Literature DB >> 9659128

Observer variation in plain radiography of the lumbosacral spine.

A Espeland1, K Korsbrekke, G Albrektsen, J L Larsen.   

Abstract

In this study, interobserver and intraobserver variations in the interpretation of plain radiographs of the lumbosacral spine were evaluated. Three radiologists independently interpreted the radiographs from 200 consecutive outpatients, aged 13-93 years, mostly referred from general practitioners. Interobserver agreement was best for vertebral fractures, osteopenia, spondylolisthesis at L5-S1, lumbosacral junctional vertebra, reduced disc height at L4-S1 and osteophytes at L2-S1 (kappa 0.61-0.95), and poorest for spina bifida of S1, degenerative spondylolisthesis and facet joint arthrosis at T12-L4, sacroiliac joint arthrosis, narrow central spinal canal, film quality, and for decisions concerning evaluation of facet joints and spinal canal (kappa < 0.34). For several diagnoses, the number of abnormal findings differed significantly between observers (p < 0.05, McNemar's test), indicating different diagnostic thresholds. Intraobserver agreement in 36 reevaluated patients was fair to excellent for almost all variables (kappa > 0.46). Although some diagnoses related to low back pain were quite consistently evaluated, the substantial disagreement on many findings should alert clinicians and radiologists against overestimating the validity and usefulness of the examinations. To improve diagnostic consistency, it is important to reduce variation caused by different thresholds for abnormality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9659128     DOI: 10.1259/bjr.71.844.9659128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  6 in total

1.  Interobserver error in interpretation of the radiographs for degeneration of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Sanjeev S Madan; Am Rai; John M Harley
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2003

2.  Influence of baseline deformity definition on subsequent vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  L J Melton; D E Wenger; E J Atkinson; S J Achenbach; T H Berquist; B L Riggs; G Jiang; R Eastell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Interobserver variability of clinical target volume delineation in supra-diaphragmatic Hodgkin's disease: a multi-institutional experience.

Authors:  Domenico Genovesi; Giampiero Ausili Cèfaro; Annamaria Vinciguerra; Antonietta Augurio; Monica Di Tommaso; Rita Marchese; Umberto Ricardi; Andrea Riccardo Filippi; Theodore Girinsky; Katiuscia Di Biagio; Maurizio Belfiglio; Enza Barbieri; Vincenzo Valentini
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  The effect of single-level, total disc arthroplasty on sagittal balance parameters: a prospective study.

Authors:  Jc Le Huec; Y Basso; H Mathews; A Mehbod; S Aunoble; T Friesem; T Zdeblick
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Definition of Normal Vertebral Morphometry Using NHANES-II Radiographs.

Authors:  John A Hipp; Trevor F Grieco; Patrick Newman; Charles A Reitman
Journal:  JBMR Plus       Date:  2022-09-27

6.  How reliable is a radiological report in osteoporosis in diagnosing low bone density?

Authors:  C D McCullagh; K McCoy; V L S Crawford; H Taggart
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  2003-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.