Literature DB >> 23932272

Acoustic characterization and pharmacokinetic analyses of new nanobubble ultrasound contrast agents.

Hanping Wu1, Nicolas G Rognin, Tianyi M Krupka, Luis Solorio, Hiroki Yoshiara, Gilles Guenette, Christopher Sanders, Naohisa Kamiyama, Agata A Exner.   

Abstract

In contrast to the clinically used microbubble ultrasound contrast agents, nanoscale bubbles (or nanobubbles) may potentially extravasate into tumors that exhibit more permeable vasculature, facilitating targeted molecular imaging and drug delivery. Our group recently presented a simple strategy using the non-ionic surfactant Pluronic as a size control excipient to produce nanobubbles with a mean diameter of 200 nm that exhibited stability and echogenicity on par with microbubbles. The objective of this study was to carry out an in-depth characterization of nanobubble properties as compared with Definity microbubbles, both in vitro and in vivo. Through use of a tissue-mimicking phantom, in vitro experiments measured the echogenicity of the contrast agent solutions and the contrast agent dissolution rate over time. Nanobubbles were found to be more echogenic than Definity microbubbles at three different harmonic frequencies (8, 6.2 and 3.5 MHz). Definity microbubbles also dissolved 1.67 times faster than nanobubbles. Pharmacokinetic studies were then performed in vivo in a subcutaneous human colorectal adenocarcinoma (LS174T) in mice. The peak enhancement and decay rates of contrast agents after bolus injection in the liver, kidney and tumor were analyzed. No significant differences were observed in peak enhancement between the nanobubble and Definity groups in the three tested regions (tumor, liver and kidney). However, the decay rates of nanobubbles in tumor and kidney were significantly slower than those of Definity in the first 200-s fast initial phase. There were no significant differences in the decay rates in the liver in the initial phase or in three regions of interest in the terminal phase. Our results suggest that the stability and acoustic properties of the new nanobubble contrast agents are superior to those of the clinically used Definity microbubbles. The slower washout of nanobubbles in tumors suggests potential entrapment of the bubbles within the tumor parenchyma.
Copyright © 2013 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Nanobubble; Pharmacokinetic study; Ultrasound contrast agents

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23932272      PMCID: PMC3786045          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  33 in total

1.  Angiogenesis imaging by spatiotemporal analysis of ultrasound contrast agent dispersion kinetics.

Authors:  Massimo Mischi; Maarten P J Kuenen; Hessel Wijkstra
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  ABA and BAB type triblock copolymers of PEG and PLA: a comparative study of drug release properties and "stealth" particle characteristics.

Authors:  Guosen He; Lwin Lwin Ma; Jie Pan; Subbu Venkatraman
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2006-10-21       Impact factor: 5.875

3.  On the effect of lung filtering and cardiac pressure on the standard properties of ultrasound contrast agent.

Authors:  A Bouakaz; N de Jong; C Cachard; K Jouini
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.890

Review 4.  Contrast echocardiography in critical care: echoes of the future? A review of the role of microsphere contrast echocardiography.

Authors:  David G Platts; John F Fraser
Journal:  Crit Care Resusc       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.159

5.  The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Practice of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS): update 2011 on non-hepatic applications.

Authors:  F Piscaglia; C Nolsøe; C F Dietrich; D O Cosgrove; O H Gilja; M Bachmann Nielsen; T Albrecht; L Barozzi; M Bertolotto; O Catalano; M Claudon; D A Clevert; J M Correas; M D'Onofrio; F M Drudi; J Eyding; M Giovannini; M Hocke; A Ignee; E M Jung; A S Klauser; N Lassau; E Leen; G Mathis; A Saftoiu; G Seidel; P S Sidhu; G ter Haar; D Timmerman; H P Weskott
Journal:  Ultraschall Med       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 6.548

6.  Pulmonary capillary diameters and recruitment characteristics in subpleural and interior networks.

Authors:  A C Short; M L Montoya; S A Gebb; R G Presson; W W Wagner; R L Capen
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1996-05

7.  Hepatic tumor detection: MR imaging and conventional US versus pulse-inversion harmonic US of NC100100 during its reticuloendothelial system-specific phase.

