Literature DB >> 15750105

External quality assessment for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

V J Chalker1, H Vaughan, P Patel, A Rossouw, H Seyedzadeh, K Gerrard, V L A James.   

Abstract

The use of molecular methods for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis is increasing in clinical laboratories. External quality assessment enables unbiased monitoring of the performance of laboratories in the detection of specific pathogens. This study details the results of molecular and enzyme immunosorbent assay (EIA) testing for C. trachomatis detection in simulated endocervical swab specimens recently distributed internationally by United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Scheme for Microbiology (UK NEQAS for Microbiology) external quality assessment panels. The frequency of accurate detection of C. trachomatis in the panels ranged from 32 to 100%. Participants using molecular methods were significantly more likely to detect C. trachomatis in specimens than those using an EIA. Two strains were distributed with the panels: an L2 laboratory-adapted strain and an uncharacterized primary isolate. Further analysis indicated a difference in detection of C. trachomatis between specific methods only with the L2 strain at lower concentrations. In addition, eight negative specimens were distributed, and false positives were found to be rare by all methods included in the study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15750105      PMCID: PMC1081298          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.43.3.1341-1347.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  28 in total

1.  Reproducibility problems with the Abbott laboratories LCx assay for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Authors:  A M Gronowski; S Copper; D Baorto; P R Murray
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Comparison of three commercially available amplification assays, AMP CT, LCx, and COBAS AMPLICOR, for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in first-void urine.

Authors:  W H Goessens; J W Mouton; W I van der Meijden; S Deelen; T H van Rijsoort-Vos; N Lemmens-den Toom; H A Verbrugh; R P Verkooyen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Clinical features of Chlamydia trachomatis rectal infection by serovar among homosexually active men.

Authors:  J F Boisvert; L A Koutsky; R J Suchland; W E Stamm
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.830

4.  Impact of endocervical specimen quality on apparent prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infections diagnosed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method.

Authors:  J A Kellogg; J W Seiple; J L Klinedinst; J S Levisky
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 5.534

5.  Head-to-head evaluation of five chlamydia tests relative to a quality-assured culture standard.

Authors:  W J Newhall; R E Johnson; S DeLisle; D Fine; A Hadgu; B Matsuda; D Osmond; J Campbell; W E Stamm
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  False-negative results of a ligase chain reaction assay to detect Chlamydia trachomatis due to inhibitors in urine.

Authors:  E S Berg; G Anestad; H Moi; G Størvold; K Skaug
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 7.  Tests for infection with Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  Int J STD AIDS       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.359

8.  Urinary inhibitors of polymerase chain reaction and ligase chain reaction and testing of multiple specimens may contribute to lower assay sensitivities for diagnosing Chlamydia trachomatis infected women.

Authors:  M A Chernesky; D Jang; J Sellors; K Luinstra; S Chong; S Castriciano; J B Mahony
Journal:  Mol Cell Probes       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.365

9.  Urine specimens from pregnant and nonpregnant women inhibitory to amplification of Chlamydia trachomatis nucleic acid by PCR, ligase chain reaction, and transcription-mediated amplification: identification of urinary substances associated with inhibition and removal of inhibitory activity.

Authors:  J Mahony; S Chong; D Jang; K Luinstra; M Faught; D Dalby; J Sellors; M Chernesky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  The inhibitory effect of phosphate on the ligase chain reaction used for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  T Notomi; Y Ikeda; A Okadome; A Nagayama
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Testing specimens for Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  S Skidmore; P Horner; H Mallinson
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.519

2.  Clinic-based evaluation of a rapid point-of-care test for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in specimens from sex workers in Escuintla, Guatemala.

Authors:  M Sabidó; G Hernández; V González; X Vallès; A Montoliu; J Figuerola; V Isern; B Viñado; L Figueroa; J Casabona
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Quantitative real-time PCR is not more sensitive than "conventional" PCR.

Authors:  Patrick Bastien; Gary W Procop; Udo Reischl
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  The potential role of serology in diagnosing chronic lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV): a case of LGV mimicking Crohn's disease.

Authors:  B Forrester; J Pawade; P Horner
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.519

5.  Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection among low- and high-risk Filipino women and performance of Chlamydia rapid tests in resource-limited settings.

Authors:  Francis Saison; Lourdes Mahilum-Tapay; Claude-Edouard E Michel; Nigel D Buttress; Elpidio Cesar B Nadala; Jose Paolo V Magbanua; Emma M Harding-Esch; M Odeta Villaruel; Lorna Canong; Rey L Celis; Helen H Lee
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Analysis of laboratory testing results collected in an enhanced chlamydia surveillance system in Australia, 2008-2010.

Authors:  Wayne Dimech; Megan S C Lim; Caroline Van Gemert; Rebecca Guy; Douglas Boyle; Basil Donovan; Margaret Hellard
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.090

7.  Application of HTB-SiHa cells transfected with a recombinant plasmid for external quality assessment of Chlamydia trachomatis PCR.

Authors:  Kuo Zhang; Hong Huo; Yu Sun; Lunan Wang; Rui Zhang; Guigao Lin; Jiehong Xie; Qingtao Wang; Jinming Li
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 3.464

8.  Assessing proficiency of interpretation of rapid human immunodeficiency virus assays in nonlaboratory settings: ensuring quality of testing.

Authors:  Kate M Learmonth; Dale A McPhee; Darren K Jardine; Sandy K Walker; Thein-Thein Aye; Elizabeth M Dax
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 5.948

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.