Literature DB >> 9650961

Direct susceptibility testing with positive BacT/Alert blood cultures by using MicroScan overnight and rapid panels.

K B Waites1, E S Brookings, S A Moser, B L Zimmer.   

Abstract

Studies were conducted on a method of direct inoculation of MicroScan dried overnight and of rapid panels with positive aerobic blood cultures obtained from the BacT/Alert to determine antimicrobial susceptibilities. Inocula were limited to specimens that appeared unimicrobic on Gram stain. Results were compared to those obtained from panels inoculated following subculture. For 133 gram-negative bacilli, there were 94.7 and 93.5% categorical agreements between direct and standard methods for all drugs tested with overnight and rapid panels, respectively. For 104 gram-positive cocci, there were 93.2 and 93.1% categorical agreements for overnight and rapid panels, respectively. The major error (false resistance) rate for gram negatives was 1.4% for overnight versus 0.7% for rapid panels. The very major error (false susceptibility) rate was 2.7% for overnight versus 8.1% for rapid panels. The total error rates were 1.6% for overnight panels and 1.5% for rapid panels. The major error rates for gram-positive direct susceptibility tests were 2.6% for overnight and 2.5% for rapid panels. The very major error rates were 8.8 and 7.2% for overnight and rapid panels, respectively. Total error rates were 3.6% for overnight and rapid gram-positive panels. These findings suggest that susceptibility results obtained from directly inoculated gram-negative overnight panels have the greatest correlation to those obtained by standard methods. When discrepant results occur with direct-susceptibility testing, they are more likely to show false susceptibility than false resistance.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9650961      PMCID: PMC104977     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  12 in total

1.  Standardization of direct susceptibility test for blood cultures.

Authors:  D Fay; J E Oldfather
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Evaluation of the autoSCAN-W/A rapid system for identification and susceptibility testing of gram-negative fermentative bacilli.

Authors:  M K York; G F Brooks; E H Fiss
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Rapid, direct antibiotic susceptibility testing of blood culture isolates using the Abbott Avantage system.

Authors:  F S Nolte; P B Contestable; D Lincalis; A Punsalang
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 2.493

4.  Comparison of direct and standard antimicrobial disk susceptibility testing for bacteria isolated from blood.

Authors:  S Mirrett; L B Reller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Automated blood culture systems.

Authors:  M L Wilson; M P Weinstein; L B Reller
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 1.935

Review 6.  Antimicrobial susceptibility testing and blood cultures.

Authors:  S Mirrett
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 1.935

7.  Comparison of direct and standard microtiter broth dilution susceptibility testing of blood culture isolates.

Authors:  T E Kiehn; C Capitolo; D Armstrong
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Rapid identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli from blood cultures by the AutoMicrobic system.

Authors:  D F Moore; S S Hamada; E Marso; W J Martin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Clinical impact of rapid identification and susceptibility testing of bacterial blood culture isolates.

Authors:  G M Trenholme; R L Kaplan; P H Karakusis; T Stine; J Fuhrer; W Landau; S Levin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Clinical impact of rapid in vitro susceptibility testing and bacterial identification.

Authors:  G V Doern; R Vautour; M Gaudet; B Levy
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  21 in total

1.  Direct susceptibility testing of positive blood cultures by using Sensititre broth microdilution plates.

Authors:  Kimberle C Chapin; Michael C Musgnug
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Use of positive blood cultures for direct identification and susceptibility testing with the vitek 2 system.

Authors:  Marina de Cueto; Esther Ceballos; Luis Martinez-Martinez; Evelio J Perea; Alvaro Pascual
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Use of the BD PHOENIX Automated Microbiology System for direct identification and susceptibility testing of gram-negative rods from positive blood cultures in a three-phase trial.

Authors:  Guido Funke; Pascale Funke-Kissling
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Accuracy of identification and susceptibility results by direct inoculation of Vitek 2 cards from positive BACTEC cultures.

Authors:  J J Kerremans; W H F Goessens; H A Verbrugh; M C Vos
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Evaluation of the Merlin MICRONAUT system for rapid direct susceptibility testing of gram-positive cocci and gram-negative bacilli from positive blood cultures.

Authors:  Nele Wellinghausen; Tim Pietzcker; Sven Poppert; Syron Belak; Nicole Fieser; Melanie Bartel; Andreas Essig
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  Antimicrobial Stewardship: How the Microbiology Laboratory Can Right the Ship.

Authors:  Philippe Morency-Potvin; David N Schwartz; Robert A Weinstein
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 26.132

7.  Current state of the art in rapid diagnostics for antimicrobial resistance.

Authors:  Rathina Kumar Shanmugakani; Balaji Srinivasan; Marshall J Glesby; Lars F Westblade; Washington B Cárdenas; Tony Raj; David Erickson; Saurabh Mehta
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 6.799

8.  Direct-from-Blood-Culture Disk Diffusion To Determine Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Gram-Negative Bacteria: Preliminary Report from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Methods Development and Standardization Working Group.

Authors:  Sukantha Chandrasekaran; April Abbott; Shelley Campeau; Barbara L Zimmer; Melvin Weinstein; Lauri Thrupp; John Hejna; Lindsey Walker; Tracy Ammann; Thomas Kirn; Robin Patel; Romney M Humphries
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Rapid identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Gram-negative rod on positive blood cultures using MicroScan panels.

Authors:  A Infante; V Ortiz de la Tabla; C Martín; G Gázquez; F Buñuel
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  Rapid identification and antimicrobial susceptibility profiling of Gram-positive cocci in blood cultures with the Vitek 2 system.

Authors:  A Lupetti; S Barnini; B Castagna; A-L Capria; P H Nibbering
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 3.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.