Literature DB >> 14575250

Interobserver error in interpretation of the radiographs for degeneration of the lumbar spine.

Sanjeev S Madan1, Am Rai, John M Harley.   

Abstract

We examined 114 segments in 23 patients' lumbar spine plain radiographs affected by disc degeneration. Two consultant orthopaedic surgeons, two consultant radiologists, and one spine nurse practitioner made independent observations on the radiographs. MRI scan films of the corresponding 114 segments were used as a gold standard. Kappa coefficients were used to evaluate the interobserver error, and the error between the independent observers and the MRI scanning reports. The systematic differences between the observers for the diagnosis of the disc degeneration at each segment level was recorded. There was significant interobserver error between the independent observers. The pairwise interobserver agreement ranged from fair to substantial on the plain radiograph observations [Weighted kappa coefficient, mean: 0.517 (CI=0.388-0.646)]. The pairwise interobserver agreement between the independent observers and the MRI scan ranged from fair to moderate [Weighted kappa coefficient, mean: 0.388 (CI=0.259-0.518)]. There is significant error in interpretation of the plain radiographs for the diagnosis of lumbar disc degeneration. MRI may be more accurate in the diagnosis of lumbar disc degeneration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14575250      PMCID: PMC1888399     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iowa Orthop J        ISSN: 1541-5457


  20 in total

1.  Issues in the use of kappa.

Authors:  M Ker
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 6.016

2.  Magnetic resonance study of disc degeneration in young low-back pain patients.

Authors:  H Paajanen; M Erkintalo; T Kuusela; S Dahlstrom; M Kormano
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures.

Authors:  P Brennan; A Silman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-06-06

4.  Observer variability in the interpretation of lumbar spine radiographs.

Authors:  R A Deyo; L M McNiesh; R O Cone
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1985-09

5.  Perception--a problem in the grading of sacro-iliac joint radiographs.

Authors:  N Bellamy; L Newhook; P J Rooney; P M Brooks; W P Cockshott; G T Thompson; W W Buchanan
Journal:  Scand J Rheumatol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 3.641

6.  The significance of osteophytes on lumbar vertebral bodies in relation to discographic findings.

Authors:  R C Quinnell; H R Stockdale
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 2.350

7.  Roentgenographic measurement of lumbar intervertebral disc height.

Authors:  G B Andersson; A Schultz; A Nathan; L Irstam
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1981 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Spine radiographs in patients with low-back pain. An epidemiological study in men.

Authors:  J W Frymoyer; A Newberg; M H Pope; D G Wilder; J Clements; B MacPherson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  A comparison of radiographic signs of degeneration to corresponding MRI signal intensities in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  D M Marchiori; I McLean; R Firth; R Tatum
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 1.437

10.  Observer variation in plain radiography of the lumbosacral spine.

Authors:  A Espeland; K Korsbrekke; G Albrektsen; J L Larsen
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.039

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Review of existing grading systems for cervical or lumbar disc and facet joint degeneration.

Authors:  Annette Kettler; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-09-20       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Validity and interobserver agreement of a new radiographic grading system for intervertebral disc degeneration: Part I. Lumbar spine.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Wilke; Friederike Rohlmann; Cornelia Neidlinger-Wilke; Karin Werner; Lutz Claes; Annette Kettler
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Variation in the PTH2R gene is associated with age-related degenerative changes in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Kristina Åkesson; Max Tenne; Paul Gerdhem; Holger Luthman; Fiona E McGuigan
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 4.  Computer-aided diagnosis of lumbar disc pathology from clinical lower spine MRI.

Authors:  Raja' S Alomari; Jason J Corso; Vipin Chaudhary; Gurmeet Dhillon
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Grading of degenerative disk disease and functional impairment: imaging versus patho-anatomical findings.

Authors:  Ulrich Quint; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Bone mineral density reference ranges for Australian men: Geelong Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  M J Henry; J A Pasco; S Korn; J E Gibson; M A Kotowicz; G C Nicholson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Determinants of evolution of endplate and disc degeneration in the lumbar spine: a multifactorial perspective.

Authors:  Nadja A Farshad-Amacker; Alexander P Hughes; Alexander Aichmair; Richard J Herzog; Mazda Farshad
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Ultrasound imaging measures of vertebral bony landmark distances are weakly to moderately correlated with intervertebral disc height as assessed by MRI.

Authors:  Ulrike H Mitchell; A Wayne Johnson; Lauren Adams; Tayva Sonnefeld; Patrick J Owen
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2022-03-25
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.