Literature DB >> 29305540

Direct-from-Blood-Culture Disk Diffusion To Determine Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Gram-Negative Bacteria: Preliminary Report from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Methods Development and Standardization Working Group.

Sukantha Chandrasekaran1, April Abbott2, Shelley Campeau1, Barbara L Zimmer3, Melvin Weinstein4,5, Lauri Thrupp6, John Hejna7, Lindsey Walker3,7, Tracy Ammann7, Thomas Kirn4,5, Robin Patel8, Romney M Humphries9,7.   

Abstract

The performance of a disk diffusion test using broth from positive blood cultures as inoculum (direct disk diffusion [dDD]) was evaluated for a collection of 20 challenge isolates of Enterobacteriaceae, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates seeded into human blood were inoculated into Bactec Plus Aerobic/F, VersaTREK Redox 1, and BacT/Alert FA Plus bottles and incubated in the respective automated blood culture systems. Disk diffusion results were compared to reference disk diffusion results. Categorical agreement (CA) values for dDD, after removal of random errors due to natural MIC variation, were 87.8%, 88.4%, and 92.2% for the BacT/Alert, Bactec, and VersaTREK systems, respectively. No very major errors (VME) were observed, and major error (ME) rates were 3.0%, 2.3%, and 1.7%, respectively. Incubation of the dDD test samples for 6 h compared to incubation for 16 to 18 h resulted in 19.9% of tests having too light of growth to allow reading of zones of inhibition. Among the evaluable dDD tests, CA values were 58.9%, 76.6%, and 73.2% for the isolates seeded into the BacT/Alert, Bactec, and VersaTREK systems, respectively. VME rates for isolates seeded into these systems were 2.2%, 1.8%, and 3.0%, respectively, and ME rates were 25.4%, 6.1%, and 2.8%, respectively, at the 6-h reading. The best performance of dDD was found for blood cultures with bacterial concentrations in the range of 7.6 × 107 to 5.0 × 108 CFU/ml; CA values ranged from 94.7 to 96.2% for these concentrations after 18 h of incubation and from 76.9 to 84.1% after 6 h of incubation. These preliminary data demonstrate the potential accuracy of dDD testing by the clinical laboratory.
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gram-negative bacteria; blood culture; susceptibility testing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29305540      PMCID: PMC5824059          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01678-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  18 in total

1.  Direct susceptibility testing of positive blood cultures by using Sensititre broth microdilution plates.

Authors:  Kimberle C Chapin; Michael C Musgnug
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Use of positive blood cultures for direct identification and susceptibility testing with the vitek 2 system.

Authors:  Marina de Cueto; Esther Ceballos; Luis Martinez-Martinez; Evelio J Perea; Alvaro Pascual
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Use of the BD PHOENIX Automated Microbiology System for direct identification and susceptibility testing of gram-negative rods from positive blood cultures in a three-phase trial.

Authors:  Guido Funke; Pascale Funke-Kissling
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Strategy for rapid identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacteria directly recovered from positive blood cultures using the Bruker MALDI Biotyper and the BD Phoenix system.

Authors:  Jana L Wimmer; S Wesley Long; Patricia Cernoch; Geoffrey A Land; James R Davis; James M Musser; Randall J Olsen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Reply to Idelevich and Beck.

Authors:  Ritu Banerjee; Christine B Teng; Scott A Cunningham; Sherry Ihde; James P Steckelberg; James P Moriarty; Nilay D Shah; Jay Mandrekar; Robin Patel
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Direct method to determine the antibiotic susceptibility of rapidly growing blood pathogens.

Authors:  D L Wegner; C R Mathis; T R Neblett
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  Clinical laboratory detection of carbapenem-resistant and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Shelley Miller; Romney M Humphries
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 5.091

8.  Comparison of direct and standard antimicrobial disk susceptibility testing for bacteria isolated from blood.

Authors:  S Mirrett; L B Reller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Detection Practices in California: What Are We Missing?

Authors:  Romney M Humphries; Janet A Hindler; Erin Epson; Sam Horwich-Scholefield; Loren G Miller; Job Mendez; Jeremias B Martinez; Jacob Sinkowitz; Darren Sinkowtiz; Christina Hershey; Patricia Marquez; Sandeep Bhaurla; Marcelo Moran; Lindsey Pandes; Dawn Terashita; James A McKinnell
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 9.079

10.  Performance of Vitek 2 for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Enterobacteriaceae with Vitek 2 (2009 FDA) and 2014 CLSI breakpoints.

Authors:  April M Bobenchik; Eszter Deak; Janet A Hindler; Carmen L Charlton; Romney M Humphries
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  28 in total

1.  Blood Culture Results Reporting: How Fast Is Your Laboratory and Is Faster Better?

Authors:  Richard B Thomson; Erin McElvania
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Rapid Direct Susceptibility Testing from Positive Blood Cultures by the Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry-Based Direct-on-Target Microdroplet Growth Assay.

Authors:  Evgeny A Idelevich; Luise M Storck; Katrin Sparbier; Oliver Drews; Markus Kostrzewa; Karsten Becker
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing from the blood culture pellet obtained for MALDI-TOF identification of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  J M López-Pintor; C Navarro-San Francisco; J Sánchez-López; A García-Caballero; E Loza Fernández de Bobadilla; M I Morosini; R Cantón
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 4.  The Continued Value of Disk Diffusion for Assessing Antimicrobial Susceptibility in Clinical Laboratories: Report from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Methods Development and Standardization Working Group.

Authors:  Romney M Humphries; Susan Kircher; Andrea Ferrell; Kevin M Krause; Rianna Malherbe; Andre Hsiung; C A Burnham
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Evaluation of Bio-Rad® discs for antimicrobial susceptibility testing by disc diffusion and the ADAGIO™ system for the automatic reading and interpretation of results.

Authors:  Merav Strauss; Kariman Zoabi; Dana Sagas; Bela Reznik-Gitlitz; Raul Colodner
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Impact of Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing in Gram-Negative Rod Bacteremia: a Quasi-experimental Study.

Authors:  Catherine Anne Hogan; Bertrand Ebunji; Nancy Watz; Kristopher Kapphahn; Joseph Rigdon; Emily Mui; Lina Meng; William Alegria; Marisa Holubar; Stanley Deresinski; Niaz Banaei
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  Rapid Susceptibility Testing Methods.

Authors:  Kenneth P Smith; James E Kirby
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 1.935

8.  Biographical Feature: Robin Patel, M.D.(C.M.), D(ABMM), F(AAM), FIDSA, FACP.

Authors:  Erik Munson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Assessment of rapid direct E-test on positive blood culture for same-day antimicrobial susceptibility.

Authors:  Gabriele Bianco; Marco Iannaccone; Matteo Boattini; Rossana Cavallo; Cristina Costa
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 2.476

10.  Evaluation of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Guidelines for Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Bacillus anthracis-, Yersinia pestis- and Francisella tularensis-Positive Blood Cultures.

Authors:  Ohad Shifman; Tamar Aminov; Moshe Aftalion; David Gur; Hila Cohen; Elad Bar-David; Ofer Cohen; Emanuelle Mamroud; Haim Levy; Ronit Aloni-Grinstein; Ida Steinberger-Levy; Shahar Rotem
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-05-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.