real-time PCR system for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Authors:  R Marshall; M Chernesky; D Jang; E W Hook; C P Cartwright; B Howell-Adams; S Ho; J Welk; J Lai-Zhang; J Brashear; B Diedrich; K Otis; E Webb; J Robinson; H Yu
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Use of flocked swabs and a universal transport medium to enhance molecular detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Authors:  Max Chernesky; Santina Castriciano; Dan Jang; Marek Smieja
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  The laboratory diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections.

Authors:  Max A Chernesky
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.471

10.  From the NIH: proceedings of a workshop on the importance of self-obtained vaginal specimens for detection of sexually transmitted infections.

Authors:  Marcia M Hobbs; Barbara van der Pol; Patricia Totten; Charlotte A Gaydos; Anna Wald; Terri Warren; Rachel L Winer; Robert L Cook; Carolyn D Deal; M Elizabeth Rogers; Julius Schachter; King K Holmes; David H Martin
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.830

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.