Literature DB >> 12868701

How reliable is a radiological report in osteoporosis in diagnosing low bone density?

C D McCullagh1, K McCoy, V L S Crawford, H Taggart.   

Abstract

Patients are often referred to osteoporosis clinics with a radiological diagnosis of osteoporosis. Previous studies attempting to ascertain risk of osteoporosis from radiographs have been conflicting. The aim of our study was to determine how reliable spinal radiographs were at detecting low bone density compared with Dual Energy X ray Absorptiometry (DXA). We retrospectively measured the Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at the spine in 130 patients with a radiological diagnosis of osteopenia or osteoporosis in the absence of vertebral fractures. They were compared with a group of 119 age and sex matched patients with one or more low trauma vertebral fractures. There was a statistically significant difference in the mean BMD between these two groups. 12.7%, of the x-ray group with osteopenia reported, had a normal bone density, 49.2% had osteopenia (T-score -1 to -2.5) and 38.1% had osteoporosis (T-score <-2.5). Of those with a radiological report of osteoporosis, 12.8% had a normal bone density, 44.7% had osteopenia and 42.6% had osteoporosis. We conclude that a radiological report of low bone density is a strong predictor of osteopenia or osteoporosis by BMD measurement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12868701      PMCID: PMC2475391     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ulster Med J        ISSN: 0041-6193


  10 in total

1.  Plain radiographs can be useful in estimating lumbar bone density.

Authors:  B A Michel; N E Lane; H H Jones; J F Fries; D A Bloch
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 4.666

2.  Review of 3,530 referrals for bone density measurements of spine and femur: evidence that radiographic osteopenia predicts low bone mass.

Authors:  A I Ahmed; D Ilic; G M Blake; J M Rymer; I Fogelman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Observer variation in the detection of osteopenia.

Authors:  D M Epstein; M K Dalinka; F S Kaplan; J M Aronchick; D L Marinelli; H L Kundel
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Accuracy of visually estimated bone mineralization in routine radiographs of the lower extremity.

Authors:  V Finsen; S Anda
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Interobserver variation in the detection of osteopenia by radiography and comparison with dual X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  M Jergas; M Uffmann; H Escher; C C Glüer; K C Young; S Grampp; O Köster; H K Genant
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  The reliability of diagnosing osteoporosis from spinal radiographs.

Authors:  A C Scane; T Masud; F J Johnson; R M Francis
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 10.668

7.  Can radiologists detect osteopenia on plain radiographs?

Authors:  M J Garton; E M Robertson; F J Gilbert; L Gomersall; D M Reid
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 2.350

8.  Clinical, biochemical, radiographic, epidemiologic, and economic features of osteoporosis.

Authors:  C C Johnston; S Epstein
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 2.472

9.  Observer variation in plain radiography of the lumbosacral spine.

Authors:  A Espeland; K Korsbrekke; G Albrektsen; J L Larsen
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Osteoporosis: diagnosis by plain chest film versus dual photon bone densitometry.

Authors:  M R Williamson; C M Boyd; S L Williamson
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.199

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.