Literature DB >> 36248278

Definition of Normal Vertebral Morphometry Using NHANES-II Radiographs.

John A Hipp1, Trevor F Grieco1, Patrick Newman1, Charles A Reitman2.   

Abstract

A robust definition of normal vertebral morphometry is required to confidently identify abnormalities such as fractures. The Second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES-II) collected a nationwide probability sample to document the health status of the United States. Over 10,000 lateral cervical spine and 7,000 lateral lumbar spine X-rays were collected. Demographic, anthropometric, health, and medical history data were also collected. The coordinates of the vertebral body corners were obtained for each lumbar and cervical vertebra using previously validated, automated technology consisting of a pipeline of neural networks and coded logic. These landmarks were used to calculate six vertebral body morphometry metrics. Descriptive statistics were generated and used to identify and trim outliers from the data. Descriptive statistics were tabulated using the trimmed data for use in quantifying deviation from average for each metric. The dependency of these metrics on sex, age, race, nation of origin, height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) was also assessed. There was low variation in vertebral morphometry after accounting for vertebrae (eg, L1, L2), and the R 2 was high for ANOVAs. Excluding outliers, age, sex, race, nation of origin, height, weight, and BMI were statistically significant for most of the variables, though the F-statistic was very small compared to that for vertebral level. Excluding all variables except vertebra changed the ANOVA R 2 very little. Reference data were generated that could be used to produce standardized metrics in units of SD from mean. This allows for easy identification of abnormalities resulting from vertebral fractures, atypical vertebral body morphometries, and other congenital or degenerative conditions. Standardized metrics also remove the effect of vertebral level, facilitating easy interpretation and enabling data for all vertebrae to be pooled in research studies.
© 2022 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. © 2022 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CERVICAL; LUMBAR; NORMAL; VERTEBRAL MORPHOMETRY

Year:  2022        PMID: 36248278      PMCID: PMC9549721          DOI: 10.1002/jbm4.10677

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JBMR Plus        ISSN: 2473-4039


  93 in total

1.  Intervertebral motion between flexion and extension in asymptomatic individuals.

Authors:  Charles A Reitman; Kristin M Mauro; Lyndon Nguyen; James M Ziegler; John A Hipp
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Measurement of anterior vertebral compressions and biconcave vertebrae.

Authors:  L M Hurxthal
Journal:  Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med       Date:  1968-07

Review 3.  Radiographic measurement parameters in thoracolumbar fractures: a systematic review and consensus statement of the spine trauma study group.

Authors:  Ory Keynan; Charles G Fisher; Alexander Vaccaro; Michael G Fehlings; F C Oner; John Dietz; Brian Kwon; Raj Rampersaud; Christopher Bono; John France; Marcel Dvorak
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Underdiagnosis of vertebral fractures is a worldwide problem: the IMPACT study.

Authors:  Pierre D Delmas; Lex van de Langerijt; Nelson B Watts; Richard Eastell; Harry Genant; Andreas Grauer; David L Cahall
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2004-12-06       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Vertebral height restoration in osteoporotic compression fractures: kyphoplasty balloon tamp is superior to postural correction alone.

Authors:  M K Shindle; M J Gardner; J Koob; S Bukata; J A Cabin; J M Lane
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-09-16       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  A comparison of morphometric definitions of vertebral fracture.

Authors:  R Smith-Bindman; S R Cummings; P Steiger; H K Genant
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Recognition of vertebral fracture in a clinical setting.

Authors:  S H Gehlbach; C Bigelow; M Heimisdottir; S May; M Walker; J R Kirkwood
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Identification of vertebral deformities in women: comparison of radiological assessment and quantitative morphometry using morphometric radiography and morphometric X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  L Ferrar; G Jiang; N A Barrington; R Eastell
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Morphometric X-ray absorptiometry and morphometric radiography of the spine: a comparison of prevalent vertebral deformity identification.

Authors:  J A Rea; M B Chen; J Li; G M Blake; P Steiger; H K Genant; I Fogelman
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique.

Authors:  H K Genant; C Y Wu; C van Kuijk; M C Nevitt
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 6.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.