Authors:  Flemming Forsberg; Catherine W Piccoli; Ji-Bin Liu; Nandkumar M Rawool; Daniel A Merton; Donald G Mitchell; Barry B Goldberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Quantification of perfusion of liver tissue and metastases using a multivessel model for replenishment kinetics of ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Martin Krix; Christian Plathow; Fabian Kiessling; Felix Herth; Andreas Karcher; Marco Essig; Harry Schmitteckert; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Stefan Delorme
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Ultrasound molecular imaging of VEGFR2 in a rat prostate tumor model using BR55.

Authors:  Isabelle Tardy; Sibylle Pochon; Martine Theraulaz; Patricia Emmel; Lisa Passantino; François Tranquart; Michel Schneider
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.016

10.  Lipid corralling and poloxamer squeeze-out in membranes.

Authors:  Guohui Wu; Jaroslaw Majewski; Canay Ege; Kristian Kjaer; Markus Jan Weygand; Ka Yee C Lee
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2004-07-07       Impact factor: 9.161

View more
  34 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasound imaging beyond the vasculature with new generation contrast agents.

Authors:  Reshani H Perera; Christopher Hernandez; Haoyan Zhou; Pavan Kota; Alan Burke; Agata A Exner
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2015-01-08

2.  Real time ultrasound molecular imaging of prostate cancer with PSMA-targeted nanobubbles.

Authors:  Reshani H Perera; Al de Leon; Xinning Wang; Yu Wang; Gopal Ramamurthy; Pubudu Peiris; Eric Abenojar; James P Basilion; Agata A Exner
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2020-04-26       Impact factor: 5.307

3.  Polypyrrole-Coated Perfluorocarbon Nanoemulsions as a Sono-Photoacoustic Contrast Agent.

Authors:  David S Li; Soon Joon Yoon; Ivan Pelivanov; Martin Frenz; Matthew O'Donnell; Lilo D Pozzo
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 11.189

4.  Spontaneous Nucleation of Stable Perfluorocarbon Emulsions for Ultrasound Contrast Agents.

Authors:  David S Li; Sarah Schneewind; Matthew Bruce; Zin Khaing; Matthew O'Donnell; Lilo Pozzo
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 11.189

5.  Enhancing Tumor Drug Distribution With Ultrasound-Triggered Nanobubbles.

Authors:  Pinunta Nittayacharn; Hai-Xia Yuan; Christopher Hernandez; Peter Bielecki; Haoyan Zhou; Agata A Exner
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 3.534

Review 6.  Ultrasound in Radiology: From Anatomic, Functional, Molecular Imaging to Drug Delivery and Image-Guided Therapy.

Authors:  Alexander L Klibanov; John A Hossack
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 6.016

7.  Time-intensity-curve Analysis and Tumor Extravasation of Nanobubble Ultrasound Contrast Agents.

Authors:  Hanping Wu; Eric C Abenojar; Reshani Perera; Al Christopher De Leon; Tianzhi An; Agata A Exner
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Improving performance of nanoscale ultrasound contrast agents using N,N-diethylacrylamide stabilization.

Authors:  Reshani H Perera; Hanping Wu; Pubudu Peiris; Christopher Hernandez; Alan Burke; Helen Zhang; Agata A Exner
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 5.307

9.  Nanobubble ultrasound contrast agents for enhanced delivery of thermal sensitizer to tumors undergoing radiofrequency ablation.

Authors:  Reshani H Perera; Luis Solorio; Hanping Wu; Mihika Gangolli; Eric Silverman; Christopher Hernandez; Pubudu M Peiris; Ann-Marie Broome; Agata A Exner
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 4.200

10.  Pickering Bubbles as Dual-Modality Ultrasound and Photoacoustic Contrast Agents.

Authors:  Al de Leon; Peiran Wei; Filip Bordera; Dana Wegierak; Madelyn McMillen; David Yan; Christina Hemmingsen; Michael C Kolios; Emily B Pentzer; Agata A Exner
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 9.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.