Literature DB >> 20447755

Effect of microbubble size on fundamental mode high frequency ultrasound imaging in mice.

Shashank Sirsi1, Jameel Feshitan, James Kwan, Shunichi Homma, Mark Borden.   

Abstract

High-frequency ultrasound imaging using microbubble (MB) contrast agents is becoming increasingly popular in pre-clinical and small animal studies of anatomy, flow and vascular expression of molecular epitopes. Currently, in vivo imaging studies rely on highly polydisperse microbubble suspensions, which may provide a complex and varied acoustic response. To study the effect of individual microbubble size populations, microbubbles of 1-2 microm, 4-5 microm and 6-8 microm diameter were isolated using the technique of differential centrifugation. Size-selected microbubbles were imaged in the mouse kidney over a range of concentrations using a Visualsonics Vevo 770 ultrasound imaging system (Visualsonics, Toronto, Ontario, Canada) with a 40-MHz probe in fundamental mode. Results demonstrate that contrast enhancement and circulation persistence are strongly dependent on microbubble size and concentration. Large microbubbles (4-5 and 6-8 microm) strongly enhanced the ultrasound image with positive contrast, while 1-2 microm microbubbles showed little enhancement. For example, the total integrated contrast enhancement, measured by the area under the time-intensity curve (AUC), increased 16-fold for 6-8 microm diameter microbubbles at 5 x 10(7) MB/bolus compared with 4-5 microm microbubbles at the same concentration. Interestingly, 1-2 microm diameter microbubbles, at any concentration, did not measurably enhance the integrated ultrasound signal at tissue depth, but did noticeably attenuate the signal, indicating that they had a low scattering-to-attenuation ratio. When concentration matched, larger microbubbles were more persistent in circulation. However, when volume matched, all microbubble sizes had a similar circulation half-life. These results indicated that dissolution of the gas core plays a larger role in contrast elimination than filtering by the lungs and spleen. The results of this study show that microbubbles can be tailored for optimal contrast enhancement in fundamental mode imaging. Copyright 2010 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20447755      PMCID: PMC2878876          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.03.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  36 in total

1.  Fundamental studies on contrast images from different-sized microbubbles: analytical and experimental studies.

Authors:  K Soetanto; M Chan
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 2.  Advances in ultrasound biomicroscopy.

Authors:  F S Foster; C J Pavlin; K A Harasiewicz; D A Christopher; D H Turnbull
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 3.  Targeted imaging using ultrasound.

Authors:  Paul A Dayton; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Absorption and scatter of encapsulated gas filled microspheres: theoretical considerations and some measurements.

Authors:  N de Jong; L Hoff; T Skotland; N Bom
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.890

5.  A new 15-50 MHz array-based micro-ultrasound scanner for preclinical imaging.

Authors:  F Stuart Foster; James Mehi; Marc Lukacs; Desmond Hirson; Chris White; Chris Chaggares; Andrew Needles
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  On the effect of lung filtering and cardiac pressure on the standard properties of ultrasound contrast agent.

Authors:  A Bouakaz; N de Jong; C Cachard; K Jouini
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.890

7.  Pulmonary capillary diameters and recruitment characteristics in subpleural and interior networks.

Authors:  A C Short; M L Montoya; S A Gebb; R G Presson; W W Wagner; R L Capen
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1996-05

8.  A new ultrasound instrument for in vivo microimaging of mice.

Authors:  F S Foster; M Y Zhang; Y Q Zhou; G Liu; J Mehi; E Cherin; K A Harasiewicz; B G Starkoski; L Zan; D A Knapik; S L Adamson
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Acoustic and kinetic behaviour of definity in mice exposed to high frequency ultrasound.

Authors:  Shawn Stapleton; Heather Goodman; Yu-Qing Zhou; Emmanuel Cherin; R Mark Henkelman; Peter N Burns; F Stuart Foster
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic evaluation of inflammatory activity in Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Vincenzo Migaleddu; Antonio M Scanu; Emilio Quaia; Paolo Cossu Rocca; Maria Pina Dore; Domenico Scanu; Lorenza Azzali; Giuseppe Virgilio
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  54 in total

1.  Polyplex-microbubble hybrids for ultrasound-guided plasmid DNA delivery to solid tumors.

Authors:  Shashank R Sirsi; Sonia L Hernandez; Lukasz Zielinski; Henning Blomback; Adel Koubaa; Milo Synder; Shunichi Homma; Jessica J Kandel; Darrell J Yamashiro; Mark A Borden
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 9.776

2.  Effect of surface architecture on in vivo ultrasound contrast persistence of targeted size-selected microbubbles.

Authors:  Cherry C Chen; Shashank R Sirsi; Shunichi Homma; Mark A Borden
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 3.  In vitro methods to study bubble-cell interactions: Fundamentals and therapeutic applications.

Authors:  Guillaume Lajoinie; Ine De Cock; Constantin C Coussios; Ine Lentacker; Séverine Le Gac; Eleanor Stride; Michel Versluis
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 4.  Reverse engineering the ultrasound contrast agent.

Authors:  Mark A Borden; Kang-Ho Song
Journal:  Adv Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 12.984

5.  Theranostic Multilayer Capsules for Ultrasound Imaging and Guided Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Jun Chen; Sithira Ratnayaka; Aaron Alford; Veronika Kozlovskaya; Fei Liu; Bing Xue; Kenneth Hoyt; Eugenia Kharlampieva
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 15.881

6.  Assessment of the Superharmonic Response of Microbubble Contrast Agents for Acoustic Angiography as a Function of Microbubble Parameters.

Authors:  Isabel G Newsome; Thomas M Kierski; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Optimizing Sensitivity of Ultrasound Contrast-Enhanced Super-Resolution Imaging by Tailoring Size Distribution of Microbubble Contrast Agent.

Authors:  Fanglue Lin; James K Tsuruta; Juan D Rojas; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Contrast ultrasound imaging for identification of early responder tumor models to anti-angiogenic therapy.

Authors:  Shashank R Sirsi; Molly L Flexman; Fotois Vlachos; Jianzhong Huang; Sonia L Hernandez; Hyun Keol Kim; Tessa B Johung; Jeffrey W Gander; Ari R Reichstein; Brooke S Lampl; Antai Wang; Andreas H Hielscher; Jessica J Kandel; Darrell J Yamashiro; Mark A Borden
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Markedly enhanced skeletal muscle transfection achieved by the ultrasound-targeted delivery of non-viral gene nanocarriers with microbubbles.

Authors:  Caitlin W Burke; Jung Soo Suk; Anthony J Kim; Yu-Han J Hsiang; Alexander L Klibanov; Justin Hanes; Richard J Price
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 9.776

10.  Effects of high-fat diet and losartan on renal cortical blood flow using contrast ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Anne-Emilie Declèves; Joshua J Rychak; Dan J Smith; Kumar Sharma
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2013-09-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.