Literature DB >> 7107862

Comparison of direct and standard microtiter broth dilution susceptibility testing of blood culture isolates.

T E Kiehn, C Capitolo, D Armstrong.   

Abstract

Turbid broth (0.5 ml) from blood culture bottles was inoculated into 0.5 ml of brain heart infusion broth, incubated for 3 to 6 h, diluted 1:500 in distilled water, and then inoculated directly into microtiter broth dilution susceptibility trays to test for minimal inhibitory concentrations. The results were compared to the standard tests performed 24 h later on colonies from subculture plates. The minimal inhibitory concentrations measured by these two methods were compared in 1,875 organism-antibiotic tests. The two minimal inhibitory concentrations were identical in 86.0% and within one twofold dilution in 98.0% of the tests. An organism was judged to be susceptible by one method and resistant by the other in 13 tests (0.7%). These 13 discrepancies were distributed among several organism-antibiotic combinations; no more than two were seen for any one combination. Highly accurate susceptibility testing can be achieved by using direct inoculation of turbid blood culture broths.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7107862      PMCID: PMC272301          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.16.1.96-98.1982

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  8 in total

1.  Standardization of direct susceptibility test for blood cultures.

Authors:  D Fay; J E Oldfather
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Unreliability of direct antibiotic susceptibility testing on wound exudates.

Authors:  P D Ellner; E Johnson
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1976-02       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Comparison of direct and standardized antimicrobial susceptibility testing of positive blood cultures.

Authors:  J E Johnson; J A Washington
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Comparison of direct and standardized disk diffusion susceptibility testing of urine cultures.

Authors:  G E Hollick; J A Washington
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Direct method to determine the antibiotic susceptibility of rapidly growing blood pathogens.

Authors:  D L Wegner; C R Mathis; T R Neblett
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Effect of mixed cultures on antibiotic susceptibility testing.

Authors:  A Shahidi; P D Ellner
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1969-11

7.  Comparison of direct and standard antimicrobial disk susceptibility testing for bacteria isolated from blood.

Authors:  S Mirrett; L B Reller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  An improved single-disk method for testing the antibiotic susceptibility of rapidly-growing pathogens.

Authors:  A L Barry; F Garcia; L D Thrupp
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1970-02       Impact factor: 2.493

  8 in total
  10 in total

1.  Direct susceptibility testing of positive blood cultures by using Sensititre broth microdilution plates.

Authors:  Kimberle C Chapin; Michael C Musgnug
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli in blood cultures by an electrochemical method.

Authors:  A H Huang; J J Wu; Y M Weng; H C Ding; T C Chang
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Direct susceptibility testing with positive BacT/Alert blood cultures by using MicroScan overnight and rapid panels.

Authors:  K B Waites; E S Brookings; S A Moser; B L Zimmer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Gram-negative clinical isolates with the AutoMicrobic system.

Authors:  B A Backes; S J Cavalieri; J T Rudrik; E M Britt
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing of isolates from blood cultures by direct inoculation and early reading of disk diffusion tests.

Authors:  M B Coyle; L A McGonagle; J J Plorde; C R Clausen; F D Schoenknecht
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Rapid flow cytometric bacterial detection and determination of susceptibility to amikacin in body fluids and exudates.

Authors:  C Y Cohen; E Sahar
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Evaluation of a capacitance method for direct antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts in positive blood cultures.

Authors:  H C Chang; J J Chang; A H Huang; T C Chang
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Evaluation of Etest for direct antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts in positive blood cultures.

Authors:  H C Chang; J J Chang; S H Chan; A H Huang; T L Wu; M C Lin; T C Chang
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Clinical laboratory comparison of the 10-ml isolator blood culture system with BACTEC radiometric blood culture media.

Authors:  J A Kellogg; J P Manzella; J H McConville
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  The Performance of Direct Disk Diffusion for Community Acquired Bacteremia due to Gram-Negative Bacilli and Its Impact on Physician Treatment Decisions.

Authors:  Peter Daley; Adam Comerford; Jurgienne Umali; Carla Penney
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 2.471

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.